I'm guessing not without killing the battery (already using the heart monitor during exercise uses up more battery), certain inks with certain compounds, probably block nearly all light in all frequencies from going through (certain types of true black inks)
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Some Tattoos Found to Interfere With Apple Watch's Sensors
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I'm guessing not without killing the battery (already using the heart monitor during exercise uses up more battery), certain inks with certain compounds, probably block nearly all light in all frequencies from going through (certain types of true black inks)
No, but a lot of folks do. Btw, would LOVE to see your stats on this since you seem to have them on hand.
w00master
Yes, David Beckham, Angelina Jolie, Drew Barrymore, Megan Fox, Johnny Depp, Scarlett Johannson... they're all "circus freaks" because they have tattoos.
Careful... Your white, southern state republican is showing.
Last edited:
Actually there won't be with the sensor technology today. It's the same way with hospital pulse oximetry sensors on fingers. Certain shades of nail polish have to be removed or they won't work. It's not an absorbing issue as it is the light spectrum gets altered when it goes through the colors. So they then sensors can't read the light that is returned.
When it comes to tattoo's, what can you do. It is such a small population set that I would rather it work on the majority of people than them. That being said, I am extremely disappointed with the heart rate monitor thus far.
I am a fitness sensor fanatic, and the Apple Watch has been far less accurate/informative than the cheaper alternatives. Ive found it terrible for sensing peaks during weight lifting/intervals, and its taken the HR monitor 5-10 minutes to show an accurate number during outdoor runs.
I would rather the watch say acquiring than give me a BS metric like 175bpm when I know I would be around 135-140.
Luckily, the software on this device is far more advanced, so hopefully they make tweaks based off of the extensive data they are getting.
As of now, amazing smart watch, sub-par fitness tracker.
I am a fitness sensor fanatic, and the Apple Watch has been far less accurate/informative than the cheaper alternatives. Ive found it terrible for sensing peaks during weight lifting/intervals, and its taken the HR monitor 5-10 minutes to show an accurate number during outdoor runs.
I would rather the watch say acquiring than give me a BS metric like 175bpm when I know I would be around 135-140.
Luckily, the software on this device is far more advanced, so hopefully they make tweaks based off of the extensive data they are getting.
As of now, amazing smart watch, sub-par fitness tracker.
No it's on correctly - as it's on his right arm the crown is easily accessible for the left hand to press/ scroll, whereas if it was on the other side the wrist was in the way. I'm mildly glad for the pic as being a leftie I wear my watch on my right hand so I'm happy the screen can be flipped.
On topic, the green light idea is correct - most medical pulse oximeters use green light to reflect of the red cells to identify oxygenation.Most attach to fingers and I was taught that dark nail vanish might affect the reading, however anecdotal evidence doesn't seem to support this. Tattooed skin contains pigment through many layers of the skin (melanin is on one layer) so this is not surprising. The only alternatives I've seen are chest heart rate monitors, which work as a single lead ECG, but for the purposes of the watch are impractical. Affected individuals will have to send their watches back or remove their tattoos if they want to use the pulse function.
Extremely doubtful that they have a no tattoo policy, most companies these days do not.
How do you know Apple didn't test it? And if they did and found it didn't work with certain wrist tattoos is that enough of a reason not to use the technology? NO!
Wow... you love to stereotype, don't ya?
(Note; the fact SSonnetag's comment got a lot of upvotes is simply sad and awful. Come on Apple folks, you're better than this!)
w00master
The tattoo itself doesn't, but I would argue the act of getting one does. In all my years of tattoo research I've found that the dumbest amongst us are the quickest to get one.
HUh?
Feel free to show me yours, buddy. Since no tattoos are the default, I'm confident in saying that the vast majority of people do NOT have full-sleeve or wrist tattoos.
No, but a lot of folks do. Btw, would LOVE to see your stats on this since you seem to have them on hand.
w00master
Feel free to show me yours, buddy. Since no tattoos are the default, I'm confident in saying that the vast majority of people do NOT have full-sleeve or wrist tattoos.
I really don't think it's fair to attempt to turn this into a "gate" and I don't think the general public will either. (Not that "gates" ever really affect sales anyway.)
This is silly. A technology that was designed to see through your skin to be able to read your heart rate can't read through black ink--I'm sorry, but it's not Apple's job to account for things that aren't naturally supposed to be in your skin.
Hey, I have tattoos too, but I sure as hell wouldn't blame Apple if I had a tattoo sleeve on my arm and the watch couldn't read through it. It's just one of those unfortunate things that the current technology can't account for. If you have a sleeve tattooed on your arm and this is a deal breaker, simply don't buy an Apple Watch, or return the one you already bought. It's very simple.
This is silly. A technology that was designed to see through your skin to be able to read your heart rate can't read through black ink--I'm sorry, but it's not Apple's job to account for things that aren't naturally supposed to be in your skin.
Hey, I have tattoos too, but I sure as hell wouldn't blame Apple if I had a tattoo sleeve on my arm and the watch couldn't read through it. It's just one of those unfortunate things that the current technology can't account for. If you have a sleeve tattooed on your arm and this is a deal breaker, simply don't buy an Apple Watch, or return the one you already bought. It's very simple.
at which point did I say that ONLY hipsters had tattoos? Seriously - are you aware of the english language?
Apple is a company that should be inclusive of all people, not just the majority. Seeing all the snide, vulgar remarks in this thread only reminds me humans in general have a long way to go.
What's amazing is that Steve didn't realize what a ridiculous and arrogant thing that was to send into the wild.