I thought it was a great film, but I did feel you needed a bit of background knowledge already to understand it all.
Why would I want to support or even see a (reluctantly self-described) fictitious movie that pretends to be an authentic biopic to portray someone in a negative light. Cook nailed it on the head, "opportunistic"
Many adopted children have abandonment issues, are OCD, control freaks, and have tons of relationship issues.
I was adopted and suffered from all of the above. It didn't get married until I was 35. That my friend wasn't by choice either. It was more about creating a perfect environment for my child.
It took me 35 yrs to get over issues..I can't even imagine doing that as Steve Jobs. I think this is the first film that talks about being adopted and how those issues manifest around you as you go through life and you're daily interactions with others. All adopted children have their own reality distortion fields.
As the first full weekend in theaters for Aaron Sorkin and Danny Boyle's Steve Jobs film comes to a close, early box office results have been disappointing, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Estimates put the film's take at $7.3 million from nearly 2,500 theaters, well below expectations and only good enough for seventh place on the weekend.
The film has generally received a positive reception from critics, particularly for Michael Fassbender's portrayal of Jobs. Those more familiar with Jobs' history and those closest to him have, however, been less satisfied with the film, in many cases taking issue with the way Jobs is portrayed and some of the artistic license that deviates significantly from actual events.![]()
Michael Fassbender as Steve Jobs and Seth Rogen as Steve Wozniak in 'Steve Jobs'
Article Link: 'Steve Jobs' Disappoints in First Full Weekend With 7th-Place Box Office Showing
Uh...The film wasn't made by Apple, you know that , right ?That this film was ever made is typical of Apple's "the world revolves around us" attitude.
From what I understand the movie took extensive liberties in its description of Jobs. I haven't read the comments by Sorkin, but Woz claiming its accurate doesn't mean anything to me as he has brain damage and regularly says things he shouldn't and that make no sense.
I'll probably see it at some point, but I won't pay for a movie that uses "artistic license" to badmouth a great man.
early box office results have been disappointing
I think at this point it will wind up in the $5 bin at Wally World.
All of that wouldn't have been so bad if it had turned out to be an entertaining movie. However, it turned out to be pretentious twaddle suitable only for drama queens. This video review of the film by one of MacRumors' own gets it right...I don't really want to see a movie thats called "Steve Jobs" that is barely based on his life and contains many inaccuracies according to the people that new him.
Wow, a real live normal person on Macrumors, I must be dreaming.Not surprised really. I mean, I'm probably not the only one who likes Apple PRODUCTS, not the religion or cult or the figureheads or politics.
I'm not interested in the people who made my toaster or my car or my television either. Why should my computer be any different?
No, if it actually was about Steve Jobs I might have seen it. People aren't interested in a fictional movie called Steve Jobs. Specially a movie that basically ignores the last 15 years of his life.For the general masses and the casual movie goers, I doubt they would want to go and watch another movie about Steve Jobs.