Jobs clearly understands the evils of 'design-by-committee.'
earned through his team's creation of numerous iconic products and a plethora of design awards.
To me that man equals a god.![]()
Sorry but this is not correct.
The problem is, ergonomic designs, that are made to fit you hand, ideally in a comfortable relaxed state often don't look "Cool"
Matching the design of a device to the human form often means lumps and bumps and shapes that are superb to use, but we currently don't think they look very modern.
Not going to happen. It's well known that the other VP's only want to chat to Forstall in the presence of Cook. Cause of how Forstall is. Not really a team player.It's important that Ive and Forstall in particular work well together.
No. You want him to design unhindered by any other responsibilities.I'm sure it's already been posted here, but I really think they just should have made Ive the CEO.
Remember Steve Jobs' quote(It's actually Picasso's but he used it a lot)?
"Bad artists copy. Good artists steal."
And Steve called it stealing. That means he's jealous about Android. Steve seemed to be very selfish at times.
I actually find it ironic, I watched several youtube videos where Steve himself said that "Bad artists copy. Good artists steal." And now Android stole and he is angry? Well I guess besides being brilliant Steve is also a hypocrite.
Fanboi alert..
Remember Steve Jobs' quote(It's actually Picasso's but he used it a lot)?
"Bad artists copy. Good artists steal."
And Steve called it stealing. That means he's jealous about Android. Steve seemed to be very selfish at times.
Are you sure about that? Ive is a designer. He has little idea about computer hardware or software and he has full control over the final product. With this arrangement one should not be surprised when Apple comes up with things like glass phone - the first, the only and probably the last (I mean iPhone 4) glass phone in the World.
This is how all design should be. Products catered to please the people at the top are always watered down and never achieve the designers intended look. Give a designer ultimate freedom and you get art.
Which is why it's so interesting that Apple does it so differently -- the designer is in charge.
With most companies, you'd start with the hardware, then say "Ok, we need to package this up and make it look pretty".
With most companies, if you even have an in-house designer, the designs get filtered or nixed ("that's a really beautiful design, Joe, but get real, there's no way we can build something like that"). With Apple, they say "how can we make this happen?"
With most companies, they'd say "that design is beautiful but it would increase the cost by X. There's no way we could do that and stay competitive, so cut the cost." With Apple, they're free to say "you know what, so it costs more, we're betting the customers are willing to pay the extra." And so far, they've been right.
I don't think Ive is unique in his ability to come up with beautiful industrial designs. What's fairly unique is that he's been surrounded with a management team that can say "let's make this happen!"
Besides being annoying you are also very bad at logic. A very simple fallacy: "Good artists steal" doesn't imply "anyone who steals is a good artist". Most people who steal are just thieves.
That's another fallacy called the "ad hominem attack". When you can't counter the argument, you attack the messenger. And that name "baaadboy", is that supposed to sound like a sheep?
I agree. But don't say that on this board. Steve himself admitted to stealing other's designs, but got all bent when he thought Google did it. Gander? Goose?
I'm wondering.
Did Ives copy or steal from Dieter Rams?
Is he a great artist or merely a good artist?
I'm wondering.
Did Ives copy or steal from Dieter Rams?
Is he a great artist or merely a good artist?
Besides being annoying you are also very bad at logic. A very simple fallacy: "Good artists steal" doesn't imply "anyone who steals is a good artist". Most people who steal are just thieves.
That's another fallacy called the "ad hominem attack". When you can't counter the argument, you attack the messenger. And that name "baaadboy", is that supposed to sound like a sheep?
Steve said it himself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW0DUg63lqU
So by your own logic, Good artists are the one's who steal?
I don't even see what your argument is.
All you are doing is confirming my own argument.
Btw he didn't say "good artists steal" like you say in your post. He said "great artist steal" now who's bad at logic?
He's not confirming your argument. You just don't understand the quote.