Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
And that is why the Macbook Pro has firewire and the macbook doesn't.

The macbook is like a small macbook pro, this would eat macbooks pro sells, what can do apple against that fact? remove firewire from the consumer notebook, and left it only on the prosumer notebook.

This way prosumers would buy macbooks pro and consumers macbooks

All fine and dandy, untill you realise that the last generation Macbooks and even iBooks had Firewire, and that powerbooks, and (with one notable exception) had TWO FW ports. Add to that they downgraded (again!!) to an inferiour FireWire chipset causing people all sorts of problem.

You guys really need to stop running around acting all apologetic about Apple's behaviour. Differentiation? Go take a look at the previous generation MBs and MBPs, and then - for the love of god - stop thinking apple's products live in a vacuum. Go take a look at the competition, or even just last generation MBs and MBPs.

No, the thing is, Apple doesn't have a pro laptop anymore. the 15" MB is a high priced, sub-spec'ed consumer notebook.
 
Why do you insist on using pro-cameras on a frigging CONSUMER-laptop? Sheesh....

You forgot to include "Apple´s only small form factor & portable". Besides, don´t think only A/V people care about FireWire, other industries with the same wish for something small but powerful enough do to.
 
So to summarise the impeccable logic of the Apple apologists on this thread:

- firewire is old technology, so how come it's on the more advanced laptop

- according to Jobs, all camcorders these days use USB, which is demonstrably untrue

- buy a USB-to-firewire lead, which doesn't exist for macs

- firewire is for pros only, which contradicts the 'old technology' justification and ignores those customer segments who aren't pros or are poor pros

- this is transitional pain like the switch from floppy disc to cd-drives, except those with firewire haven't been offered any alternative (let alone superior alternative) unlike those who had floppies but switched to CDs

- not enough room for a firewire port, but there is in some equally small-form PC laptops

Have I missed out any?

- We should follow the will of Lord Steve and trust that he knows what is best for us the consumers/professionals.
 
All fine and dandy, untill you realise that the last generation Macbooks and even iBooks had Firewire, and that powerbooks, and (with one notable exception) had TWO FW ports. Add to that they downgraded (again!!) to an inferiour FireWire chipset causing people all sorts of problem.

You guys really need to stop running around acting all apologetic about Apple's behaviour. Differentiation? Go take a look at the previous generation MBs and MBPs, and then - for the love of god - stop thinking apple's products live in a vacuum. Go take a look at the competition, or even just last generation MBs and MBPs.

No, the thing is, Apple doesn't have a pro laptop anymore. the 15" MB is a high priced, sub-spec'ed consumer notebook.

Amen to that.
 
Why do you insist on using pro-cameras on a frigging CONSUMER-laptop? Sheesh....

First of all I'm a pro. Second its not about pro or consumer cams. Its about interface that works best. Why do you think all the pro stuff uses FW if SDI and variants are not used? Because its better then USB! Apple owns FW! There is no reason to cut it from their line of products. Third, I own many Mac's and if I'm on location shooting with Red I want the kit to be as light as possible. Macbook is lighter and smaller. Since there is no need for transcoding at this point I don't need lots from GPU or CPU.

Anyway, many of the cams on that site are prosumer. Not professional cams. If you can't use MacBook with a prosumer cam then what kind of crap shooter are you going to connect it with...
 
USB to FW convertion...

Just for fun i thought id give something a try to see i it was maybe possible to use firewire through the usb ports... I have a Lacie rugged drive which has FW400, FW400 and USB. When i have the drive connected to my MBP through the FW 800 port i can plug my cameras FW400 cable into the drives FW400 port and i am able to capture footage onto FCP as if it was plugged into the computers FW port... Anyways i though well if I connect the drive to the computer through the USB port then plug my camcorder into the FW on the external drive maybe it would work. So i tried doing that and it didn't work, FCP couldn't even detect the camcorder... So i suppose this kinda proves that the USB-firewire adapter idea doesn't have much chance of working.
 
Just for fun i thought id give something a try to see i it was maybe possible to use firewire through the usb ports... I have a Lacie rugged drive which has FW400, FW400 and USB. When i have the drive connected to my MBP through the FW 800 port i can plug my cameras FW400 cable into the drives FW400 port and i am able to capture footage onto FCP as if it was plugged into the computers FW port... Anyways i though well if I connect the drive to the computer through the USB port then plug my camcorder into the FW on the external drive maybe it would work. So i tried doing that and it didn't work, FCP couldn't even detect the camcorder... So i suppose this kinda proves that the USB-firewire adapter idea doesn't have much chance of working.

You can't daisy chain USB, only FireWire—one of its many benefits.
 
Just for fun i thought id give something a try to see i it was maybe possible to use firewire through the usb ports... I have a Lacie rugged drive which has FW400, FW400 and USB. When i have the drive connected to my MBP through the FW 800 port i can plug my cameras FW400 cable into the drives FW400 port and i am able to capture footage onto FCP as if it was plugged into the computers FW port... Anyways i though well if I connect the drive to the computer through the USB port then plug my camcorder into the FW on the external drive maybe it would work. So i tried doing that and it didn't work, FCP couldn't even detect the camcorder... So i suppose this kinda proves that the USB-firewire adapter idea doesn't have much chance of working.

Well, let's just say that it WAS possible to have firewire over USB, why does connecting a camcorder to harddrive prove anything? it would have to have not only the wiring going from one connector to the other, but it would also have to have a "translater" inside in order for that to work.

Anyway, even if you bought a USB plug and resoldered your FW-cable it wouldn't work.
 
Just for fun i thought id give something a try to see i it was maybe possible to use firewire through the usb ports... I have a Lacie rugged drive which has FW400, FW400 and USB. When i have the drive connected to my MBP through the FW 800 port i can plug my cameras FW400 cable into the drives FW400 port and i am able to capture footage onto FCP as if it was plugged into the computers FW port... Anyways i though well if I connect the drive to the computer through the USB port then plug my camcorder into the FW on the external drive maybe it would work. So i tried doing that and it didn't work, FCP couldn't even detect the camcorder... So i suppose this kinda proves that the USB-firewire adapter idea doesn't have much chance of working.

That has nothing to do with an adapter. Your enclosure is not an adapter.
And the right way would be a gigabit ethernet/FireWire adapter, which although it might be possible, it doesn't mean it would work acceptably for audio/video. Don't be surprised if such an adapter would go for at least $100, instead of the couple bucks a native port in the computer would cost.
 
Just for fun i thought id give something a try to see i it was maybe possible to use firewire through the usb ports... I have a Lacie rugged drive which has FW400, FW400 and USB. When i have the drive connected to my MBP through the FW 800 port i can plug my cameras FW400 cable into the drives FW400 port and i am able to capture footage onto FCP as if it was plugged into the computers FW port... Anyways i though well if I connect the drive to the computer through the USB port then plug my camcorder into the FW on the external drive maybe it would work. So i tried doing that and it didn't work, FCP couldn't even detect the camcorder... So i suppose this kinda proves that the USB-firewire adapter idea doesn't have much chance of working.

FCP doesn't capture with USB. Nor will Avid.

EDIT: To make it clear you need FW to capture with FCP. If you want some higher band you need capture card with SDI etc. or use something like Kona IO which gives you SDI and connects to Mac using FW. Forget USB->FW adapters and all that crap. They don't work.
 
So to summarise the impeccable logic of the Apple apologists on this thread:

- firewire is old technology, so how come it's on the more advanced laptop

- according to Jobs, all camcorders these days use USB, which is demonstrably untrue

- buy a USB-to-firewire lead, which doesn't exist for macs

- firewire is for pros only, which contradicts the 'old technology' justification and ignores those customer segments who aren't pros or are poor pros

- this is transitional pain like the switch from floppy disc to cd-drives, except those with firewire haven't been offered any alternative (let alone superior alternative) unlike those who had floppies but switched to CDs

- not enough room for a firewire port, but there is in some equally small-form PC laptops

Have I missed out any?

Why can't the anti-firewireists just admit the plain and simple truth?

- this was a marketing decision to differentiate the Macbook from the Macbook pro and drive more sales to the latter
- they could have opted for much sounder means to differentiate the two (adding more features like eSATA to the Macbook Pro)
- they didn't because that would mean a lower profit margin
- Jobs' factually incorrect riposte shows how out of touch they are with significant sections of their customer base

IMO, with a severe global recession about to happen, this decision will bite them on the as* and deservedly so. Will look into hackintosh for my next 'mac' purchase
Right Apple will fail because they left out firewire on a Macbook, give me a freaking break. :rolleyes:
 
Right Apple will fail because they left out firewire on a Macbook, give me a freaking break. :rolleyes:

Let's just wait until MWSF in January and see if they bring back FireWire on the MacBook because of poor sales.

It was the best selling Mac not only because Joe Bloggs bought it, but because it was an ideal, compact yet powerful solution for many pros too, where the MacBook Pro was too over priced or too big to carry.
 
the problem of apple are its fanboys. I despise them.
I am not disappointed because of the FW, but because of the poor quality displays
 
the problem of apple are its fanboys
I despise them

What's a fanboy? Somone who denies Apple got it wrong even when they ARE wrong? I'm a huge fan of Apple products - but I'm also the first to criticise them if I'm not happy with something.

Mac's don't crash - right? (how many kernel panics did my Mac Pro have for the first few months before Apple updated the audio drivers...).
 
It's called "saving a dollar" and "catering to the lowest common denominator". No more, no less. They have become "The iPod Company". Willingly even.

And allowing the machine to be as thin as possible. Apple doesn't maker computers for the above average user anymore. They make fads for the average consumer with disposable funds.

Up until last week a MacBook was more then enough.

Apparently my 5 year old ibook is for pros.

Replying to myself, but good lord: LOOK AT ALL THE CHOICE WE USED TO HAVE. What happened?

:(

Ive and Jobs letting success get to his head. That's usually when he screws up.
 
It was mentioned earlier. That the MBP is really not a "pro" machine. Apple tells us it's "pro", but in reality it is consumer grade like the MB. So then why did they leave FW800 on the MBP (a consumer product)?
 
Let's just wait until MWSF in January and see if they bring back FireWire on the MacBook because of poor sales.

It was the best selling Mac not only because Joe Bloggs bought it, but because it was an ideal, compact yet powerful solution for many pros too, where the MacBook Pro was too over priced or too big to carry.

Right and just like they brought it back on the iPod because of poor sales or brought back the floppy. A few whiners on the net won't change Apple's mind or affect their sales. For every whiner out there, there are hundreds of thousands more who will buy these machines. Good luck on waiting for them to bring it back.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.