Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've been dabbling with smart home (lights/music) in recent months and found Alexa to be pretty solid for my use cases. But I'm also now playing with HomeKit, which has been impressive so far at my place ... apart from 2 lights currently on HomeBridge on my Mac Studio I'm prepared to go either way depending on what these companies do. Whoever's service costs less and/or sucks less and meets my interests/needs will be who I go with ultimately.

In the world of IoT, ecosystems, subscriptiosn, and vendor-lock-in risks, designing for resiliency is absolutely critical.

Pretty much the same, unless they don't charge for turning your lightbulb on and off that is. It is a bit ridiculous though that the are only making AI to monetise it all,
when none of them ever paid any interest in monetising their assistants before.

But I'll see what happens like yourself, maybe play around with Home Kit although I'd have to buy new smart plugs to fully integrate it.
 
How much profit would you legislate?
It is not about legislation, it is about value for the price.

I would not care how much profit they generated if the software products were not bug ridden pieces of *&^%. In every case the software on Apple devices has better products that are not provided by Apple, but in the cases where Apple fails to allow 3rd party software, Apple's versions generally are terrible and bug ridden these days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9081094 and klasma
Glad they choose this path instead of increasing the price of the product or selling data of their users to 3rd parties to cover the cost of functionality.
But they'll happily take a percentage of sales from the millions of 'free' apps on their app store that do gather your data and sell it on. Need to remember that when Apple is virtue signalling over privacy.
 
Every piece of rumor/news that comes out makes it sound worse and worse. I hope some of these aren't true.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Fine with me, as long as not subscribing does not degrade the iPhone experience as it is today.
I wish the same. But highly unlikely. Take music app. Before apple music, it was nice, simple to use. Now they shove AM adds, and radio crap front and center. I have large library of my own collection, and now it is pain to use. Some features are gone, some are not working as they should. Total disaster. So color me skeptical, but I wish it will not interfere too much on the daily usage.
 
Pretty much the same, unless they don't charge for turning your lightbulb on and off that is. It is a bit ridiculous though that the are only making AI to monetise it all,
when none of them ever paid any interest in monetising their assistants before.

But I'll see what happens like yourself, maybe play around with Home Kit although I'd have to buy new smart plugs to fully integrate it.
Nah… Everything that runs on device is free, and everything that uses cloud will cost money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve09090
It is not about legislation, it is about value for the price.

I would not care how much profit they generated if the software products were not bug ridden pieces of *&^%. In every case the software on Apple devices has better products that are not provided by Apple, but in the cases where Apple fails to allow 3rd party software, Apple's versions generally are terrible and bug ridden these days.
Disagree. I don’t have bugs on my devices. I suspect in the case you are describing, it might be user error. I find the Apple products I have, great value. I just bought a PC Laptop during the week for legacy software because my eee PC finally died after 15 years. My god, there is a lot of trash out there. Low value PC junk. And it took 4 hours just to update it and 6 restarts out of the box! Thanks HP…. I could have seriously bought an M2 Mac Mini for less.
 
"useless" and then you list one useful feature... :)

You listed a ‘useful’ feature for a service you called ‘useless’ 😂😂 Oh dear. The irony is that AI would likely have picked up the grammatical blunder in your anti-AI rant post 😂

Haha, hoisted by my own petard. I'd say I was doing it sarcastically, but actually I'm an idiot. :rolleyes:
 
How else are they planning on getting around the rate limiting that happens with even paid subscriptions with chat gpt?
 
Apple really missed the boat with AI. Having to rely this heavily on ChatGPT did look pretty cheap during the iOS 18 reveal, not something I had expected from one of the biggest companies in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9081094
I read the newsletter—Gurman was clear that this could happen. He didn’t say he had sources saying it was happening. This is a sensationalized version of what he wrote. It might happen, but they have to prove AI works and is great before they charge for any part of it—this is all premature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjjacobson
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.