3.5 is perfect for a phone. If Steve thought 4 was good, that's great. I still rather have 3.5.
By that logic the iMac 27" should be one of the most fragile things on the planet.
In 2004, Sony shipped a laptop without built-in Ethernet or an ODD drive :
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=1970
Maybe Apple isn't so "ahead" as you think ?
Seriously folks, Apple isn't the sole industry innovator.
Best buy is selling the iphone 4 for 50 dollars now with a 2 year contract. The 3GS is 1 dollar on ATT. Paying the monthly 115 dollar bill is overpriced. Not the phone. But you can get it so you only pay 70 with certain options I think.
If they come up with a 4" screen, this will be the best selling IPHONE of all time. They lines are going to be longer with anticipation, unlike the 4S, where you did not have to line up to get one anywhere.
I agree. It's a good size -- the 4+ inch ones I keep seeing out there from other companies look almost comical in their hugeness, especially with so many of them having fairly low pixel density for such large screens. PPI aside, though, many of them seem to barely warrant the term 'portable'.
If its a a success ....."it was him"
If it's buggy and and it has problems ....."he had nothing to do with it and these type of problems wouldn't happen if he was still around"
Oh you people .....![]()
Steve was the guy who said, nobody wants a 4 inch phone.
not thrilled at a bigger screen. since it means shorter battery life
That isn't true....it all depends on the battery and the battery management. The droid maxx is super thin, and has a huge screen, and get's almost double battery life. (I'm only quoting android since those phones are the ones with the ridic huge screens).
I agree that his influence on the products will likely live on.
But how do you even start to back up such a claim? What's stopping Apple from releasing whatever product they want (heck, even an iCar?) and claiming that it was Steve's brainchild, both to appeal to fans and shut detractors up?![]()
Really? I don't think so, otherwise Apple would not have sold billions of devices when retina display was introduced.Hi, 3d app developer here, we don't care that much. Our scenes are far larger than the shown area and most are built to scale.
You don't think Steve Jobs changed the world with his foresight, innovations and skill to drive people to make cutting edge products? Have you seen how these products assist in the medical field, handicapped people, education, seniors, not to mention what it's done for the average consumer and business user. Yes, Steve jobs had an incredible positive influence, period.
The man has passed away, if you have nothing nice to say leave it alone.
Never said they didn't make a difference.... making a difference and changing the world are 2 completely different things. As far as kids with autism using the iPad... that's cool but my autistic son can use his iPad, my MIL's nook and my friends non apple tablet just fine.perhaps it's not penicillin or polio or whatever, but here's proof Apple's devices are making a difference
http://www.google.ca/search?q=kids+...s=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
It's not saying he's a 'God' per say, but to snuff off claims that the i-devices haven't made a huge difference for some people is baseless, to say the least.
Exactly. He also said something along the lines of "who the hell wants to watch video on something the size of an iPod? That's about the stupidest thing I've ever heard in my life, and you should be ashamed of ever mentioning something like that to me, Steve Jobs. Esquire. You're fired".
Then the iPod Touch came out. You could watch videos on it.
Here we go - something tells me this "Steve Job stamp of approval" is going to be coming out for a lot of future apple products well into the future.. Seems like this man continues to change the world even after he has passed on.
...But market change and it's good to see that apple now copies the positive things from Samsung etc.
Now learn a bit more from android and make the screen designs more flexible (why can't I have a nice big clock?) , have a file explorer (windows had that already 15 years ago) and make iTunes an option.
I hate that I cant transfer files between my iPad and iPhone.
I have stated a preference, I will of course judge at the time of unveiling, as we all will. But as I use my phone primarily as a phone, then as a web device, then foreverything else, I would prefer the next iPhone to keep the existing dimensions.
And nobody did, except for short Youtube clips. Seriously, I have never watched anything but Youtube clips on my iPhone 3G and 4. Once I got my iPad, then I started to watch movies on a 'small' screen.
I agree. It's a good size -- the 4+ inch ones I keep seeing out there from other companies look almost comical in their hugeness, especially with so many of them having fairly low pixel density for such large screens. PPI aside, though, many of them seem to barely warrant the term 'portable'.
Which also means... they would of known what the 5th gen (iPhone 4S) was going to looks like months before his passing... so Apple might have already had a prototype of what the 8th generation iPhone would look like...
(text missing about how mouse was the next big thing)... O boy, how wrong were they. Steve noticed in an instant that this was the future. He had a rare gift about predicting what was right and wrong
I'm sure many of the products coming out in the next year or two will be heavily influenced by Steve. I'm very curious to see exactly how Apple will implement a larger screen on the phone... hopefully we'll see this sooner than later...!
That hang on joke is over now,*it was awesome the 1st time, became good when an oldr phone was involved but by another person / let me try my hand at it...hang on 3g, hang on!
----------
then the leaked iphone button from last week would be wrong
I think this is counter to quite a bit of the real history behind Steve. He didn't have any unique abilities to see beauty or usability or anything. He wasn't only able to convince that he was right.
He made a lot of mistakes. He learned from them. He also wasn't afraid to change his vision or his mind when shown why it was wrong. Many things Apple did over the years weren't the fruit of Steve or even Steve's willingness. He balked at many projects that went on to be great successes for Apple.
He forced people to convince him at times. He was dragged kicking and screaming in quite a few instances.
What Steve was and probably still is the world's best salesman. No matter what he said in the past, no matter what he thought initially of the project, when he got up on that stage, he had you believe that this was right all along and this was now the way. And that is why people flocked to Apple. Steve had an aura for marketing his products.
There's a ton of good designers and engineers at Apple who understand usability, features and aesthetics, I'd argue even moreso than Steve. There's a reason they are at Apple and that Steve kept them around. If it had all been out of his mind, he would've worked alone.
It's sad to see that this will be perverted to satisfy some kind of "Steve" fetish amongst consumers, that now, everything great will have "Steve's last legacy" and everything that fails will be "those post-Steve guys".
That actually sounds morbid.
I can't say for certain but I'd assume Steve Jobs' family and personal life came before the Shareholders of Apple towards the end. If not, he had serious problems IMO. To make secret recordings from your deathbed in an effort to increase the corporate coffers... well, it sounds like that person would be "misguided" in attaching too much self importance to what they did in life - at least things that mattered anyway. We're talking electronic gizmos here people... not world peace or the quest for some elusive cancer cure.
Let the man rest and allow his family to move on beyond "Apple".
And yet it took Apple to do it for it to become the norm.
He has a point, but one thing that you and quite a few people understand is that there is no such thing as a one size fits all solution when it comes to computers and devices. File managers might be obtuse for mom and dad, but is it for me? No. I can fly through my directory structure and get to anything I need in a matter of seconds. But because mom and dad can't navigate through it nearly as quickly as I can, isn't instantly usable to the lowest common denominator, does that make it fundamentally flawed? Of course not. It's just not as easy. It requires a bit of practice and familiarity to use. And on the flipside of that, an iOS style siloed app solution does make using a computing device easier for mom and dad.
Not everyone uses their computers just to manage their media, and a siloed structure makes it more difficult to move files between applications. The best solution would take all usage scenarios into account, not just the ones that make it easiest for some people.