Should be 16x9 not 4x3, otherwise, why not?
It amazes me how the world of gizmo speculation works. First, there will never be a tablet (iPad) because Microsoft already failed with that ... and if there is one, the volume will be low. Then the iPad rocks the gizmo world.
Then, there won't be an iPad mini because Apple is plenty successful with the iPad, and the (then crappy) 7" Android tablets don't sell well ....
Finally, the idea of anything over the ideal, optimized 9.7" iPad is goofy because, why the larger Microsoft tablets are tanking and Apple doesn't make anything that doesn't sell a gazillion units each ....
Well let's just look at computer monitors and laptop sizes.
There's room enough for a whole variety of sizes. 10.1" exists but is generally regarded as too small. 17.3" is generally too big. There's not a lot of consensus about what's right though. 15.6" Windows laptops flood the sale ads over here. 14" in Asia. 13.3" in the Apple world, but 11.6" sells remarkably well in a supposedly netbook-free world.
So even Apple has several sizes of laptops, which are lower volume than iPads. The iPad mini sells plenty. Why shouldn't the iPad line expand to include a 12.9" version?
Choice is good. Not all Apple products have to blow away sales volume records.
Heck, if this is what it takes to get a gorgeous (iPad4 level of quality) screen in a better size for "personal home theater" viewing (an oxymoron, that) I'll take one. I can endure video on a Touch, an iPad Retina adds sufficient visual detail to be a quality experience, I'm sure 12.9" will be even more immersive.
But if you go that size, time to switch to wide-screen format. In that size, the "reading a newspaper" argument recedes. With a screen that size, jus read the NY Times in portrait mode....
It amazes me how the world of gizmo speculation works. First, there will never be a tablet (iPad) because Microsoft already failed with that ... and if there is one, the volume will be low. Then the iPad rocks the gizmo world.
Then, there won't be an iPad mini because Apple is plenty successful with the iPad, and the (then crappy) 7" Android tablets don't sell well ....
Finally, the idea of anything over the ideal, optimized 9.7" iPad is goofy because, why the larger Microsoft tablets are tanking and Apple doesn't make anything that doesn't sell a gazillion units each ....
Well let's just look at computer monitors and laptop sizes.
There's room enough for a whole variety of sizes. 10.1" exists but is generally regarded as too small. 17.3" is generally too big. There's not a lot of consensus about what's right though. 15.6" Windows laptops flood the sale ads over here. 14" in Asia. 13.3" in the Apple world, but 11.6" sells remarkably well in a supposedly netbook-free world.
So even Apple has several sizes of laptops, which are lower volume than iPads. The iPad mini sells plenty. Why shouldn't the iPad line expand to include a 12.9" version?
Choice is good. Not all Apple products have to blow away sales volume records.
Heck, if this is what it takes to get a gorgeous (iPad4 level of quality) screen in a better size for "personal home theater" viewing (an oxymoron, that) I'll take one. I can endure video on a Touch, an iPad Retina adds sufficient visual detail to be a quality experience, I'm sure 12.9" will be even more immersive.
But if you go that size, time to switch to wide-screen format. In that size, the "reading a newspaper" argument recedes. With a screen that size, jus read the NY Times in portrait mode....