Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This was very needed. Several small blogs have comments similar but coming from Steve the media might actually pay attention.

Not really sure how Adobe can strike back other than once again spouting off statistics. Adobe is interested in bottom line, Apple is interested in user experience. I'll take user experience. Being a web dev it SUCKS having to delay the use of technology because the major player isn't up to speed, Apple is committed to being up to speed, Adobe sets it's own (like IE).

Apple: 1, Adobe: 0

I'm guessing you're not a Flash dev?
 
I think many of you are missing a key part of his release.

"Adobe publicly said that Flash would ship on a smartphone in early 2009, then the second half of 2009, then the first half of 2010, and now they say the second half of 2010."

While flash "is coming" to a handful of smartphones its not working for most people who have a phone that allows flash to run. Virtually no body with a phone runs flash now. Perhaps one day Android phones will but that's still just rumor until Adobe gets its act together. So acting like Apple's so bad for not allowing Flash to run when in reality Flash doesn't run anywhere on phones.

Yes this isn't new info, but its the most relevant to me with a close 2nd being that most flash sites would have to be remade to work with a "mobile flash". If you don't want to redo your main site anyway, why not make a mobile version a bit less Flashy. We don't need as many slow loading, fancy animated sites that don't do anything great. If you have a true need for flash's capabilities then use it, but most sites don't and just use to to make basic animations.
 
It's all filler except for this:



That's really the only part that matters.

The iPhone is under Apple's control and Apple's goal is to make the iPhone better than other smart-phones. Letting Flash in would put the iPhone under Adobe's control and Adobe's goal is to make all smart-phones the same. That's what's good for Adobe.

It would be insane for Apple to hand over control to a company with such radically different goals.

You can certainly argue about everything else in the letter (both pro or con) but none of it really matters like this one point does.

It's a fair point!

But Apple could use the same logic to say: "Dump MS Office, and use iWork instead. When we update the OS, we'll update iWork at the same time. Microsoft can't do that. We don't want our business customers to be at the mercy of 3rd parties..."

Incidentally, as I understand it, each Flash-compiled iPhone app would require individual App Store approval, so Apple would still retain 100% control over the platform. Any Flash app which wasn't of sufficient quality could be rejected - it's not as if Apple has been slow to reject useless iPhone apps up to this point.
 
If Flash drains the battery and causes the iPhone to crash then I think it would be stupid to allow it on iPhone... just imagine you are in a emergency situation and your iPhone crashes or your battery dies much sooner than expected.

If you are going to sue someone it will be Apple and not Adobe. If you absolutely want Flash then go ahead and jailbreak your phone but do it at your own risk.

My iPhone battery drains fast now and Safari crashes all the time without Flash. Fix your own issues, Apple before you take shots at others. Morons.
 
With development, anything it possible.

Until someone gets off their but and makes some good tools for it, you aren't going to see HTML5 sites on the level of that JFK space program flash site.

ADOBE! WAKE UP! WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN DOING ALL THIS TIME?
 
Steve makes some fair points regarding performance of flash on mobile devices, but he refuses to admit the reality that HMTL5 is not an adequate substitute for Flash, and will not be for the foreseeable future. The HTML5 video standard is horrible, and even Leopard experiences better video performance using Flash rather than HTML5 (which cannot handle full screen HD videos on any platform). HTML5 brings some amazing technology to the table, but any honest developer who has experience with both technologies will tell you that HTML5 is just not up to par, and in many instances is more buggy and inconsistent than Flash.

In the end though, this type of pressure from Apple will either force Adobe to come up with some major optimizations for Flash or a new technology to replace it.
 
Did you read the piece you quoted when you wrote that below the quote?

Let me help: "While Apple also offers proprietary products, it believes that all web standards should be open"

iTunes video and Apple hardware and apps aren't web standards. Apple is saying that if something is going to become a standard, it shouldn't be locked down to only one company that controls it. And they're right. And it's not just Flash, either. Why do you think products like OpenOffice exist?


Yes. I read it. The point I was making was lead by example. How can Apple criticize someone for not being open when its not open itself. They can't pick and choose when it right or cool to be open.
 
When did they drop the DVD?

The Macbook Air and the iPad are their 2 "sexiest" portable devices.

I'm sure they sell less of them put together than Macbooks, but that's not the point. It's the "cool" devices that indicate where Apple's prodcuts are going in the future. They're like concept cars...the fact that there's only a few of them doesn't matter. They're what the future will look like.
 
I have a phone with Android 2.1. Where can I download Flash?

I can't. There are no happy users of Flash on Android, because there are NO USERS of Flash on Android yet. If Flash works beautifully when it comes out with Android 2.2, great. But there's zero evidence so far that it will, and a lot of reasons why Flash video and apps will likely be terrible on mobile platforms.
You will be able to soon...
 
Until someone gets off their but and makes some good tools for it, you aren't going to see HTML5 sites on the level of that JFK space program flash site.

ADOBE! WAKE UP! WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN DOING ALL THIS TIME?

hmm, how about making a canvas export tool for Flash CS5 perhaps? Apparently making apps export to the iPhone overshadowed this feature in CS5. Apple's been championing their canvas tag on the iPhone for over 3 years now; by the same token, where's Apple's tools? Not even a rudimentary export tool in Motion?
 
Good Letter

I'm glad Jobs wrote that letter. It was an excellent explanation of why Flash should not be on the iPOS and even not on the Mac. I've been running with Flash turned off 99% of the time, only enabling it when I really need it which is almost never. The web is a much more pleasant place without Flash. Browsing is faster. My computer runs faster. Memory usage is better. My DSL connection is less loaded. I see far fewer advertisements. Life without Flash is better.

On my iPod Touch there is no Flash yet every web site I use works great. On the iPad the web works great too. No need for Flash.

Flash is a resource hog and primarily used for advertising and useless glitz. Turn off Flash and really experience the full web.

As to the development issue, I totally agree having worked on 2ndary platforms before. Big bother. Apple provides a free developer environment. Its based on standards. Use it.
 
To the Flash devs out there trying to argue against the notion that people want Flash dead: I think Jobs said it best when Adobe should focus on making a top-notch HTML5 creative suite. I'm convinced anything (and yes, this means animations) that can be done with ActionScript and Flash can be done with HTML5/Javascript/CSS. The tools to create the stuff just aren't here yet, but when they do I imagine your tune will change quickly.

It's time to look at the bigger picture here.
 
The Macbook Air and the iPad are their 2 "sexiest" portable devices.

I'm sure they sell less of them put together than Macbooks, but that's not the point. It's the "cool" devices that indicate where Apple's prodcuts are going in the future. They're like concept cars...the fact that there's only a few of them doesn't matter. They're what the future will look like.
We're still at the concept car stage. I expect we're in the last round of optical media. I just don't see a mass replacement yet.
 
Steve makes some fair points regarding performance of flash on mobile devices, but he refuses to admit the reality that HMTL5 is not an adequate substitute for Flash, and will not be for the foreseeable future.

That's where apps come in.

HTML 5 is not replacing Flash on the iPhone/iPad.

HTML 5 and app-store apps are replacing Flash.
 
My iPhone battery drains fast now and Safari crashes all the time without Flash. Fix your own issues, Apple before you take shots at others. Morons.

All because of your own misuse.

You even misuse the word moron here.
 
Google Relationship

Did anyone else get the sense between the lines that the relationship between Apple and Google did not seem as strained as it is often portrayed in here? He brough up Google Chrome and Google (YouTube) several times in a very positive manner...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.