If you are not a pro user and you already have a miniDV camcorder that works but requires FW, what are you to do?
According to Steve Jobs, chuck the old, get a new sub par USB camera, and be a hap hap happy Apple customer.
If you are not a pro user and you already have a miniDV camcorder that works but requires FW, what are you to do?
Why are they buying Macs again?Sorry guys but most people I know don't even have Internet.
Really? Then what does this mean on the description page
if it's not usb to firewire??
Yes there is. This was just the first thing that came up. Comes in NTSC and a PAL version.
http://www.usbfirewire.com/Parts/rr-527950.html
Hmmmm, says not Mac compatible though![]()
USB was originally designed for lower data peripherals like mice, printers ( back when ), ... and added mainly a smaller universal connector and hot-pluggability. Of course, also some speed. However, the base technology isn't well for high bandwidth. This isn't overly technical but the reason USB ( 2.0 or otherwise ) is really unstable in performance is that it is a slave kind of technology. It uses the CPU and system bus to perform. FireWire chipsets do most of the work themselves and use very few CPU cycles and the rest of the system. That's also why FW devices can communicate with each other without a computer or computer-type of devices between them. The IEEE 1394 ( FireWire ) architecture is much more suitable for 3200Mbits than USB is.
Good lord I spent a month researching to buy my car.
I wouldn't go that far. Because my Cube has no PCI slot, I bought a FireWire/UltraSCSI converter for my LTO drive. At 20 MB/s, it's slow and the tape cannot run continuously, but it's a last-resort solution.
So, it might be possible to packetize the FireWire protocol through gigabit ethernet, sucking up CPU power, and with my doubts about how it would perform for real-time stuff like capturing DV.
Don't be surprised if such a horrible solution costs around $100, and not the $5 or something an onboard port would cost. After all, that's about the price of my lame SCSI converter.
Anyway, it seems pretty clear that most people here are rather upset about Apple's decision. But surely there is some reason for it. Maybe a 13" MBP?
According to Steve Jobs, chuck the old, get a new sub par USB camera, and be a hap hap happy Apple customer.
I realise this product is only available now for Windows but maybe it could be developed to be used on a Mac.
http://www.pixela-1.com/captycable/system.htm
I think we all have. And I still haven't seen any evidence that these online petitions work.
Exactly. $400 gets you FireWire AND the two video cards. Not much considers the cost of FCPro and a DV camera....
I think we all have. And I still haven't seen any evidence that these online petitions work.
They are slower, and their content is compressed. True DV can only be used with FireWire.How are USB cameras sub-par? Just curious
Doubt it, they would have introduced that on Tuesday. The only logical reason I can come up with is to differentiate the MacBook and the MacBook Pro more, thus making FireWire users get the more expensive Pro.
The solution would have such poor performance that no one in their right mind would choose such an adapter over simply buying a different computer in the first place. Besides which I don't think it's a performance issue. I think the two technologies operate in such a different way that it isn't possible to bridge the gap and create such a monster.
This is really the most amazingly bad decision I've ever seen Apple make.
How are USB cameras sub-par? Just curious
I think we all have. And I still haven't seen any evidence that these online petitions work.
It did work last time.
The first MacBook Pros had no FireWire 800.
At least it's something concrete to show numbers.
I think we all have. And I still haven't seen any evidence that these online petitions work.
They are slower, and their content is compressed. True DV can only be used with FireWire.