I totally agree with both of you guys. Mind if I use that puck analogy in convos from here on out haha?
I think Gretzky and Jobs own it, not us!
I just mentioned that it applies to the design too.
Which btw all these android pads are missing the point on. They can't match the build and quality at the price of the current ipad so they make a poor imitation with a faster processer at a higher cost.
why not look ahead? they are stuck with googles software but not their own design, make something jetsons looking, something cool on its own merits, something *gasp* girls might want then they could maybe compete on some other angle.
My point being they haven't even managed to match up with iPad and iPad2 is going to be announced today with if reports are true a third version later this year so how the hell can they catch up? They can't they've got to take a punt ahead.
I wonder if that's what MS is doing or if they are just really that clueless. Win 8 for tablets sounds, well, lame.
WebOS has a chance but they have announced something for 6 months away. Ipad 3 territory perhaps.
It's crazy, iPad has been in development since before iPhone, and these OEMS expect to match it in a year or so? Can't see it myself.
As for the playbook. Jeee-ZUS! You have to use a blackberry for email and calendar linked to it? RIM have announced not one, not two, not three but four versions and released a grand total of.....NONE.
So while I am doing a bit of a rant it is also quite lucky that Apple actually have innovation in their DNA. Or at least Jobs does. They keep revising and updating and iterating. Even software, we usually get at least one big upgrade and a couple little ones of our iOS devices then one that pushes the limits of the previous device power wise but by that time new devices are soooooo desirable.
Brilliant tactics of course for continued purchasing and some say they leave features out of version one on purpose to sell version two, the counter argument is they wait until a feature is absolutely perfect and essential before adding. They start from a perspective of 'what can we leave out of this device to simplify' where others start from 'what can we stuff into this?'.
That leads to fundamentally different approaches.
And a $300b company it seems.