Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple is a nickel and dime you company. That’s why I’m slowly moving to other products that offer the same exact thing at a lesser price like the Firestick 4K.
 
Yeah I keep seeing youtubers say we are getting prores which is like what apple done for photos apple raw and they are wrong prores has that and raw we are not getting the raw one so you can’t edit the colour etc it’s just a better codec
?
The different flavors of ProRes are just different codec compression rates, not to be really seen as a better or worse, but different levels to allow for different workflows and different final distribution. Even the variation of lowest ProRes, being proxy, is still a fairly high bitrate 174 GB/hr for 60p 4096x2160
 
There should be an option to force it to store videos outside of your photo library so it doesn't fill it up.
I really hope there is, for the sake of people's sanity.

Imagine having a typical average cable Internet connection, with 15 or 20 megabits upload speed, and having to wait on a ProRes video to upload to iCloud. It's absolutely not a sane situation. It already gets annoying when I take regular 4K videos on my 11 Pro Max and it feels like it takes forever for them to go to iCloud and then back to my Mac. More than once I've paused the iCloud upload and plugged the phone in with USB to transfer a longer video faster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subi257
There's really no excuse for this, other than pushing higher storage options.

iPhone 12 128GB can write at least 400MB/sec. So it's obviously not speed related.
I suspect A) yes, Apple obviously wants everyone to buy a 1TB iPhone 13 Pro Max and B) ProRes files will be pretty massive, at least compared to previous hi-res. You'll crush 256GB in no time. So the limitation is likely C) two-fold, me thinks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subi257
ProRes is not a raw video format, its an uncompressed format that gives you more options in post production. As I said, I'm a film producer, and we've used past generation iPhones in a pinch. Prores on a phone is actually a big deal.

I'm not sure how unspecified ProRes compares to third app video apps that allow you to record extremely high bitrates. I see people going so far to suggest it's 444 which only few cameras can pull it off to begin with. After all iPhone doesn't need 444 at all. My guess its 422 LT or some new iPhone ProRes specification.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ender21
I suspect A) yes, Apple obviously wants everyone to buy a 1TB iPhone 13 Pro Max and B) ProRes files will be pretty massive, at least compared to previous hi-res. You'll crush 256GB in no time. So the limitation is likely C) two-fold, me thinks.
Yes, ProRes files....even in proxy can be pretty massive. At work we are switching over to ProRes recorded on AJA Video Systems 2TB SSD's from Sony XDCAM HD. The ProRes files will be bigger, buy they are more cross platform friendly.
 
Apple leaving Pro users hanging with no USB-C transfer rates and no 256 GB base storage for the Pro model to use the Prores fully. No improved Airdrop to compensate. Very disappointing. But they wanted to claim no price increase. Hopefully this gets cleaned up for iPhone 14.

Really, this impacts like less than 1% of the users, so it's not really "hanging." You can't do it today anyway on any device, so you're making this a lot bigger deal than it is.

In any case anyone who shoots ProRes is going to figure out what they need before they buy an iPhone 13pmx.
 
Yes, ProRes files....even in proxy can be pretty massive. At work we are switching over to ProRes recorded on AJA Video Systems 2TB SSD's from Sony XDCAM HD. The ProRes files will be bigger, buy they are more cross platform friendly.
Oh that sounds fun.
I think it a pretty dope move by Apple to offer native ProRes caliber captures. It's kind of staggering, really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subi257
Knowing Apple, it will be standard within the next 5 years, for the high end phones at least. Sadly

Base on this wiki it appears that Apple sticks to a base storage & other sizes for at around 4-5 years.

4GB
  • 2007 - 1st
8GB
  • 2008 - 3G
  • 2009 - 3Gs
  • 2010- 4
  • 2011- 4s
  • 2013- 5c
16GB
  • 2012 - 5
  • 2013 - 5s
  • 2014 - 6 & 6 Plus
  • 2015 - 6s & 6s Plus
  • 2016 - SE
32GB
  • 2016 - 7 & 7 Plus
64GB
  • 2017 - 8, 8 Plus & X
  • 2018 - Xr, Xs & Xs Max
  • 2019 - 11, 11 Pro, 11 Pro Max
  • 2020 - SE, 12 & 12 Mini
128GB
  • 2020 - 12 Pro & 12 Pro Max
  • 2021 - 13, 13 mini, 13 Pro & 13 Pro Max
Base on this pattern 256GB base model may show up by year 2024 or 2025 iPhone. I hope this will mean that Macs will have a higher base storage from today & onward like 512GB or 1TB.

For those reading I made an error. Android flagships from companies like Samsung started offering 128GB base models in 2019 when the iPhone 11 Pro Max only had 64GB. I remember this as I am using a 11 Pro Max weeks after it first shipped.
 
They are big.....especially depending on the bit rate it's recording at. We have been switching over to ProRes at work from Avid DnxHD
Yeah, I’m assuming it’s gonna be a modified pipeline that’s a bit more compressed than regular ProRes but I’m definitely going to be shooting a lot of content with it regardless because of the better color fidelity and compression. If they’re too big though I may have to use it sparingly.
 
It’s just such a weird caveat to have. “These are our most pro iPhones ever. Except the 128gb. That one is semi-pro.”
Exactly. It's called "choice" and pricepoint for those who don't NEED or WANT to shoot pro res.
 
Apple is a nickel and dime you company. That’s why I’m slowly moving to other products that offer the same exact thing at a lesser price like the Firestick 4K.
I'm slowly doing the same.
Ditching my apple watch except when doing workouts.
Got the bose 700 instead of the double the price airpods max
getting rid of my ipad and just using a kindle for reading.

My ideal would be just mac + iphone + airpod pros
 
  • Like
Reactions: SR 7
I'm considering going from my 11 to a 13 Pro for the ProMotion. I would go with 128gb because I don't do any video editing, but it's disappointing not to have all pro features on ALL pro phones. Not a deal breaker for me however.
 
That is completely wrong. There are so many variations of 4K ranging from toy 4K to crazy 4K at TB's per minute based on the bitrate recorded at. Even staying in ProRes there is everything from ProRes Proxy at 35 Mbits/s to ProRes 4444XQ at 3318 Mbits/s all based on 3840x2160 (UHD) and 3539 Mbits/s 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
Preach! Bit rate, codec, color space, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subi257
For all those posting that "there is no reason why" I would be curious what they are basing that assessment on? I do not yet know what flavour of ProRes is being used on the iPhone nor do I have any details on the internal storage or other technical factors that might influence this decision so I am quite surprised there are so many who apparently do have the information. Please share.

It is worth clarifying that ProRes will only be available on the Pro models, and as the article stated in order to record 4K ProRes you will need a 256GB or larger iPhone; you can still shoot 1080p ProRes on the 128GB. Where some see this as an evil conspiracy I am more inclined to think that anyone buying the 128GB version is likely not thinking about shooting 4K video in the ProRes format so probably will not care. You definitely should not shoot ProRes if you are shooting video of the dog doing silly things and posting it directly to the web which is what I suspect the vast majority of iPhone users are doing. I also suspect there really is a technical reason this is not available at 128GB. And for those who state that 256GB should be the new minimum, well, maybe so but at this point that is irrelevant. The base storage went up and the price did not, at least that is something.

As to the Cinematic Mode I am very curious about that. I have been looking at a number of cinematography websites and it is creating a buzz for sure. What I initially missed, but some others have noted, this is not depth-of-field as created by a lens but rather a computational depth-of-field. When the camera shoots everything is in focus but the processor will try to differentiate between foreground and background through some fabulously complex and truly cool processes but, as we have seen with Portrait Mode, with varying degrees of success. A $2000 iPhone will not be replacing a $50000 dollar camera with a $25000 piece of glass on the front BUT it might well replace some consumer and prosumer video cameras IF (and that is a big IF right now) the Cinematic Mode can be made to work effectively beyond 1080p30 at some point. For instance, how will it handle a CU over-the-shoulder like the example below where the foreground clearly intersects the background? I have watched the sample video a few times but did not see anything close enough to this common set-up to inform.

CU_OTS.png

(shot courtesy of Mobile Motion Film Festival Free Film School)

We do not know yet but I suspect the above example might cause some issues (what about a foreground cross, then what?). Again, it is also very important to repeat that, at this time, Cinematic mode only works for 1080p30 and it is unclear whether you can record Cinematic Mode in ProRes. I also wonder if any of this technology will be available to third party video applications? Will Filmic's DoubleTake allow ProRes recording? At 24fps? In Cinematic Mode? Across multiple lenses simultaneously? There is so much we do not know yet. This is just the first pass at this technology by Apple and I look forward to seeing where it goes but I am not expecting it to change my world anytime soon.

I do expect to see some students making films with iPhones plus Cinematic Mode and look forward to seeing the results. I will also be incredibly jealous. I want to wait just one more year before replacing my current iPhone but Cinematic mode and ProRes has peaked my interest.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rimbs
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.