Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So this year, iphone was/will be the least important product
Mac pro, XDR display, now the new macbooks
I'm fine with that. They seemed to be slacking on the Mac a bit for awhile the past few years, so why not give it a shine?

The iPhone XI (or whatever) looks to be b-o-r-i-n-g anyway.
[doublepost=1563933733][/doublepost]
Their pricing is already so ridiculously high, it’s just madness.
I used to agree with that, but go back and look at some of the old keynotes where they're introducing MacBook Pro's Powerbooks and, especially, monitors. The prices in '99-'05 were just obscene.

You can say the technology should get cheaper and that's fair; however, it's not like exorbitant prices are new for Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smulji and jinnyman
Macbook 12 was nixed because Intel could not make new 5 W processor and MB 12 can't fit scissor keyboard, hence MB Air will get the upgraded keyboard. I really hope that Apple will bring it back though
 
Last edited:
Comet Lake in October would still be very optimistic.

I cannot disagree with you there...but is it really any more optimistic than Intel actually shipping 10nm in any sort of actual volume this year? Personally, I don’t see this 16” MBP shipping this year since the biggest two features (new keyboard and new CPU) aren’t supposed to ship until next year, including any sort of mobile Navi GPUs, given how slow AMD’s rollout has been...we’re almost to August and only the 5700/XT has been officially released. I think the intel is wrong, forgive the pun.
 
As I've said before, 3072x1920 gets a pass from me. A $3,000 laptop and Apple is too cheap to put in a true 4K display, which would be the Retina equivalent to the old 17" MacBook Pro from a decade ago. It's getting to be laughable at this point.

This is one of my biggest annoyances with these rumors. 3072x1920 is 16:10, but running at a 200% scale rate, it's really only the space of 1536x960. Never mind 1920x1080 (or 1920x1200), it's not even 1680x1050.

Back in the day, the 17' was always 1920×1200, and the 15' was available as 1680×1050.

Of course you can turn down the scale rate for more space, but then you are quickly losing quality.
 
Thinking about it, quite honestly.
Don’t even about it. Just do it.
You’ll be in and out of the store in 5 minutes, and you won’t feel like a sucker for years to come...
[doublepost=1563939033][/doublepost]
Was just about to purchase the refresh 2019 13 inch MacBook Pro, but after hearing this, I am going to wait. Icing on the cake would be.....

1. Faster CPU And GPU
2. Minimum of 256 SSD
3. Minimum of 16 Gb DDR-4
4. Thinner bezel
5. Better face time camera
6. Improve keyboard
7. Maybe even a 14 inch screen, but I would take a 13 anyway
8. USB-C
The minimum SSD being 128gb is still just so gobsmackingly idiotic, it’s just so insulting.
Minimum should be 512gb and for the price of the 128gb.
Apple are just SO unbelievably unfair about this.
 
It’s not hate, and “better” is subjective here. Have you tested the beta? It’s a mess. There will inevitably be problems remaining and problems will Be revealed at launch. I’ve seen this all before.

Plus, I rarely need, but occasionally do access and run a 32-bit applications, and Catalina can’t do that. I deploy and maintain devices as well as work as a project manager in a structural demolition and abatement company. Catalina offers us nothing as we need some legacy support for our customers. We don’t care about breaking up iTunes and Sidecar. Luna and Duet exceed what Sidecar does.
"There will inevitably be problems remaining and problems will Be revealed at launch. I’ve seen this all before."

That tends to happen when there are a lot of under-the-hood architectural & API changes,
 
  • Like
Reactions: BarredOwl
As I've said before, 3072x1920 gets a pass from me. A $3,000 laptop and Apple is too cheap to put in a true 4K display, which would be the Retina equivalent to the old 17" MacBook Pro from a decade ago. It's getting to be laughable at this point.

I suspect this is actually a lower tier "pro"...with the performance similar to a MBP, but cheaper screen tech and cheaper keyboard...a pro for people who complain apple products are too expensive.

I kinda think Apple will keep the 15" as the premium model, with the IPS display...and touch bar + butterfly keyboard.

But maybe the 16" will be scissor keys, no touch bar, and use a cheaper display technology....sort of a bare bones version.

Y'all will love it when you hear the butterfly is the "premium" keyboard...and Apple keeps it for the next 10 years. :)

(If given the option to buy a mbp with cheaper display, i dont know if i would buy it. The display is a defining feature, and i hate bad/cheap displays. I am price conscious, but still...it would take some of the shine off....)
 
they should release this with the new scissor keyboard, or it will let down some people.

My money is ready to be given to them, but not until an entirely new keyboard design is introduced.

Indeed. I do want to refresh my 2016 but except for the keyboard, it's working fine. I don't think I want to replace it with the same unreliable keyboard.

I love my 2016 15", but I don't love the fact that I always need to have canned air at home and in the office. That keyboard is so incredibly finnicky. I really think that on a fundamental level, the mechanism cannot cope with normal everyday dust and dirt.

One word : MagSafe 3
need that magsafe!!!

There are 3rd party solutions for this. Have you tried them?

I am semi-retired, when I walk into a client, this little laptop can join any topology.

This frankly is my dream. How many days per week do you work? Do you still require this income, or is it more of a nice bonus? Did you luck out with one particular investment, or save hard? Please don't reply if these questions are rude/overly intrusive, I just love stories like this.
 
A shame because MacBook Pros used to offer both portability and power. That was kind of the point of them. Now Tim just considers it a label to differentiate prices.

The 15" Pros are pretty powerful. There is a huge delta in performance compared to the Air. The MBPs are great for bursty workloads, but the CPU can also sustain reasonable clock levels indefinitely as long as you're not heavily using AVX instructions nor heavily taxing the GPU at the same time.
 
Because there is no point in having 4K on such a small display, with the working distance between your eyes and the display?

4K on a laptop is just extremely taxing on the GPU and battery. Apple has found a good middle ground to offer better performance (battery and GPU performance).
This is simply not true.

We uses to have the 17" MBP with 1920x1200 resolution...
The current 15" can scale this as a retina resolution albeit a non-linear one that degrades quality.
A resolution of 1920x1200 POINTS is perfectly usable at 15"+.

The problem is... non-linear scaling which degrades quality. Heck....when I need the workspace I run my MBP at native @1x scaling (altho I'd not recommend this as UI Elements are really small then).

So in order to have 1920x1200 Points and native @2x / 200% retina scaling... we simply NEED 4K.

Its essentially the exact opposite to a useless gimmick on a MBP. It borders a necessity.
 
I think that it’s likely that Apple will introduce a completely redesigned MacBook Pro line-up where the current 13” and 15” models are replaced by 14” and 16” models. A complete redesign could be required for e.g. a different keyboard-approach (and perhaps discrete graphic cards for all models), which could require the machines to be slightly thicker than their current counterparts.

Given the problems with the current butterfly-mechanism keyboards, I find it unlikely that Apple will introduce a new model which employs a new keyboard-technology and keep the current models as cheaper alternatives. Better to update the whole line-up, fixing the known problems while introducing (even) better and bigger displays and other features.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dylin
No, Hell no and absolutely ****ing not...if I wanted to buy some fat-assed 2” thick ASUS ROG, MSI, Gigabyte janky-ass looking POS, I would have already done it.

The current chassis does just fine with the 8-core 9th Gen CPUs and anything thicker than the old 2012-2015 MacBook Pros is just too thick. Go lug around an old Late 2011 MacBook Pro all day long and tell me with a straight face you really want Apple to do that again.
While I also object to the radiator design, I believe that Apple doesn't need to just build ultrabooks.

If they released updated versions on the 2011s I'd jump in in a heartbeat.

I always believed they could sell them ALONG their other offerings. Everyone wins.

So ultrabooks would be MB, MBA.

Regular would be the current or at least Retina MBPs.

And desktop replacements would be like the 15 and 17 inches like the 2011s. These wouldn't have to be so portable, just transportable. And these would be the ones with all the ports, MagSafe, upgradeable drives, batteries, and RAM, and the classic, excellent, and reliable keyboards.

Just fire up those old foundries and molds!!
 
I know it'll never happen, but I so very much want the 16" model to have a numeric pad (instead of just a tiny keyboard with massive wasted space to the left and right).

The problem with that layout is that the keyboard is then offset against the display, which is probably why Apple doesn't go down that route. You can add a USB numeric pad if you really think you'll get the use out of it. I used to when I had to crunch spreadsheets for a living.
 
I think that it’s likely that Apple will introduce a completely redesigned MacBook Pro line-up where the current 13” and 15” models are replaced by 14” and 16” models. A complete redesign could be required for e.g. a different keyboard-approach (and perhaps discrete graphic cards for all models), which could require the machines to be slightly thicker than their current counterparts.

Given the problems with the current butterfly-mechanism keyboards, I find it unlikely that Apple will introduce a new model which employs a new keyboard-technology and keep the current models as cheaper alternatives. Better to update the whole line-up, fixing the known problems while introducing (even) better and bigger displays and other features.

I agree.
I do feel, that it will make its transition to the14 and 16 inch models next year. Since we just had a refresh on both the 13 and 15 this year already, I don't think apple is in a rush to get any new Macs out by the end of the year. the only one they will be releasing, is just the Mac Pro since they officinally announced it. Oh and the display. 2020 seems to be a reasonable release time for a new MacBook Pro with new design.

I also think that they are going with the 4 year long design for their laptops. 2008 introduced the unibody, 2012 they started the retina, and then 2016 they did the touch bar. So 2020 seems to fall in line with that idea.
 
I agree.
I do feel, that it will make its transition to the14 and 16 inch models next year. Since we just had a refresh on both the 13 and 15 this year already, I don't think apple is in a rush to get any new Macs out by the end of the year. the only one they will be releasing, is just the Mac Pro since they officinally announced it. Oh and the display. 2020 seems to be a reasonable release time for a new MacBook Pro with new design.

I also think that they are going with the 4 year long design for their laptops. 2008 introduced the unibody, 2012 they started the retina, and then 2016 they did the touch bar. So 2020 seems to fall in line with that idea.

I guess it doesn't matter what makes sense and what does not. There's too much information pointing at the release of several macbooks this year, the strongest evidence being the newly registered serial numbers. What these macbooks will effectively turn out to be will remain to be seen, a 16" seems very likely by now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ener Ji
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.