Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Some Apple Apps Will No Longer Receive Every New Feature Without a Subscription

Not a fan of subscription-based app access, or bundles. It's like subscribing to a Cable TV "package" for one channel and not watching the other 20 channels that come with it. General waste of money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaladinGuy and RevTEG
I just to say that I really don't like paying for software as a subscription. I think Microsoft first called it software as a service many years ago. I still prefer the buy once model. I also thought Pages, Numbers, and Keynote were free.
 
JoeSilver said:
Outside the Apple world their office apps are virtually useless because too limited (in both their features and their compatibility with the only standard that matters, unfortunately: Microsoft).
Nonetheless, since my personal spreadsheets and documents didn't need to be very complicated, and most importantly, to be shared with anyone else, I had started using Numbers and Pages instead of LibreOffice.
I'll have to revert to LibreOffice.
Click to expand...
Why? You can still use them AND they'll continue to receive updates. you just won't get access to free high quality images (which you didn't have access to before).
 
  • Like
Reactions: RevTEG
It's been a while and I know the demographic here changes often… So I wonder how many people even know that Apple removed a bunch of features from apps like pages and numbers, in order to make them function the same between iOS versions of the app and desktop versions. A lot of those features have never made it back into the desktop version of the app. It was very disappointing. If I had to guess I would say even with this subscription, you're still not getting back a lot of of the features that used to exist that a lot of people don't even know about. Numbers in particular definitely used to be much more useful with more features.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Tim Apple’s Glasses, Foxglove9, beltzak and 3 others
Anonymous123 said:
I. Hate. Subscriptions.

Apple’s greed seems to know no end.
Click to expand...

It's not really greed, it's capitalism, which is the current broadly-accepted business model.

The pricing is not outrageous, but it does add more pressure to consumers when they have to juggle paying for dozens and dozens of subscriptions.

I guess this was inevitable, but it's a sad day to see Apple caving to this approach.
 
Black_Mage said:
I just to say that I really don't like paying for software as a subscription. I think Microsoft first called it software as a service many years ago. I still prefer the buy once model. I also thought Pages, Numbers, and Keynote were free.
Click to expand...
They still are free. They're just adding a premium tier with some more AI features and access to a library of high quality images (something you'd now pay for outside of the app if you wanted it)
 
I am confused by this decision. I cannot see what would entice anyone to subscribe.

Also, how popular is iWork? I doubt it is popular and this move will make people ignore ot completely now. I want to use it, but everyone uses Office. I know documents can be converted from iWork to Office, but I don’t need to do this if I just use Office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Someyoungguy
This is just like adobe. Nope I will not do this. I would say some choice words but this website doesn't allow it. I'll wait for these to come out on other providers. This probably means OSX is not free anymore coming soon.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Urban Splash and Huck
I can probably live without the new features. These were never my main go to apps, although I used them occasionally. I actually worked a lot in the original final cut and Apple really screwed it up, which is when they lost me. Still, I bought them all. I think they may be overestimating the demand for some of their apps. I hate Adobe, but my work still depends on it. Can no longer say the same for final cut. The pixelmator pisses me off, though. And I say this as a loyal Apple guy.

Then again, this seems to be the way of the world. I have been paying for the NIK PLUG-INS SINCE THAT COMPANY WAS FOUNDED. GOOGLE EVENTUALLY BOUGHT IT AND MADE THEM FREE AND NOW DXO FORCES YOU TO UPDATE THEM EVERY YEAR OR TWO. Sorry for the caps. That was an iPhone glitch and I don’t feel like redoing it.

I don’t think this is a good idea, especially since the overall economy is not great right now. I’m not talking about the ridiculous stock market. But a lot of people appreciated getting the basic apple apps for free. And I guess if you don’t want some ******** AI content, they still will be.
 
gavroche said:
It's been a while and I know the demographic here changes often… So I wonder how many people even know that Apple removed a bunch of features from apps like pages and numbers, in order to make them function the same between iOS versions of the app and desktop versions. A lot of those features have never made it back into the desktop version of the app. It was very disappointing. If I had to guess I would say even with this subscription, you're still not getting back a lot of of the features that used to exist that a lot of people don't even know about. Numbers in particular definitely used to be much more useful with more features.
Click to expand...

Yup! I remember that pain in Pages! The features that were removed eventually came back, but it took way too long! Just needed text blocks to flow from one page to the next, and that was one features that was temporarily removed. It was a huge setback for my productivity.
 
Mainsail said:
So, going forward, will you not get a free version of iWork, iMovie, Freeform, and Garage Band when you purchase a new Mac, iPad, or iPhone? I wonder what that will do to hardware sales? Apple might be stepping over dollars to pick-up dimes.
Click to expand...

From what I have gathered from the (not very clearly written) article, it will stay the same for those who don't need AI features (and possibly premium stock stuff, which have never been included as freemium anyway).
 
For all of you that have been declaring that a 30% commission was too high for developers are you in even the smallest way surprised this is happening? Apple is a business, & they are in business to make money for their shareholders. I’ve seen this coming since Epic sued Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
nebojsak said:
From what I have gathered from the (not very clearly written) article, it will stay the same for those who don't need AI features (and possibly premium stock stuff, which have never been included as freemium anyway).
Click to expand...
Thanks for the clarification. I added to my earlier post to point out that IMHO a productivity suite without some basic AI integration is going to be almost useless in a few years. Just my view of where this is going.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoeSilver
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back