Yes, even if iphone was a piece of **** brick, the itards would still buy it.
![]()
Yes, even if iphone was a piece of **** brick, the itards would still buy it.
![]()
Yes, even if iphone was a piece of **** brick, the itards would still buy it.
![]()
Well, competition never hurts. I would like to see facial recognition on the iphone as an option to replace the passcode lock, but I feel like having the front camera sensing your eyes like on this phone would use up a lot of battery since it would have to take a picture/video at least every few seconds.
Based on your post history you're an Apple-hater. An Apple-hater posting on an Apple forum. It isn't the "iTards" (seems to be your word of choice here) who are "tards" . . .
Sound like a typical FanDroid.
Maybe you just have a little extra room to spare in that area...
![]()
Explain to me what Apple "innovated" with Siri?and..here we go (again)
Apple calls for an early ban on Samsung Galaxy S III, isn't amused by S Voice
protecting innovation. thank you apple.
Explain to me what Apple "innovated" with Siri?
S-Voice and Siri are both using the same tech designed by Nuance.
Apple doesn't own the tech or have an exclusive license to use it.
Hell, S-Voice is simply Vlingo with a facelift.
Sounds more like their scared and trying to push for a BS customs hold like they did with HTC.
Apple knew HTC's new phones didn't violate their tech. They pushed for the hold just to be *****.
The phones cleared and the only one with egg on their face over the matter is Apple.
just a fan boy that thinks Apple truly made the siri technology lol
Magical and revolutionary my ass.siri is magical and revolutionary. and thanks to siri, i finally have someone to talk to! siri gives me goosebumps every-time i talk to her. dun be an insensitive anonymous coward on the Internet.![]()
and..here we go (again)
Apple calls for an early ban on Samsung Galaxy S III, isn't amused by S Voice
protecting innovation. thank you apple.
Magical and revolutionary my ass.
Seriously, do you isheeps ever pull your head out of your ass for once?
Don't be such a huge rotten apple sheep/drone/if4g on internet.
and..here we go (again)
Apple calls for an early ban on Samsung Galaxy S III, isn't amused by S Voice
protecting innovation. thank you apple.
The Galaxy III seems to be a very appealing offering. Certainly the most capable and powerful smartphone out there, however it is a Samsung phone which means Touchwiz and Samsung «support».
It's something like this: Touchwiz isn't bad as such, nor is it great. Plain vanilla unaltered Android system is fine, also. Perhaps not great in all respects, but point is that Touchwiz neither adds nor subtracts anything substantial to the experience of using the device.
It does make one huge issue though: Samsung support for Android. There is no timely (or sometimes at all) OS upgrade from Samsung available because they aren't really that interested in supporting their own devices.
So when one buys a Samsung phone (and they're very good phones, hardware-wise) one had better not expect *any* support. The device is sold as is, and it will pretty much stay that way.
In that sense, Samsung is selling their phones like they are appliances like a toaster or something, so if there comes an update to the OS, Samsung would simply have you buy a new phone and throw the old one away.
Regardless, the Galaxy III is certainly Samsung's best effort, hardware wise yet and looks and feels very good. The size is not for everyone, but neither is the price.![]()