Turns out mine came with latest update installedyou need to be on macOS 12.3 for the update to be appear.
ThisMy came with the latest update already installed
Turns out mine came with latest update installedyou need to be on macOS 12.3 for the update to be appear.
ThisMy came with the latest update already installed
And we haven’t heard any complaints from those XDR users, have we?This is what the SD update actually contained; it was just inefficiently part of a large, overall OS version.
Studio Display Firmware Update 15.4
- Adds support for Boot Camp on Intel-based Mac computers
- Minor stability improvements
The XDR has had several software/firmware updates.
What’s new in firmware updates for Apple Pro Display XDR - Apple Support
Learn about changes and features included in firmware updates to Pro Display XDR.support.apple.com
All internet connected displays need updates, including most Smart TVs. I’d prefer more of a dumb monitor, but they’re becoming more difficult to find in higher resolution with greater pixel density. And the ones that you can get, often require running Windows if there is ever a feature update released.
well studio display doesn’t have much smartness, and no standalone airplay either.All internet connected displays need updates, including most Smart TVs. I’d prefer more of a dumb monitor, but they’re becoming more difficult to find in higher resolution with greater pixel density. And the ones that you can get, often require running Windows if there is ever a feature update released.
Until Apple pushes the customer to “upgrade“ the firmware and the update starts causing problems for the old hardware and the user can’t go back to the previous version.The monitor would still work on older firmware. Just like how iPhones still work on older firmware/OS.
Alarmism too much? Between the 2 “growing” threads it’s like 10 people having issues…
Did you read it?Your comparison does not actually demonstrate that the Studio Display is inferior to the LG 5K, except in regards to its stand, just that it's more expensive.
Obviously this is not True. If you need a monitor with more than 1.000$ it’s job related and an investment.Pretty much *any* monitor is objectively a bad investment because you don't buy monitors as an investment.
the studio display is objectively a downgrade for the money you pay and features you get compared to the LG UltraFine 5KIn addition the studio is *subjectivity* a downgrade.
Objective requires indisputable facts that cannot be denied. Given that the price and feature set puts the display on a decent price point for 5k monitors, people like it and are happy to buy it. In addition it has better speakers and a Webcam (irrespective of quality) than the LG. Ergo it cannot be *objectively* a downgrade
It's is objectively true that the sun is hot.
It is subjectivly true that the sun feels warm today.
They promoted it as the replacement for their display they discontinued for people to buy. So it’s not incorrectFirst off, considering the LG as the predecessor is incorrect. Apple had nothing to do with LGs display. They just sold it. It’s a competing product.
I never said the display is useless. I said true tone is useless for work as it distorts the colors, it’s neat as a consumer function.This display is not useless for professional work. Having done professional print and video workflows I can attest to that. I would love to know what basis you have there for that statement. I wouldn’t grade a Hollywood film on it, but it’s not useless. A good amount of “professionals” I’ve seen use a lot worse than this. A video editor is not going to need an XDR if he isn’t the one grading the film. That statement is just way off base with no context. For someone pumping out YouTube videos for a living like “Rene Getting Ritchie off Apple”, this display would meet his “professional” needs.
Such as? The list compared studio display,XDR, LG ultra fine 4K and 5K displays.Your own charts prove it is an upgrade over the LG and thereby being an upgrade from the Thunderbolt Display.
Unless your display is made of playdoYou want to save $300 and buy a display made of plastic that wobbles all over the table when you type, by all means have at it. The LG is the inferior product here as is the Thunderbolt Display. The Studio display is a well made product that will last a long time and superior to the LG in a few ways.
They have the exact same resolution and color accuracySure...if you're not fussy about resolution and color.
So you ignored where I said "except in regards to its stand,".Did you read it?
1599$ Studio display stand is only adjustable in 1 dimension. Tilt up or down
No height adjustment or vertical adjustment
1599$(+400$) studio display stand allows an extra up and down adjustment
No vertical adjustment
1599$ VESA is not standard but must be chosen at purchase and excludes as stand
No stand
Obviously this is not True. If you need a monitor with more than 1.000$ it’s job related and an investment
So you ignored where I said "except in regards to its stand,".
Supposedly Apple was involved in the LG display’s design.First off, considering the LG as the predecessor is incorrect. Apple had nothing to do with LGs display. They just sold it. It’s a competing product.
This display is not useless for professional work. Having done professional print and video workflows I can attest to that. I would love to know what basis you have there for that statement. I wouldn’t grade a Hollywood film on it, but it’s not useless. A good amount of “professionals” I’ve seen use a lot worse than this. A video editor is not going to need an XDR if he isn’t the one grading the film. That statement is just way off base with no context. For someone pumping out YouTube videos for a living like “Rene Getting Ritchie off Apple”, this display would meet his “professional” needs.
Your own charts prove it is an upgrade over the LG and thereby being an upgrade from the Thunderbolt Display.
You want to save $300 and buy a display made of plastic that wobbles all over the table when you type, by all means have at it. The LG is the inferior product here as is the Thunderbolt Display. The Studio display is a well made product that will last a long time and superior to the LG in a few ways.
Having a monitor that requires constant software updates is one of the craziest things that ever happened to technology.
Supposedly Apple was involved in the LG display’s design.
Sigh if you read your own definition for the word it would help and you would see I’m using the standard definition.![]()
Investment: How and Where to Invest
An investment is an asset, such as a stock or property, purchased to generate income or appreciate in value.www.investopedia.com
Sigh, what is it with folk these days redefining terms to meet what they personally believe?
To show how your argument holds zero water. Bob needs a computer to run his financials on. He buys a desktop PC. He also needs a keyboard and monitor. He pays $50 for the Keyboard and $199 for the monitor. It’s job related and therefore also qualifies in your terms as “an investment” in his business.
Not sure where you get to be the one who defines what does, and does not qualify as an amount - and usage.
Also, please stop using in the word “objectively”. It absolutely doesn’t mean what you think it means. Your opinion is that it isn’t as good - and that is a 100% valid opinion to have. However it is not a FACT. It’s an opinion.
![]()
"Subjective" vs. "Objective": What's The Difference?
Don't subject yourself to more confusion—learn the difference between "subjective" and "objective" right now and always use them correctly.www.dictionary.com
The rest of your reply is all opinion based.
n investment is an asset or item acquired with the goal of generating income or appreciation. Appreciation refers to an increase in the value of an asset over time. When an individual purchases a good as an investment, the intent is not to consume the good but rather to use it in the future to create wealth.
An investment always concerns the outlay of some capital today—time, effort, money, or an asset—in hopes of a greater payoff in the future than what was originally put in.
For example, an investor may purchase a monetary asset now with the idea that the asset will provide income in the future
I did. I gave you the example of Bob and his cheapo monitor. But apparently you feel that price matters, not functionality.Notice the bolden words I have highlighted for you. When you purchase a goods who’s main purpose is to make your business money.
Obviously this is not True. If you need a monitor with more than 1.000$ it’s job related and an investment.
?They're just getting it ready for the impending subscription service, 5k display for $2 a month, multi-monitor support for $6. ? I sure hope that doesn't happen but if car manufacturers make radios that require a subscription for wireless CarPlay who knows what others are capable of implementing.
Hey, I just had to update the firmware in my car. Updating a desktop display should be no big deal.It's a display. Why does a display need a firmware upgrade?
Bought a Philips 23" WUXGA monitor in 2004. Great purchase. Never fails. No SW updates required. Only need to dust it off once in a while ... with a regular cloth.
Functionality and price is irrelevant. I stated a general case.I did. I gave you the example of Bob and his cheapo monitor. But apparently you feel that price matters, not functionality.
It isYour words, not mine. If Bob needs a $199 monitor to run his accounting app to enable him to produce invoices for his business, then why is that ALSO not job related “and an investment”?
I’m referring to the Mac studio display forWhere does this $1,000 come from? If it was a number that you magic’d out of thin air then that’s a problem for you to address.