Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If that was 5-10% fee it might be a lot better then 15 to 30% fee. Apple is worth way more now, still the rich get richer and the poor developers less so.

Exactly. Imagine a smaller developer that can't afford to absorb the 30% loss in revenue for EVERY payment feature in their app. They are faced with creating a cut-down app that excludes any payment features or simply not developing for the platform at all. With that, why are some developers/companies exempt from the 30%? Because they are large enough to negotiate with Apple. Same cannot be said for smaller developers. So Apple's argument of wanting to create a "level playing field" for developers is absolute crap. The App Store polices are significantly outdated (created in a time where subscriptions and cloud services were really in their infancy) and NEED review and updating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pratikindia
Splotify will not let me offer my content at a fair price. I expect to be able to offer my material and be reimbursed $19.99 a play. It's my choice how much I get paid on their platform. If they don't charge enough to cover my costs that's their fault.
 
I disagree. Its more like, a customer comes into a store, says "I need your store to provide a service people are going to pay me for but you don't get anything." That is literally what they are requesting.

But do you really think they are entitled to a 30% cut of EVERY purchase?
 
its like Walmart promoting a sale of 50% off retail price if you buy it at Walmart instead of getting it directly from the manufacturer.

You mean:

Manufacturer advertising on the retail packaging a sale of 50% off retail price if you buy it directly from the manufacturer instead at Walmart where you did see the product. And when Walmart takes the product off the shelves, Manufacturer suing Walmart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cpfoto2005
If that theory would be true Apple would not lose a single cent by relaxing their rules to allow apps that offer in-app-purchases to also offer their own payment system.

unless the developer always makes the Apple version 30% more expensive, similar to what Epic literally just did today.
 
I gotta agree with Epic Games and Spotify on this one. Apple’s demands are quite extreme. They need to loosen their policies and stop demanding such a large chunk of the profits. Apple can still make lots of money without being so extreme.

Also, consumers have the right to install software on their own devices, from wherever they please. Can you imagine if Apple started forcing Mac users to only install apps from the Mac App Store? That would be disastrous. Yet that’s exactly what they’ve been getting away with on iOS all this time. It’s a dang shame.
No one is stoping people from jailbreaking their phones. Apple is just not going to be responsible for it. Thats all.
 
You mean:

Manufacturer advertising on the retail packaging a sale of 50% off retail price if you buy it directly from the manufacturer instead at Walmart where you did see the product. And when Walmart takes the product off the shelves, Manufacturer suing Walmart.
Walmart wouldn't sell if the package had ads undercutting them... It would be removed from the store
 
  • Like
Reactions: cpfoto2005
But do you really think they are entitled to a 30% cut of EVERY purchase?

Who should determine the margins a store owner charges if not the store owner?

Maybe US government should plan that a 13% margin is fair and force Apple to change that instead of 30%? Why not have US government also design the UX for the store or technology for the dev tools? Surely something beneficial for all parties will come from that...
 
Problem is they can't because there's no other way to make your app available on iOS.

To be clear, I think it's fine for Apple to decide what can and can't go on the App Store. But equally they shouldn't restrict users from installing apps from outside the app store.
Then apps will be damaging for the phone its better to have a safe app store
 
The problem is not Apple forcing their rules on their store. The problem is that they prevent any other method from getting an app on a device you own and justifying it with security claims.

Who says an alternative App Store isn’t safe by default?

Who says no one needs a ******* app?

Who says no one should pay via crypto on their phone?

Who says I shouldn’t be able to use a device I bought to its full potential?

Who says it’s okay to censor some telegram groups or other in app contents bc they don’t fit the device manufacturers values which they force upon u?

Apple does.

It’s just about power and control. And they have way too much. Epics move is brilliant and I hope it changes something.
 
Apple should have took a time-out right after the senate hearings in a show of good will. That alone would have gone a long way in cooling things off. Escalating things doesn't sound like a good plan.
A time out right now sounds like a good time also. Any show of good PR on Apple’s part would be good call.
.
Anyone vaguely recall a protracted legal battle with a company called Samsung? Then one with anoher called Qualcomm?
And these were ones where people had some sympathy towards Apple. Not so much here.
.
Apple, go to the corner and think about this. Seriously. Take a time out.
 
The Mac must be a horrible platform then. Extremely complex, everyone has dozens of third party app stores installed, and the performance must be so bad.

my chrome, adobe, native instruments, steam, firefox, EA origin, battlenet, microsoft office, alfred, logitech, setapp, and epic games launcher updater/background services would like to have a word with you.

good luck selecting the 8GB ram option for the iPhone...oh wait...
 
The problem is not Apple forcing their rules on their store. The problem is that they prevent any other method from getting an app on a device you own and justifying it with security claims.

Who says an alternative App Store isn’t safe by default?

Who says no one needs a ******* app?

Who says no one should pay via crypto on their phone?

Who says I shouldn’t be able to use a device I bought to its full potential?

Who says it’s okay to censor some telegram groups or other in app contents bc they don’t fit the device manufacturers values which they force upon u?

Apple does.

It’s just about power and control. And they have way too much. Epics move is brilliant and I hope it changes something.
Then by an android and you will be fine, if you dont like apples way just leave
 
Then apps will be damaging for the phone its better to have a safe app store

Thats the lie Apple keeps telling you. How can an app be damaging to a device by default? Maybe it’s just a feature Apple doesn’t want u to have. Like a clipboard manager.
[automerge]1597356767[/automerge]
Then by an android and you will be fine, if you dont like apples way just leave

it’s a brilliant device and I like their ecosystem. As a power user I just want more freedom.
 
I originally thought apple was in the wrong here, but as I thought about it I realized the scenario. Apple is providing a space & clientele for these businesses. Spotify and Epic want to be able to put their services in this space without paying a lease. It's like a masseuse going into a resort and saying "I'm going to do massages for your resort guests in your lobby that people will pay for, but you don't get anything for it."
 
You pay for a device and then you are FORCED to use a specific ecosystem.
I guess this is what they are going after.
Interesting to see what will happen.
But every single iPhone buyer is fully aware that if they buy an iPhone, they have to purchase apps through the Apple App Store. If a consumers doesn't like that, they can purchase a different phone from a different manufacturer. Apple doesn't even come close to have a monopoly on smart phone marketshare.
 
I'm not defending Apple, but just because some internet distribution and payment models were not regulated either by laws or by a private company in the 90s and everything seemed to be "free", doesn't mean that today you are entitled to use someone else's privately run and regulated infrastructure (that it's clearly designed to fit their business practices) so you can make money for yourself and pay whatever you think it's fair for you to pay to the owner. Sorry, but the real world doesn't work like this. Most complains and alliances by these so-called partner developers are clearly an attempt to negatively affect the public perception of the owner's infrastructure. Just shut up, get your product out of said network and affect their business practices with facts if your product is really that good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bayelrey80
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.