they should have combined all the lines and made one line and then release multiple products from that line, just what samsung is doing with their galaxy line, it would have resulted in much higher sales and media attention.
You might like to try LUA on an iPad.
Codea is the app.
Let's go with that, then compare it to both these cards used externally with Thunderbolt, comparatively they have lot's of more bandwidth internally. I think you may need to go back and look at the first post again, the comparison was with GPUs on Thunderbolt.
Of course, but do you know the difference between a demo and nothing at all, or the difference with marketing material and real tests? Together with the MARI demo and the rest that is currently known means I remain optimistic about it until I know more. A real world review would of course be more interesting, but then we would not have this discussion.
Tell me something newYes, Jobs was a good salesmen.
. Even the best tool/API/SDK cannot make that easy.
Wiring GPU via TB is, at best, naive- if one were going to wire external GPU then you'd want external PCIe, but I'm guessing Apple can't make much money out of ePCIe... You made a comment about the bandwidth, with GPU performance matters, of which "bandwidth" is a mere component. "Bandwidth" of a GPU is meaningless in itself- no matter what the speed limit is on a road, there's only so fast that you can pedal your bicycle... What Apple is doing with the iBin is stopping you from getting off the bicycle they provide and getting onto something better/different...
I've taken the marketing materials and dissected them - based on that, it looks like the iBin is just a "box" with expensive tech in it, and not a "pro" machine by any means...
There are plenty of tales of people drowning in floods while "optimistically" waiting at the top of their houses for their God to save them and refusing help from mere mortals...
That looks cool! I love this kind of thing and I will try it.
But I wouldn't necessarily anoint it the next great easy software development platform. It might be, but so many of these things lack the depth to be useful much past the included templates.
I think where these kinds of development environments are successful is where they make something that is conceptually easy or intuitive also technically easy to achieve. And it need to be applicable to a wide area of problems. This is not easy to do... the environment needs to have a gentle learning curve and yet be quite deep and flexible.
And in the end, I think there will always be areas in a give software development project that are not conceptually easy or intuitive. Even the best tool/API/SDK cannot make that easy.
No, he was a perfect visionary. The iPod click wheel interface has been shown to many CEO's before Jobs and he was the one who actually realised that one could build an amazing music player around that interface. That's even more important than actually inventing the interface. There are millions of people inventing amazing stuff every day in the tech world. It takes someone like Jobs to look at what others are doing and building the next big thing in tech using other peoples ideas. The biggest genius is the one which can use other people's ideas, not the one which finds great ideas itself. The second kind is much more common.
This once more shows that S Jobs was not the big visionary many people believe he was.
A LOT of try and error before he got lucky with the iPhone.
And without the iPhone's success no one would remember him for OS X or anything else he and Apple did.
Good IT pioneer but completely overhyped.
Uhm, Thunderbolt is PCIe ...
No it's not- and even Apple documentation shows that. There is a "thunderbolt controller" (which is PCIe GEN2) between the PCIe and a thunderbolt device. You need a thunderbolt controller on each end. The story is entirely different with ePCIe, which is a direct link without any form of intermeddling...
Or perhaps it's an example of a user who sees the value of internal expansion, without the need for external, dust bunny-gathering houses."uselessly expensive ports on the back" ?
The above is just a typical example of an uneducated user who doesn't understand the value of Thunderbold or USB-3.
The new mac pro is going to be a powerhouse with almost unlimited expandability.
If we could afford CATIA, do you think we would have Solidworks licenses?Just for the record, 100,000 part assemblies on SolidWorks are outliers, Black Swans, not moderate assemblies, and nobody runs full assemblies without "lightening" the data set and working on subassemblies anyway. Why isn't your company on CATIA, NX or CREO, is the first thing that comes to mind.
The previewed Mac Pro won't have any issues with SolidWorks under Boot Camp, and most likely will run fine under Parallels. Even your large assemblies and simulations should work fine; better when OpenCL sees wider adoption, as it is trending.
Your problem is that there isn't a MBP with a Quadro or FireGL card. Yet plenty of people run SolidWorks fine as is on MBP without RealView.
I am aware of this, yes there is a controller but that is an implementation detail. Thunderbolt carries PCIe and DisplayPort.
Sacrifices yes. A laptop is not a desktop.It's not a mantra, it's was a honest question.
Ah, you are actually talking about laptops, got it. In that case you have already made sacrifices concerned with internal drive bays and PCIe expansion, not to mention the extra power you would have got from a desktop.
It's not- one controller multiplexes PCIe onto TB, the other one demultiplexes it- one signal is encoded in another - not a "mere" implementation detail.
Ethernet can carry IP, doesn't mean ethernet is IP!..
Lame example, try to use IP without ethernet or equivalent link layer.
Well, IP can carry ethernet, doesn't mean that IP is ethernet.
Stop being obtuse - the original point was that using ePCIe is much better than having TB for true expansion upgradability (especially that on the Host side since you're downgrading PCIe to GEN2 because PCIe GEN3 uses entirely different signally which TB v2 can't multiplex onto TB lanes btw!).
I can take PCIe, encode the signal into any form I like (even IP to transmit across the globe) then decode it on the other end, and just because my thing in the middle can carry PCIe signals doesn't make it PCIe.
Or perhaps it's an example of a user who sees the value of internal expansion, without the need for external, dust bunny-gathering houses.
Wrong, ethernet can carry IP.
What is the current ePCIe spec? All I found pointed to 250MB/s per lane, and nothing specific about it at PCI-SIG.
If we could afford CATIA, do you think we would have Solidworks licenses?
And no, 100,000 parts is not a big assembly. We are a small business with 16 designers. The product is neither large nor complex.
I have many problems with trying to convince design professionals that they do not need a Quadro card for FEA. The primary one is that work is near a river and I'm not a very good swimmer.
I have many problems with trying to convince design professionals that they..
There's no separate spec because it's a direct plug onto the bus...