Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I hope it is true. I was using my nano (2G) in the gym, but prefer my iPhone now as I can watch videos while on the exercise bike. This would allow me to start using my Nike+ again without taking both devices.

BTW, it isn't pressure-activated, it has a little accelerometer inside it to detect each pace.

ah, ok thanks for the clarification. In that case, then yeah, I don't see why there's a real need for actual hardware for an iPhone version... and maybe there won't be and instead you pay a few bucks for the app?

the only other reason I could really see (aside from making money) for having it still in your shoe, is if you attach the phone to your arm, when your foot hits the ground, your body receives a jolt as your body hits the ground. Unless you're really toned (and even then, this may not matter) your skin will, for lack of a better term, jiggle a bit on your arm, and thus shake the iPhone a bit with each impact. Maybe this could be interpreted as multiple steps? Again, just throwing out an idea
 
Agreed. Though I find it difficult to believe that someone at Nike does not approve of every ad representing their products, mistakes happen every day. Me, I'm one of those hyper-sensitive people who calls the cops on folks who park illegally in handicap-designated zones. I have three children with disabilities, one of whom uses a power wheelchair.
Oh, I understand that you've got a child with a disability. I know many parents, including some in your same position. That is why I also recognize your position. But you're doing a disservice to society and to your children by reacting in such a way to something like this. If your kids would benefit from anything it would be strength and the ability to overlook flaws in favor of the whole. A familiarity with disability, though, doesn't make this issue any more relevant to the world. It saddens me that society has lost so much of its ability to make fun of itself, wallowing in fear of self-serving lawsuits.

Disclaimer: I don't even like Nike.

OT
Impossible. No company as big as Nike would run any (National or International) ads without prior approval from some big marketing heads. It's waaaaay to much money to let the kids play with it.
This is an extremely common problem. There are websites devoted to advertising campaign screw-ups like this. Coca-Cola, for example, slips up like this rather frequently, especially in international advertising. Executives do not personally approve every advertising campaign in environments like this (with exceptions such as, I imagine, Apple Inc.) and all it takes is a few people who aren't familiar with an unusual element of society. Apple is, after all, the computer that introduced a certain gal who became a legend among the pot smoking community. It wasn't what they intended.

Being big means less attention to specific advertising methods, not more...

Isn't the iPhone kind of large to be running with?
It is if its weight is enough to pull your pants down. Hehe...

But that problem can be solved by wearing different pants.

I exercise with my iPhone.
 
I've seen a shift in lifestyle priorities, and it helped me in finishing my first ironman last weekend.

That's amazing, congrats!!

I can't believe you don't have better things to do in life than failed attempts to sabotage the corporate image of Nike.

Why are you so concerned with the corporate image of Nike that you feel you need to make a statement like that? Do you work for Nike??

Oh, I understand that you've got a child with a disability... But you're doing a disservice to society and to your children by reacting in such a way to something like this.

Geez, talk about over-reacting. And who are you to lecture the parent of a disabled child about being overly sensitive to an ad that makes fun of disabled people?? Get a grip, man. Go have a run and be glad you can run.
 
They could still offer the shoe chip for treadmill folks, but it would be nice to have the option of going without it, if the GPS was good enough to calculate speed.

The footprint would be a little large, but I'm wondering if anyone will come up with a solution for cyclists? The iphone would make a great display for a cyclist, if someone would come up with the sending unit for detecting what gear you are in, RPMs, etc. Again, only potential issue is size.... have never looked to see what my iPhone would look like mounted to my handlebars.
 
I'm hoping that the new refresh of the iPod Nano will be smaller, full touch screen that will be able to carry this app. Or maybe Apple will come out with an iPod Sport that will be a little larger than the nano, have full touch screen, be water resistant, and either have an accelerometer built in or GPS built in. I really hope that there will be a heart rate monitor someday as well.

I've seen the current armbands for the iPhone and iPod touch, and it looks like they would be cumbersome to run with. I can't imagine running around with an iPhone strapped to my arm screaming out, "Someone please mug this person, they have an iPhone"
 
I like the Nike+ system, I use the Nike+ Sportband as I like to run light and don't like running with headphones. I use the sensor on my Asics with the Marware Sportsuit pouch as I prefer Asics to Nike shoes.

I can't see myself wanting to run with a bulky iphone.

I just want them to update the Nike+ Sportband utility to a universal binary!
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_0_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5C1 Safari/525.20)

scottybe said:
Why should the iPhone application require the Nike+ hardware?

From Apple's site: "The Sport Kit allows your Nike+ shoe to talk to your iPod nano. The sensor uses a sensitive accelerometer to measure your activity, then wirelessly transfers this data to the receiver on your iPod nano."

It seems to me that since the iPhone already has anaccelerometer, this app should work with any shoes without special hardware. In fact, apps like RunKeeper are already available on the App Store. What value will Nike provide?

As for running with one, I'm currently running with a 3rd Generation iPod, complete with mini hard drive. It does look a little conspicuous, but it has never skipped on me.

What I'd wish for is a sensor that uses Bluetooth to talk to the Nike software installs on my iPhone. That way, no receiver attached to the phone, but you still get the accuracy of the shoe-based sensor
 
Why should the iPhone application require the Nike+ hardware?

...

It seems to me that since the iPhone already has anaccelerometer, this app should work with any shoes without special hardware. In fact, apps like RunKeeper are already available on the App Store. What value will Nike provide?

Unless you plan on wearing your iPhone under your shoe, it's not going to be accurate. The accelerometer in nike+ works by calculating how much time your foot spends going up, on the ground, and pushing away. An accelerometer is not like a speedometer in a car, wearing the sensor anywhere on your body but on the bottom of the shoes would not work.

RunKeeper looks alright, but Nike+ provides the value of a huge userbase with a lot of miles already on their system. I currently run with Nike+ and an iPod nano, and I know a lot of people who would be overjoyed to have Nike+ integration on their iPhones.
 
Unless you plan on wearing your iPhone under your shoe, it's not going to be accurate. The accelerometer in nike+ works by calculating how much time your foot spends going up, on the ground, and pushing away. An accelerometer is not like a speedometer in a car, wearing the sensor anywhere on your body but on the bottom of the shoes would not work.

RunKeeper looks alright, but Nike+ provides the value of a huge userbase with a lot of miles already on their system. I currently run with Nike+ and an iPod nano, and I know a lot of people who would be overjoyed to have Nike+ integration on their iPhones.

I love my Nike+, but I don't think I would use it with an iPhone or a touch. The nano is perfect for running -- small, lightweight, and a display just big enough for what you need. Nobody wants a sweaty iPhone.
 
in my experience, i'm not sure the gps is accurate enough for this.

Thus far, if I've ever been lucky enough to have GPS trigger in the Maps app, it has always consistently trailed my actual location. This is going to be a major, major problem for gps driving instructions, but maybe not so major for running. At least with running I'm only doing like 6-7 mph.

The GPS unit in my car is accurate to within a few feet, by "few" I mean probably off by 50 or so feet max. That's not bad for a car, especially when the dot can stay on the road in pre-loaded maps through a little software. But this is pathetic for tracking running. It also doesn't help out the 6 million original iPhone owners (hi!), so I hope they will still use some sort of sensor. I bought these darn shoes hoping that would be the case.
 
That's what I'm thinking. It's too big to run with, but I've seen people at the gym/running with a full size iPod.

Nike will need to release an armband ASAP when they finally release this app. I've read the reviews for the Belkin iPhone armband (both new and old)...and the quality seems like crap. The glue attaching the front always comes undone.

During my marathon training, I tried Nike+ and compared it to a run specific Garmin Forerunner. No match. The Garmin is way better (and fits on your wrist) in terms of accuracy and features. Cost is equal to a Nike+ and a Nano.

I also run with a Nano on shorter runs. No way I would run with my 3G iPhone. It's too big, heavy and would be vulnerable to sweat and sun damage (even in an arm band). I even tried a running belt that holds phones/mp3 players...too bulky even on a short 10k run. For the gym, yes, Nike+ would be fine.

Not only that, if you run for 2+ hours, it would kill your iPhone battery as it would have to be on + GPS for that whole time. I also just don't want to subject such an expensive phone to the rigors of running outdoors.
 
Geez, talk about over-reacting. And who are you to lecture the parent of a disabled child about being overly sensitive to an ad that makes fun of disabled people?? Get a grip, man. Go have a run and be glad you can run.
Point is the ad doesn't make fun of disabled people. ;)

I respect his view and understand why he has it. But when a person posts a statement like that in a public discussion forum, they are opening it up to discussion. That's how forums work. My issue is with the problems brought about by views like this -- not disability specifically, but rather a fear of offending people -- and what it has done to our society.

But this isn't an important matter, though.
I won't detract further from this rather excellent topic.
 
These are definitely fake. 100% guaranteed.

Trust me, when I say these are fake. If there is anyone who knows that these are fake, it is me :) The real Nike+ app for iPhone / iPod touch looks way better then this does. These are garbage compared to the real deal.
 
Couple quick thoughts --

1. I hope they ditch the required dock connector and use bluetooth to talk with the shoe-accel. chip.

2. I know there have long been rumors of integration with gym cardio equipment, and I also hope that said integration uses bluetooth.

3. I hope they support HRM integration via bluetooth into the software as well (ideally including Polar and some of the other brands).

4. How about a cyclometer that ties in as well?

5. I'd love to be able to track my lifting the same way (especially to be able to see the data and graphs online at the same website).

5. Since this has turned into a wishlist for Santa, being able to track food consumption via the software would be a nice touch.

P.S. I used to track diet and exercise on a PocketPC several years ago and it was a fantastic system that kept me tied to the stack for a long time. I remember there were two products called PocketDietTracker and MySportTraining that were integrated fairly well. I'd love to replicate that on my iPhone with Nike+ but updated with HRM and GPS support without having to buy some of the dreadful devices out there now.
 
I just started running three weeks ago and I've been 'borrowing' my wife's iPod Nano to use Nike+ so I'd be really pleased if they make it compatible with the iPhone :)

Now I just need to find some headphones that don't pop out of my ears after every dozen paces!
 
Tracks Wiki?

What I would like to see is popular or recommended hiking/running tracks in various cities that you can bring up in the software and then follow. Say you go somewhere for a weekend, you can see recommended tracks on the map and goal times to challenge. Even a 'high score' system would be cool, to see what times elite athletes have done.
 
i can honestly say that the nike+ program completely turned running on for me. before it, there was little motivation to challenge myself as i never saw results, but after having used it since January of 07, I've seen a shift in lifestyle priorities, and it helped me in finishing my first ironman last weekend. i recommend it to anyone, and the iphone app will further my interest in the program.


Congrats. That is pretty awesome. I never really thought of how much of a motivation tool this could be.
 
i'm iffy about this....when it's your phone and your ipod and many other things all in one......you don't feel like running with it...at least i don't
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.