Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No, there are companies with no tattoo policies. Starbucks just two months ago altered their tattoo policy to allow visible tattoos while working.

Being inked is not a protected class.

Have you NEVER walked into an Apple store?

It's crazy diverse in there. Tattoos, colored hair, hell when I interviewed I killed some time by talking to a Native American employee who had a (really striking) necklace type thing (I really wish I knew what it was called).

Apple is not Wall Street.
 
Now, I have to say this.

Personally I am not a fan of such things on the body, but, it's a free choice and if that's your thing, then fair enough, it's a personal thing.

However, given that Apple has been testing the watch for such a L-O-N-G time out in the real world with real people, it's almost unbelievable that no one at all at Apple thought about this and tested this issue.

If it is an issue, they simply should of passed this info onto customers as a warning note before purchase, and to Apple store staff to point out also.

Does not mean there is anything wrong with the watch, just that Apple should of tested this, and informed people.

Either:

1: They never tested it, which seems utterly amazing if they never did.

2: They found out it was a problem, and simply did not say anything.
 
Actually, a lot of Apple store employees won't be able to get their heart rate...
 
I hope there comes a resolution as it was likely unforeseen. However, it was a choice to get a tattoo (as I have, as well, so...) and some options in life affect others in an unexpected way sometimes. I can't find it justifiable to blame a device for shortcomings outside of its control. Just need to find a different way, I suppose...

So glad to see one voice of reason here. Of course, it will be drowned out by all of the voices of unreason.

(By the way, I am not anti-tattoo. I have one myself - just not on my arms).
 
Have you NEVER walked into an Apple store?

It's crazy diverse in there. Tattoos, colored hair, hell when I interviewed I killed some time by talking to a Native American employee who had a (really striking) necklace type thing (I really wish I knew what it was called).

Apple is not Wall Street.

Never said it was, in fact, my original post said "I'm guessing". I'm not afraid to be wrong, I was just positing a possibility, and using Starbucks as another example.
 
Now, I have to say this.

Personally I am not a fan of such things on the body, but, it's a free choice and if that's your thing, then fair enough, it's a personal thing.

However, given that Apple has been testing the watch for such a L-O-N-G time out in the real world with real people, it's almost unbelievable that no one at all at Apple thought about this and tested this issue.

If it is an issue, they simply should of passed this info onto customers as a warning note before purchase, and to Apple store staff to point out also.

Does not mean there is anything wrong with the watch, just that Apple should of tested this, and informed people.

Either:

1: They never tested it, which seems utterly amazing if they never did.

2: They found out it was a problem, and simply did not say anything.

If I'm missing my left arm, that's a problem too, I guess Apple needs to solve? You can't solve all problems. I would have loved a detailed, technical paper on how the watch works, how all the new tech works, then people could have put 2+2 together to come up with that beforehand. But Apple was tight-lipped about everything for months. I mean that must have known this, but no big deal.

People who cannot tell time with an analog face... or people who can't read... they can't solve all problems.
 
Two Arms?

Wow, didn't see this coming. Either you dont use an apple watch or buy a new arm.

Or you just wear it on the other arm? :cool:

If you can't do that because both your arms have full sleeve tattoos extending beyond the wrist, I would submit to you that you've made some poor life decisions, but that's just my $0.02 :p
 
Amazing that people still think the "You're [doing whatever] wrong" quip is even remotely witty.

Amazing that people don't see the humor in the reapplication of relevant comments into todays tech discussions.

Totally relevant, totally on point and made even better by the fact that two guys posted the same comment within the same minute.
 
No worries, the trendy sleeve tattoo craze has almost run its course.

Darn hipsters. :confused:

I wouldn't be surprised if "shorter sleeves" become a thing as smartwatches become ubiquitous. That or "certified smart watch friendly" tattoo inks will take over the industry.
 
the watch detects your heart-rate by using a green light to best reflect your bloodflow. it's only natural that if you have some thick pigmented tattoos that this light would be unable to penetrate the skin and the watch be unable to give a clear reading

Most likely all the newer health monitors are going to have this issue...
 
So in four years of development, Apple has not once tested this on tattoos?

That's not at all surprising to me. I mean, how many people do you see with tattoos on their wrists? It's certainly not something most people would think of when creating test cases for this type of device, especially when there are a million other, more important considerations.
 
The severity of problem appears to depend on the color and ink saturation of the tattoo, with darker, solid tattoos causing the most interference

Are there any black Apple watch users on the forum? Does this problem only affect dark tattoos?
 
Seriously people...you tat yourself up to look like a circus freak and get all upset when your your fancy new optical sensors can't recognize you as having a normal skin tone. Really?

Normal skin tone? People come in lots of different colors and shades.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.