You must remember that you are no more important that anyone else.
But people that want to experience the whole internet without having to rely on the Flash plugin are less important than the people who do?
You're needs and your preferences are no more important than mine, or mine yours. Everyone who uses the internet has their own interests and things that they enjoy. Be it reference works on nuclear physics or seeing how many balls they can throw in a hoop. It is for everyone.
As long as Adobe chooses to support my platform of choice.
What people who are trying to argue in favour of Flash are attempting to explain is that they feel, the best way is for any device to be able to offer people as wide a range of "what's out there" as possible.
And they ignore any possible tradeoffs of supporting as wide a range of "what's out there" as possible.
So that you and a 5 year old child you loves funny animations can both equally enjoy the richness of the internet.
But wouldn't it be better is those funny animations were in an open standard that anyone could access?
You perhaps (I have not followed your text) and/or others are arguing that devices should be made that restrict what can be seen by everyone as you don't like it or want it.
Every device restricts what can be seen by everyone. Especially mobile devices.
As a consumer, you should never argue for less, or for options to be taken away from you. That is a silly way, unless it hurts people like drugs, or guns.
When you use the word "never" in your argument, chances are you are not thinking things through. Especially when you disprove the argument with your next sentence.
What makes this argument even more stupid is that it's not a true belief, it's a constructed belief based upon some argument between two companies and the views of one person at the head of Apple.
For some people. But I suppose the fanboy argument has to come up every 6.7 posts or so. Considering I've been blocking Flash for 5 years because of reasons that Jobs never even mentioned, I'm going to argue that my true belief was not influenced by Jobs. I do appreciate him supporting my decision though.
If Apple had (or did) work with Adobe, Flash could now be running on Mac's and iPads as smooth as silk and PC owners would be complaining that it runs on Mac's better, and then Apple fans would be saying how great Flash is as the company they like fully supports is.
Because you can see all alternative futures.
It's a totally made up argument in the 1st place.
Because standing on principle is only for imaginary people.
But as I said, you should never argue and champion for things to be taken away and choice to be removed.
Except for the things that you agree should be taken away and removed such as drugs and guns.
And you are the one arguing for choice to be removed. People that support Flash have many, many choices. You are arguing to remove the choice of a device that doesn't support Flash. What choice am I arguing to remove? Can't remove a choice that doesn't exist.
There are many things I don't like or don't want, but I don't go telling others that my needs are more important than their needs as that would make me look an ass.
And yet here you are telling people that don't want Flash that their needs are less important than your needs. The lack of Flash on iOS devices is increasing the amount of content available to us.
But then again, I know I'm wasting my breath with all this![]()
Depends on what you are trying to do. If you are trying to have a discussion, than probably not. But if you are trying to convert everyone to your way of thinking, than you probably are.