Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Again, you're all missing the point. Why should I have to buy another version of a movie I already have just because my computer can't play it? If I have a Blu Ray movie, and I want to take on vacation with me, I can't play it on my laptop. So I don't really have any other *legal* options other than renting on iTunes. But why would I want to pay for it again?

When I am on vacation, I don't take movies from home. I'm on vacation. I might take a movie for the kids, that is digital and they really don't care how the movie looks on the screen.
 
That's a broad sweeping statement based upon claiming OpenGL is the culprit.

Any OpenGL 3 compliant game that isn't leveraging nvidia or ati or NFS hardware specific GPU OpenGL extensions should port as expected, at least within the OpenGL code.

Every vendor has specific extensions not part of the OpenGL spec. The more a game leverages those the more they have to duplicate code and test against extensions available on each ported platform to match performance.


NFS as in, Need for Speed.

I know OpenGL is a very capable, much more so than directx, API, however the ports from windows based directX games are terrible. Native OpenGL games run GREAT.
 
The worst thing for Adobe at this point is that Steve Jobs just slagged all over their product.

When Apple sneezes, everyone grabs a kleenex.


Agree!

WTF! Tracfone? ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha rotfl, can't breathe,laughing so hard. :D

WTH is a Tracfone?
 
:eek:


It can't deliver the full console feeling without buttons. Also why would current gamers spend $500 to play inferior games? Bottom-line is you can't get games like Mass Effect 2, Uncharted 2, Bayonetta, Dragon Age, No More Heroes 2 etc... running on this thing. Yes it's more powerful than the PSP and DS but it lacks buttons and it doesn't fit in your pocket!

Do you see any reason why they *couldn't* make a game like Mass Effect 2 or Dragon Age for the iPad? The screen is certainly large enough, and they would control really well with touch... It would actually be easier to select a character and tap an action than it is with a mouse (and certainly better than selecting it with an arcade style controller).
 
:eek:

I highly doubt it! I'm an avid gamer that has purchased every console under the sun!(Atari Jaguar ugh :() And I wouldn't trade any of them in for an iPad! (I'm buying one but not for games)

Now don't get me wrong it's going to have some great games! But it's not a real threat to Nintendo, Sony or Microsoft! :)

It can't deliver the full console feeling without buttons. Also why would current gamers spend $500 to play inferior games? Bottom-line is you can't get games like Mass Effect 2, Uncharted 2, Bayonetta, Dragon Age, No More Heroes 2 etc... running on this thing. Yes it's more powerful than the PSP and DS but it lacks buttons and it doesn't fit in your pocket!

And for the record I do a ton of gaming on my iPhone(Touch-Arcade is one of my favorite sites). Still nothing beats the real thing! :D

GTA Chinatown Wars on the iPhone. Great touch controls are possible, and getting better every day.

Someday there will be no buttons. Prepare for it.
 
Not exactly!

As I said at the beginning of my comment, this issue is not relevant to this thread. I was responding to a fanboy making allegations about Gates.
Yes I know. In any event we added a little to the thread and we are now over a thousand posts so good has come from this.
One thing I assure you of, Steve Jobs is the most scrutinized CEO these days. If he were doing anything charitable, we would all know it. Some fanboys conveniently "assume" he is doing it "privately".
Privately or not, what I'm saying is that it is none of our business. More so I really want to know why you think it is so important for somebody to disclose things that are a private matter? As to to private giving there are private schools that owe their existence and continued operation to private donations, in some case from the big wigs on wall street. Is it really a problem for you that such giving is done privately?
I agree wholeheartedly with your comment with "But how is this a surprise anyways, people driven to build companies like MS seldom have the ability or empathy to understand the needs of others.", however, you seem not to apply this to Steve Jobs. He is no better.

No you read that wrong, it is about people that build companies like MS form the ground up. In that regard Steve is in many ways made from the same mold as are a lot or other successful businessman. There has actually been much studying of such personalities, how they lead and what makes them successful. It is not that one is better than the other it is just that one needs leadership abilities, vision and aggressiveness that common folks don't have. Part of that is a drive to push people and frankly not concern themselves with the impact of doing so, a lack of empathy if you will.

In a way this conversation is very iPad related. If the reports of his return to Apple are correct, he literally took ahold of the whole development and marketing process to push the tablet forward. It is that ability to get all the ducks in a row without regard to the personalities involved, that marks a good executive.
 
Nah, nah, nah! That post wasn't about Microsoft or your love/dislike for them. It was about the reversal theory taking affect on stans.

Yeah, Yeah yeah. We get you. It's just not true. Sorry.

There are a million reasons why your argument might work with something else, like Sports Teams. I could be a Lakers fan one year, and a Celtics fan the next. Wouldn't bother me. Maybe I moved. Maybe my color preferences changed; maybe a player I like switches team. Whatever. You lose some, you win some with any team. Big deal. Maybe I just like Basketball period. One team gets a new coach and starts doing better. Whatever.

Some people might even say this about cars. If you drive for a living or spend hours per day in your car, maybe it makes a difference to you whether you drive a comfortable car or a Yugo. Others will stand by a preference for BMW over Mercedes. Me, I'd take either one.

But if your computer is your tool, and you are using it hours per day and you have to accomplish certain things: then chances are you have made a choice about certain aspects of that tool. Most diehard Mac users (Fanboys to you) have used both platforms (have had to) and make an informed decision -- a decision designed to save themselves frustration.

So, sorry, but I don't agree. I don't care what it is called, I would use the one that we are calling the Mac, because at the end of the day, if I want toast, I want to use a toaster, not stick my bread on a fork and hold it over a fire.
 
1) Multitasking can setill be performed even without applications sharing the whole screen. Suppose youre chatting with someone over AIM or Fring, and you get a link to Safari. Youre not going to quit one app to go to the other and then quit that to go BACK to the other, are you? My Nokia E71 allows multitasking. Its never occured to me, but if it didnt, i'd find it VERY annoying. I switch between applications on my nokia all the time, particularly when looking at web page information i want to send to a friend via text message. There are of course other cases, but its clear that the lack of multitasking is unforgiveable.

I doubt the iPad can't do this, since the existing iPhone can. I can, for example, use the Voice Memos app, switch to something else, and keep recording. I can start a text message, go do other things such as find a web page and copy the link, then come back and continue the message as if I'd never left. So I'd be quite surprised if the iPad couldn't do likewise. Generally people use the term multitasking to mean running the apps "side by side", not what you are describing. Either way, the iPhone works the way you describe and I can see no logical basis for a claim the iPad won't.

With regards to Flash vs. HTML5 YouTube, arguably one of the largest Flash based websites for the general public, is moving to HTML5 over Flash.
 
Got torched by who, the iPhone and iPod were also ''torched'' and we all knownthr miserable failures those were.

Ummm, where was the iPhone torched? It was heralded as a game changer from the minute it was unveiled. The iPod was mostly torched for its price (iPod = "idiots Price our devices"). The iPad is not being hit for its high price -- it's being hit because it is blasé.
 
EVERYONE is out to kill the iPhone, hence everyone's feverish attempts to address it by copying it.

I've got news for you, all that 'iCrap" is EXACTLY what the Average User needs and what will give the Average User a better computing experience. I'm all for the philosophy behind this.

That's fine. IF you want to be an AVERAGE company pandering to the lowest common denominator.

As for me, it's a PC, windows XP, and BD Powerstation. I've had it.

Bye Steve-O.

:apple:
 
The "We'll be back soon." sign is a misleader, it's more like "We'll be back when we feel like it, probably a few hours so sucks for you." lol
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.