So you saw the internal papers confirming the price tag and specs?$3000 Bucks and I bet you can't even change the battery this is has got to be for those few folks with alot of disposable income🥸
So you saw the internal papers confirming the price tag and specs?$3000 Bucks and I bet you can't even change the battery this is has got to be for those few folks with alot of disposable income🥸
If only Apple had enough money to do both at the same timeI can’t help but think it would have been better for Apple to use all that time, effort and money into improving its existing products and services. Whilst I appreciate Apple venturing into new areas, there is a lack of focus on what it has already established
Yep I sure did thanks for asking.So you saw the internal papers confirming the price tag and specs?
If they'd let me augment my husband into George Clooney while we're getting it on between the sheets...The video depicted a man in a London taxi wearing an augmented reality headset calling his wife in San Francisco
Will this be the first flop of Apple in the last 15 years?
This device is not aimed at regular consumers, but if regular consumers are stupid enough to spend 3k on a new apple headset prototype just because "SHINY!!" then so be it, I'm sure Apple won't care.If that’s the case then regular consumers shouldn’t be paying $3000 for the headset. They should be paying developers an experimental discounted price.
No, that will be the Apple Car.This thing will be a car crash.
Health and activity trackers were an easy sell then and now.Found the first article posted by MacRumors about Apple Watch and people were actually very excited. Time flies!
Kind of a contradiction that doesn’t leave much room for answers, does it?What experience or activity can only be done through Apple’s headset and isn’t done better on a Mac or other current Apple or competitor product?
It’s tough for such a small company to have the resources to keep all those plates spinning 😃If only Apple had enough money to do both at the same time
This is the dumbest story I seen yet. It was discussed months ago, not even considered new or original. No way Apple would try to market something where little content exists for $3000.Some Apple employees are concerned about the usefulness and price point of the company's upcoming mixed-reality headset, The New York Times reports.
You have a point but I wouldn't put anything pass Apple. You know what makes sense. I know what makes sense. But Apple doesn't always do what makes sense. So I have no idea.This is the dumbest story I seen yet. No way Apple would try to market something where little content exists. Allow developers to buy DTK edition for early testing of AR content is the going theory of what will happen, not sell something not useful for $3000.
What experience or activity can only be done through Apple’s headset and isn’t done better on a Mac or other current Apple or competitor product?
They sure make a crapload of money for doing things that “make no sense”You have a point but I wouldn't put anything pass Apple. You know what makes sense. I know what makes sense. But Apple doesn't always do what makes sense. So I have no idea.
No way! Buy the 1st generation and sell it for $55,000 17 years later. Auction it off and they are going to love it!Even if you are interested, do not buy 1st gen.