Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually, the internet is helping to rapidly usher in a "global culture" that transcends national boundaries and shares a common popular culture between peoples of different nationalities, but is a culture that is ultimately complimentary to any "regional/local culture" of the world in which you reside. And since the English language has dominated both business and tech markets for more than a 150 years now (around the same time as rapid globalization has manifested itself) this will probably remain true for the foreseeable future, so it isn't too surprising that English is becoming the de facto "global language" of the planet (either natively spoken or auxiliary) and nor is it surprising that the "quirks" of the English language is rapidly expanding due to it being used as a secondary language in most parts of the world excluding USA/UK/AUS/CAN native speakers.

So, if anything, the internet isn't "destroying English linguistically" it's actually helping it become more robust and relevant for generations to come on a global scale, and the cross-pollination of language loan words goes both ways in general.

Wow, I've finally found someone who's wordier that I am.

At this point, everything you said is a given. It is unsurprising, and no, it's not solely due to the internet. It's due to business. But the internet has accelerated its pace.

Additionally, I wasn't talking about "destroying English linguistically." You shouldn't quote what isn't a quote. I suppose what I said wasn't clear, but it wasn't anything about English being destroyed. What I was talking about was an internet culture being created with English as its core language. Our culture (American culture) is spreading at the cost of other cultures. We ARE becoming more of a global culture. On the one hand it's nice because I speak English, but on another it saddens me because I don't want complete homogenization.

Sure, we all will retain our various cultures, but more and more our language will be global and it will be based mostly on English. I kind of like the idea that there are things I don't know that I have to invest the time to learn, like other languages. But the quicker spread of information will be useful. Of course there are no more hours in my day in which to absorb even more information. So I'll still be missing out anyway. I suppose the more things change the more the stay the same.
 
Wow

Okay, in all honesty, I've never been a huge fan of Apple's ads. Though classy, stylistic, somewhat entertaining and full of catchy music (post 1984) Apple ads always seemed rather exploitive to me.

That's just me. I'm not demeaning the selling power of their commercials in the slightest. In fact, I think Apple commercials are some of the few television commercials that actually work. Either way, they're done well and create an emotional bridge between viewer and products that exploit the audiences need for acceptance, familiarity and comfort. Just because a tool does it job well, doesn't mean one has to like it.

That being said...

This Samsung ad; however, makes me feel ill at ease. Far from the feeling brought on by the effect of the ad, Samsung is giving me a rotten feeling even with the ad itself. I Can't put my finger on it, maybe it's the fact that Euro/American people are hopping about on screen to Korean voiceovers and text, maybe it's the fact that the exclusive connection between daddy and daughter seem to be an electronic device or maybe it's how close this television daddy and daughter seem to be. Either way, this commercial seems, well, just... creepy.

If Samsung was trying to copy Apple's 'style'. It feels like they missed the target. Apple Inc.'s advertising and marketing have always been incredibly good with the insinuation of images. This Samsung ad doesn't insinuate anything. It spells it out in broken English for us: "Daddy and daughter are happy because of of the Galaxy Tab. Now go buy one so you can play with your children too." Am I the only one who gets the 'creepy' vibe here?

You are really supporting stupid racist "all Asians are into pedophily"-stereotypes between the lines? Was that really your intention with using the word "creepy"? (see bolded text)

Sorry - all this flamebait is straining my nerves. And I just have to make sure I really didn't misunderstand you before I delete macrumors from my bookmarks.
 
Why not? They copy everything else.

It amuses me that companies love to show their movie capabilities by featuring a movie you can't yet own. They all seem to do so.
 
Its like they have no shame in copying anymore. I am all for competition, and how many different ways can you make a tablet look. However, come on... Please try to make me think this add is for anything else other than an Apple product.
 
I just got served by Apple...apparently, I'm being sued because I breathe the same air that they do.
 
Slow news day?

All the Galaxy Tab commercials since 2.010 has been about connection with the viewer more than specs.

But yes, Apple has a patent on this type of ads and, even, every type of ads :eek:

My question is; why do people care?!

It's just an advertisement. Samsung's probably poking fun again.

Are you two trolling for attention? Marketing is a big deal. I'd say it's 50% the product.

Copying product and the ad campaign of another company doesn't bother you in the slightest?

----------

Okay, let's not belittle an entire continent because of one advert.

or our cars or our buildings or how about our amusement parks?

http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/05/02/disneyland-in-china/


and a completely unrated amusement park lol
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/12/17/the-ruins-of-wonderland-where-china-hoped-to-rival-disneyland/
 
Are you two trolling for attention? Marketing is a big deal. I'd say it's 50% the product.

Copying product and the ad campaign of another company doesn't bother you in the slightest?

----------



or our cars or our buildings or how about our amusement parks?

http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/05/02/disneyland-in-china/

It's just a commercial....and there is a Disneyland in China. I agree they copy stuff, but China is way ahead of us, so is Japan.
 
Are you two trolling for attention? Marketing is a big deal. I'd say it's 50% the product.

Copying product and the ad campaign of another company doesn't bother you in the slightest?

----------



or our cars or our buildings or how about our amusement parks?

http://www.japanprobe.com/2007/05/02/disneyland-in-china/

I had to chuckle. One-to-one copies.

Trying to be more "progressive" like the west and taking cues from Western popular culture is one thing, but blatant, often one-to-one copies of Western products, ad campaigns and whatever else (that also might be protect by IP law to boot) just smacks of a wholesale lack of imagination and cultural bankruptcy.

Which is a shame, because Eastern cultures are rich in history, ideas, philosophy, etc. But I suppose when it comes to making money, none of that really figures into the transaction. The easy, lazy way out is far more attractive.

----------

It's just a commercial....and there is a Disneyland in China. I agree they copy stuff, but China is way ahead of us, so is Japan.

It isn't "just a commercial." Nor is it "just a product." If you think it is, then there's no point in having discussions about Apple products on an Apple-centric website.

For Apple, Samsung, virtually any player in the industry, they aren't "just commercials" or "just products." There are, quite literally, billions of dollars at stake. A lot of money, strategy, and expectation is riding on these commercials.
 
It isn't "just a commercial." Nor is it "just a product." If you think it is, then there's no point in having discussions about Apple products on an Apple-cnetric website.

For Apple, Samsung, virtually anyone player in the industry, they aren't "just commercials" or "just products." There are, quite literally, billions of dollars at stake. A lot of money, strategy, and expectation is riding on these commercials.

Yes, I agree, but we shouldn't be arguing about a commercial. I doubt Apple was the first to make those types of commercials.
 
For Apple, Samsung, virtually anyone player in the industry, they aren't "just commercials" or "just products." There are, quite literally, billions of dollars at stake. A lot of money, strategy, and expectation is riding on these commercials.

Exactly, this is their livelihood. This is what they invest their money into. Lots of money mind you. And to simply brush it off as "oh it's just a commercial" undermines the intellectual properties of any business. To dumb it down to what people on here can understand: Apple put in the hard work studying for the test and Samsung is peaking over Apple's shoulder for the answers.

----------

Yes, I agree, but we shouldn't be arguing about a commercial. I doubt Apple was the first to make those types of commercials.

If you saw samsung produce an Ad where a woman runs down a corridor throwing a hammer at a screen to 'wake up' the people per-say would you be saying the same thing? or say "wow what a rip off of the apple ad"
 
If you saw samsung produce an Ad where a woman runs down a corridor throwing a hammer at a screen to 'wake up' the people per-say would you be saying the same thing? or say "wow what a rip off of the apple ad"

Yeah, but this Samsung ad isn't exactly like an Apple ad.
 
Yeah, but this Samsung ad isn't exactly like an Apple ad.

If you attempt to dissect it, you'll find whatever is there to support your particular belief. We can cherry-pick anything.

But view the commercial straight up, as is, and it screams "Apple." Add to that everything else Samsung has been doing for months now (http://media.idownloadblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/samsung-copycat-e1317254306784.jpg), put two and two together, and their intentions are immediately clear.

This story has circulated all over the web and everyone's noticed this. It's so obvious.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.