No matter how you describe it, it is still fraud!
Well, okay... I'm really just talking about this, you know? I've never done that.
LOL.
Seriously... Tim, is that you?
p.s. Back when first gen iPhone was still the only iPhone and the 3G was about to come out, I had to exchange several of them because of network issues. I was dropping calls again and was on my 5th phone... it wasn't an AT&T thing, because we'd checked that already.
So, I was at work and already knew I had to go in that week to swap this phone again. I dropped my phone and cracked the very edge of the screen... very tiny crack, but it was there, under the screen protector.
I took the phone in to have it swapped due to the network issue, didn't even mention the crack... Apple Genius gave me another phone. That was that.
I wasn't about to buy a new phone because of a crack when it already had a network issue and was dropping calls anyway.
He didn't care. Case closed. That's the only cracked item I ever returned.
[doublepost=1537905901][/doublepost]
Possibly. And that isn’t really dishonest. But flat out saying it arrived damaged, which was the initial suggestion, is in fact dishonest.
Of course it is, mollyc. I get that. All people have varying levels of comfort with this sort of transaction.
I feel bad when I get handed too much change... I always return it.
If I had a watch and it was scratched, and I thought I may have done it, but I was not sure, I think I could return it and say it was like that when I got it, if it was only a few days old.
Now, if I was SURE that I did it, no... I would feel bad about that, UNLESS... there was something wrong with it more serious than a scratch that had nothing to do with being scratched.
I hope that makes sense.