Isn't the guy with the sun glasses John Lennon? Which brings me to my next question, if that is John Lennon, where are the beatles?
Actually I think that's Ozzy...
Isn't the guy with the sun glasses John Lennon? Which brings me to my next question, if that is John Lennon, where are the beatles?
Originally posted by MattG
Actually I think that's Ozzy...
Originally posted by G4scott
I believe that this site will barely make it, or go down in flames, and here's why.
1.) With the DRM, you don't know what you can do with one song to the next, since each song can have different restrictions.
2.) Their pricing model is like a fat man in a little coat... They advertise 79¢ per song, but I have yet to see one of those songs. They are probably for independent artists, which much fewer people will buy from. After browsing around, the iTunes Music Store is either the same price, or cheaper than buymusic. There are also albums that have certain tracks unavailable, that are available on the iTunes Music Store. I haven't run across any songs higher priced that 99¢, but I'm sure they're out there...
3.) The only people who are going to use this are grandmas and grandpas, or families that have no clue about computers at all. Hardcore, or even normal computer users will still use p2p networks for their music because it's free, and there's no restrictions. Buymusic is "The Music Store for the Dumb."
4.) You can only listen to music on your computer, or on about 5 different portable audio players. Apple should make a commercial to counter that, showing a guy listening to music on his PC that he bought with buymusic.com, wearing that "get loaded" t-shirt, and his mom comes in to vacuum the carpet, his siblings start to watch TV, and his friends come over, and he can't listen to his music. Then, they should show a kid using a Mac, with an iPod, and the iTunes Music Store, and when his mom comes into the room to vacuum, he takes his iPod with him, and when he gets distracted there, he moves somewhere else, and when his friends come, they go out for a night on the town in their VW beatle, with their music playing from the iPod. It would show how much better the iTunes Music Store is. Apple could also make another commercial where a kid with a CD player is burning a CD, and then the CD gets damaged, and he burns another, and that one gets buried by the dog, and he burns another, and that one gets stolen, and oops, he can't burn any more CD's... Which brings me to my next point:
5.) What if you move to another computer? What if a virus erases your HD? What if a CD fails to burn properly? There are too many risks that come with using a PC to make buying music with such a strict DRM enjoyable. You'd spend all your time protecting your music library, and less time enjoying it.
6.) You can't put music into movies you make. Or at least I doubt you can. With such a strict DRM, I doubt you can do much than listen to your music. You can't put it into a home video or anything like that, where with the iTunes Music Store, you can put it into movies, and burn them onto DVD's.
7.) Their website sucks. There is no customization. Browsing music is a horrible experience, since it just shows things by song, using up at least 30 pixels a row... the iTunes Music Store uses a standard line in a list to display information about a song. It also makes it easy to find albums too, and it doesn't restrict it to 20 results per page. Using their website is a pain, and I'd be surprised if any of their 'dumb' customers who would actually buy music from them could find the music they want.
8.) Windows Media Player. Enough said. I don't feel I need to rag on why using a codec owned by m$ is a bad idea...
I've decided to buy an album from the iTunes Music Store today, and maybe more later on when I have the money. The album, "Anthem", by Less Than Jake, is nowhere to be found on the BuyMusic site...
I also have another question about their store... On their main logo:
![]()
Isn't the guy with the sun glasses John Lennon? Which brings me to my next question, if that is John Lennon, where are the beatles?
Hopefully this will do Apple some good. When this store fails, hopefully the big 5 will realize that an Apple-style, looser DRM is required to actually sell music online. People may still pirate, but it will be much easier to obtain music legally, and having a few people buying music is better than none.
Originally posted by MattG
Hello Matt,
Thank you for contacting buy.com.
We apologize for any problems you have encountered with BuyMusic.com.
We appreciate your comments and suggestions and will use them to help
improve our products and services when making future decisions. Thanks
again for your feedback.
We appreciate your business.
Sincerely,
BuyMusic.com
www.BuyMusic.com
Original Message Follows:
------------------------
Order Number:
Too bad Apple's service blows yours out of the water. Too many
restrictions. Once the iTunes Music Store is ported for Windows, your
service will be doomed. Like usual, Apple innovates and you guys
imitate--nice commercials!
What is SACD? It looks just like a normal CD, but thats where the similarity ends. The difference in sound quality is so great that you have to hear it to believe it! SACD represents the highest quality sound source available today.
Originally posted by Lord Bodak
From the BuyMusic site:
So here are the questions. What if I get a new computer and get rid of my old one? My primary license is now gone? Even if I had full rights from both computers, what if I am out of "download" credit for a track but I get a new machine?
And since you have to use the site to get the secondary license, what if they go under? My music is now trapped on my PC forever?
I don't know much about SDMI, but how do they limit the number of burns? It seems they would also have to use the website for that (or can the music actually store how many burns are remaining? If so, I imagine someone would find a way to hack the file to increase the count). So if they went under, you couldn't even burn to CD...
My opinion: doomed from the start.
Originally posted by kaltsasa
I tend to agree, I was an emusic subscriber. While it was great for a couple months, I quickly ran out of decent music to get from them.
Originally posted by a_kim
I'm buying an album today. Who's with me?![]()
Originally posted by ZildjianKX
I see sooo many posts complaining about other online music stores... jeez, don't you guys want to see some competition? Brings prices down... the fact that Apple has pretty much ignored competition on their computer lines is why their prices can be so high.
Originally posted by freundt
Sorry,
not to troll, but Steve was not a visionary when it comes to iTMS. He was just able to do what emusic and alot of other services were not - Convinve the big 5 to give him less restricitve DRM.
Emusic service has no DRM (At least when I used it TWO YEARS AGO) uses mp3 as the format and you are free to do whatever with all the files. So what was the downfall of Emusic? The big 5 refused to participate.
PressPlay, MP3.com, etc.. There are tons of services that came out before iTMS with the only caveat being more DRM.
So.
Once again.
Not to troll, but iTMS is visionary only in that it got the big 5 to participlate with less DRM. (and I think that is because it uses such a little used audio format on a platform with < 5% user base. - no to disparage the audio format - it's just not supported as widely as mp3 or wma)
Felt like that needed to be said considering all the "the Window's world copied Apple again and does it poorly again" comments.
Originally posted by synergy
Once Apple comes along with their better food, guess what?
Buy.com folds faster than Ben Folds 5.![]()
Originally posted by ZildjianKX
I see sooo many posts complaining about other online music stores... jeez, don't you guys want to see some competition? Brings prices down... the fact that Apple has pretty much ignored competition on their computer lines is why their prices can be so high.