“The best products” is completely subjective. But, Apple isn’t putting a gun to anyone’s head forcing them to buy Apple products. The idea that sales, revenue and stock price don’t matter is ridiculous.
Legend says Tim Cook has never smiled.
From a business and a shareholder perspective, Jobs' recommendation was spot on, Cook has done amazing things, and made Apple into the cell phone giant that it is today.
From my perspective as a long time Apple fan, he is no Jobs, and my love for Apple has diminished to the point that for the first time since the mid-90's, I am strongly looking elsewhere for my electronic needs.
Steve would have never approved of the notch.
I did not realize that the Airpods, Apple Watch and HomePod were out 7 years ago. I must have missed the announcement while Steve was alive.The sad thing is, seven years later, Apple is selling almost the exact same line up of products as when Steve Jobs was CEO. The only difference is bigger or smaller screens. There has been ZERO innovation at Apple since Steve Jobs left.
Not sure if serious...And I bet Mr. Cook accomplished all of the above milestones while not once feeling so privileged and entitled with his position, to park his car in the handicapped parking spaces near the front door.
Evidence Apple's products aren't pleasing their customers? Don't start talking about software bugs (they get fixed) and things like no updated Mac Mini or a failed TouchBar.Silly statement. Maybe I am misunderstanding you.
If you mean from just a fiscal perspective, I would agree, but from an innovation and quality of product perspective, there has been many examples of companies having financial success from selling a turd of a product.
When MS launched Windows 95, it did so with one of the most successful advertising campaigns in history. The product that MS was selling was crap, and didn't work without updates, but it didn't stop people from buying it. There were reports of people that didn't even own a computer buying Windows 95. Also, all the major features that Windows 95 were advertising was already available on the Mac OS, a much more stable OS too.
I could probably list hundreds more example of similar situations. History is filled with situations that a company was financially successful, but had an inferior product.
If you are talking from an Apple shareholder perspective, then Apple if doing great, and should keep it up. From a consumer perspective, I would rather have great product from a company with good financials, than a inferior product from a company with the best financials.
From a business and a shareholder perspective, Jobs' recommendation was spot on, Cook has done amazing things, and made Apple into the cell phone giant that it is today.
From my perspective as a long time Apple fan, he is no Jobs, and my love for Apple has diminished to the point that for the first time since the mid-90's, I am strongly looking elsewhere for my electronic needs.
I did not realize that the Airpods, Apple Watch and HomePod were out 7 years ago. I must have missed the announcement while Steve was alive.
Apple Watch, Face ID, AirPodsName three things that have improved at Apple since SJ's death that weren't natural technological evolutions, without talking about the stock or revenue.
Fair to say a worse CEO could've quite easily driven the company into the ground by squeezing more profit out of cheaper and worse products, with more gimmicks and less substance - but it is starting to get to death by a thousand cuts with lingering old hardware, the 16GB iPhones having reiterated themselves as 128 and 256GB Macs at various price points that amount of storage is unsuitable for, nickel and diming on things like dongles and mac power cords. Unfortunately I don't see anyone who can rescue Apple from the Wall Street demands for more and more profits, and with pretty much stalled volumes the only thing they can do is try to eke more money out of each sale and attract people to Apple services. Hopefully the services prevail to keep products from ballooning further in price...Well, not sure many agree from a business perspective. From the basic and most unsophisticated view that is role is to maximize share holders wealth, he has done well, but did he maximize? I believe others would have made Apple siginifantly more money, and from a business perspective not let andriod dominate the world market.
Imagine Apple sales if they moved to bigger screens earlier, if they didn’t wait so long to adopt Qi, or didn’t let Google blow them away with google now.
What if they actually focused on their computer line and increased sales from MacBooks, Mac mini and Mac Pro sales. Can they only focus on one thing at a time? Yes there cash cow is iPhone, but so many people have switched on that product line?
And from a business perspective, I have perchased other products not in the Apple ecosystem because Apple products are lacking. Let’s not even get started on home pod, Apple TV, and others. All I know is I have spoken with my wallet, and huge sector of the tech community has moved to andriod, those are lost sales.
Apple Watch, Face ID, AirPods
Hopefully the services prevail to keep products from ballooning further in price...
Not sure if serious...
Tim makes money for apple because he gives customers what they want? As a general statement, it seems some of the customers that say they have been with apple since the beginning don't really like Tim's management of the company. However, the universe seems to disagree with much of this sentiment.A sad day! Tim is only better at making money. Every thing else, meh. Jobs knew this though, he loved his way of controlling the supple chain and I think had a lot to do with letting him run things. We can criticize Tim for a lot, but he has done a good job keeping Apple making tons of money.