The nuances that earn the "top spot" are irrelevant to 99.9999% of people.
You can dismiss it all you like, but the machine learning and processing that the Pixel does is absolutely innovative. Nobody uses actual cameras now, save for some "DSLR WARRIORS." People use their phone camera to document their entire life, children, vacations, all of it. In 40 years, you'll appreciate the nuances that earn the "top spot" since the images/video from your phone are all you have to remember life. Oh, and full-size images/videos are stored via the Pixel in Google Photos for free. You
are using Google Photos, aren't you? If not, you need to start right now. Amazeballs (I know, NSA spying!!!11 etc).
The portrait mode, for example, is basically perfect. There are no artifacts/blurring around the hair/head since the algorithm is based on millions of portrait photos.
I understand people hate Google and drink the Tim Kool-Aid around here, but it's pretty easy to recognize the superiority of Google's Pixel photo/OIS/EIS. Had Apple done this, it would be smugly considered revolutionary and aggressively defended by everyone that is partial to Apple.
Let me remind ya'll that competition is good. Keeps pushing all manufacturers to do their best and consumers always win.
There is no need to have one telephone be the "winner."
And it has to be said...I know dxo is "lol fake" but there isn't currently any other widely used testing protocol. Until then, just know the Pixel 2 camera is really freaking good. Saying otherwise or dismissing it is a bit silly IMO. Yes Virginia, it's possible that there is another device out there that produces better results than what Apple makes. This is it.