Definitely! I'm excited to see this sweet screen in person!In fairness it’s not just the physical dimensions that are important to consider but also the resolution differences.
Definitely! I'm excited to see this sweet screen in person!In fairness it’s not just the physical dimensions that are important to consider but also the resolution differences.
That's awesome! I'm sure you'll enjoy it!Coming from a 13" Mac air m1 I ordered the MacBook pro 16. I'm excited for the larger size and will be of great use to me.
How did you get it so early?! Thank you for sharingLooks great
I think this is true for myself certainly. When I am in hardcore work mode I have a dual monitor setup, external keyboard and mouse and the laptop is in clamshell mode.When on the couch and simple single tasks are done, even 13" is just fine / perfect size wise.
IMO: 14" will be great for travel and great at home with external display. There is no compromise in such setup.
When the 17" MacBook Pro was a thing, I brought mine everywhere for years & it didn't seem like a problem then so... what's my problem now? ?
How did you get it so early?! Thank you for sharingLooks great
4k Is where it's at for a lean and affordable setup. The pixel density holds up, colorists beware ; to my understanding 4k is the wild west of pannels.Just get yourself a monitor at home. Working on two screens is a pleasure. Every person who I suggested to use notebook + external display + docking station ended up loving such setup. I work on both laptop and external display (as a main one), some just use external display and notebook lid is closed.
If budget allows - go for LG 5K (new or on sale / second hand), but overall a nice WQHD (2560x1440) 27" display with thin bezels will work out great too (of course it will not be as sharp, but scaling will be perfect). *I have not played around with 4K screens in 24-27" sizes, so not sure how scaling is there. If you have a chance - try how that works out for you (quite a lot of 4K screens out there today).
Using only laptop screen at work or home office is just way inferior solution compared to a proper big external display. Does not matter if it is 14" screen or 16" screen.
This all applies when multiple apps, tables, notebooks, chat programs etc. are used and info is getting from one app to another.
When on the couch and simple single tasks are done, even 13" is just fine / perfect size wise.
IMO: 14" will be great for travel and great at home with external display. There is no compromise in such setup.
Yes, these 24" LG 4K displays are a great option too. Nowhere to be found at where I live at the moment though. Have found one second hand recently but close to the price of 27" 5K one...4k Is where it's at for a lean and affordable setup. The pixel density holds up, colorists beware ; to my understanding 4k is the wild west of pannels.
Mine are 27'' though, gave up on trying to get the 24'' and treated myself to a few nights out with the differenceYes, these 24" LG 4K displays are a great option too. Nowhere to be found at where I live at the moment though. Have found one second hand recently but close to the price of 27" 5K one...
Thank you for the photos!
I see. So from these pics of yours 4k on 27" screen clearly works out just fine on MacOS scaling wise. This is definitely good to know since so far I came across very mixed info about that.?Mine are 27'' though, gave up on trying to get the 24'' and treated myself to a few nights out with the difference.
The pixel density is allright still (I sit at around 67cm of them) with the extra size helping for legibility.
My only gripe is color accuracy, but it is a non-factor in my use-case.I see. So from these pics of yours 4k on 27" screen clearly works out just fine on MacOS scaling wise. This is definitely good to know since so far I came across very mixed info about that.?
And pixel density for sure is good enough on this size still.
Well we’re all quite a few years older now and the muscles are no longer bulging as much.
My mate had me totally convinced that he'd got his hands on a PS5 a few days before release with a screen grab of the box on his table. Turned out it was AR ?♂️ He was chuckling about that for ages the bastard lolThat looks like his old gen 16" compared to the AR 14" version from Apple lol
in my case when I'm at home or the office, I plug into displays. I'm so excited the smaller MBP finnally has some horsepowerWhile I obviously see the benefits of the 14", I can't see myself downsizing from a 16" to a 14". Since the 16" has slim bezels and moderate volume (vs a gaming laptop for instance) I found it not so heavy to carry.
I would pick 14" only if I use if i worked extensively on the go/outside which is not my case.
Anyway thanks for sharing !![]()
Just get yourself a monitor at home. Working on two screens is a pleasure. Every person who I suggested to use notebook + external display + docking station ended up loving such setup. I work on both laptop and external display (as a main one), some just use external display and notebook lid is closed.
"Anything expensive in life is worth paying for. Something.. something, spend more money."Oh great, so now I need to buy an expensive external display to add to my $3,500 laptop order.
Actually that's a good idea, although if I want to use TouchID I won't be able to without spending even more money on a new TouchID external keyboard to replace my current bluetooth keyboard. ?. And since I use a long password, I'll definitely need that since I don't always wear my Apple Watch at home.
This is going to be one pricey upgrade.
I traveled with a 17" Powerbook/MacBook Pro + a 15" IBM/Lenovo/HP at the same time for well over a decade. Traveling with one 16" will be a cake walk.if you guys are thinking of traveling wiht these, you are kidding yourselves. I traveled with the 12 inch 2lb MacBook for 3 years and it fit perfectly on the airplane tray table. the other sizes wouldnt fit with eh screen tilted properly. Also I enjoyed putting int into a small thin backpack or man purse. It was a 1 hand grab and carry when I was typing reports at convention events. That is a travel Mac.
If the ppi is higher than 14 is probably just as good as 16 for around the house. I put the 16" on an adjustable stand to eye level and use a full size keyboard. my view area is just right and I dont have to move my head around to look at side by side documents, which causes fatigue. Yea I have a 32" and 27" 4k monitors but find that I dont use them much because of lower ppi and the need to move my head around to read docs. Big monitors are great for creative work like video, photos, where you need all the tools spread out and comparison images. I dont know how you guys use multiple monitors without fatigue.
I wish these MacBooks can angle the screen further back so that I can sit it almost vertical on a stand and move it closer to my face to get a bugger screen effect. the higher ppi is better than a big screen in my opinion.
BTW im not the fat guy in the pic. Im 175 lb and I work out. just for your reference and my flight description use. 3.5lb or 4.5 lb doesnt really matter for home use I guess. it will both get uncomfortable in bed or on lap. only 2 lb will do for travel. Personally im trying to learn how to use the iPad mini for travel. for those of you with the romantic fantasy of occasionally working out of a coffee shop, I find it distracting and uncomfortable. if you indeed travel often and need a laptop, ideally you want the upcoming MacBook (hopefully 12.9" 2 LB) or you are kidding yourself. im torn between upcoming MacBook and bigger nicer screen in my face at home.
I wouldn't recommend QHD displays. You can't get proper scaling other than native, but in this case, everything is super small and hard to see. High-res scaling doesn't work in the current Mac OS for QHD screens. I tried to find the solution for my MBA M1, found a lot of discussions on the Apple forum itself, no resolution. I then checked it on my wife's MBA Intel and the same thing, while I know for sure that in the past it wasn't a problem. It looks like Apple doesn't consider low-res displays as a priority. All their built-in displays are retina/4K, or 5k+, so they don't care about QHD that is not as popular as 1080p or 4kJust get yourself a monitor at home. Working on two screens is a pleasure. Every person who I suggested to use notebook + external display + docking station ended up loving such setup. I work on both laptop and external display (as a main one), some just use external display and notebook lid is closed.
If budget allows - go for LG 5K (new or on sale / second hand), but overall a nice WQHD (2560x1440) 27" display with thin bezels will work out great too (of course it will not be as sharp, but scaling will be perfect). *I have not played around with 4K screens in 24-27" sizes, so not sure how scaling is there. If you have a chance - try how that works out for you (quite a lot of 4K screens out there today).
Using only laptop screen at work or home office is just way inferior solution compared to a proper big external display. Does not matter if it is 14" screen or 16" screen.
This all applies when multiple apps, tables, notebooks, chat programs etc. are used and info is getting from one app to another.
When on the couch and simple single tasks are done, even 13" is just fine / perfect size wise.
IMO: 14" will be great for travel and great at home with external display. There is no compromise in such setup.
Oh great, so now I need to buy an expensive external display to add to my $3,500 laptop order.
Actually that's a good idea, although if I want to use TouchID I won't be able to without spending even more money on a new TouchID external keyboard to replace my current bluetooth keyboard. ?. And since I use a long password, I'll definitely need that since I don't always wear my Apple Watch at home.
This is going to be one pricey upgrade.
Interesting. Native scaling on 27” WQHD works fine for me, but I see your point for sure. Quite a few of my relatives / friends / colleagues 55+ years old simply prefer bigger displays text / scaling since it is more comfortable. Bigger resolution helps with sharpness big time for sure.I wouldn't recommend QHD displays. You can't get proper scaling other than native, but in this case, everything is super small and hard to see. High-res scaling doesn't work in the current Mac OS for QHD screens. I tried to find the solution for my MBA M1, found a lot of discussions on the Apple forum itself, no resolution. I then checked it on my wife's MBA Intel and the same thing, while I know for sure that in the past it wasn't a problem. It looks like Apple doesn't consider low-res displays as a priority. All their built-in displays are retina/4K, or 5k+, so they don't care about QHD that is not as popular as 1080p or 4k