IMO don't call it "Pro" if it can't continuously operate at full load under normal office conditions.
You can. What you can’t do is get a continuous turbo boost.
IMO don't call it "Pro" if it can't continuously operate at full load under normal office conditions.
I'm fine with that. They seemed to be slacking on the Mac a bit for awhile the past few years, so why not give it a shine?So this year, iphone was/will be the least important product
Mac pro, XDR display, now the new macbooks
I used to agree with that, but go back and look at some of the old keynotes where they're introducing MacBook Pro's Powerbooks and, especially, monitors. The prices in '99-'05 were just obscene.Their pricing is already so ridiculously high, it’s just madness.
Really? That's interesting. I bet it gets reincarnated as the ARM MacBook.Macbook 12 was nixed because Intel could not make new 5 W processor and MB 12 can't fit scissor keyboard, hence MB Air get the upgraded keyboard
Comet Lake in October would still be very optimistic.
As I've said before, 3072x1920 gets a pass from me. A $3,000 laptop and Apple is too cheap to put in a true 4K display, which would be the Retina equivalent to the old 17" MacBook Pro from a decade ago. It's getting to be laughable at this point.
Just return it.Damnit Bobby, I just got a new Air four days ago.
Don’t even about it. Just do it.Thinking about it, quite honestly.
The minimum SSD being 128gb is still just so gobsmackingly idiotic, it’s just so insulting.Was just about to purchase the refresh 2019 13 inch MacBook Pro, but after hearing this, I am going to wait. Icing on the cake would be.....
1. Faster CPU And GPU
2. Minimum of 256 SSD
3. Minimum of 16 Gb DDR-4
4. Thinner bezel
5. Better face time camera
6. Improve keyboard
7. Maybe even a 14 inch screen, but I would take a 13 anyway
8. USB-C
"There will inevitably be problems remaining and problems will Be revealed at launch. I’ve seen this all before."It’s not hate, and “better” is subjective here. Have you tested the beta? It’s a mess. There will inevitably be problems remaining and problems will Be revealed at launch. I’ve seen this all before.
Plus, I rarely need, but occasionally do access and run a 32-bit applications, and Catalina can’t do that. I deploy and maintain devices as well as work as a project manager in a structural demolition and abatement company. Catalina offers us nothing as we need some legacy support for our customers. We don’t care about breaking up iTunes and Sidecar. Luna and Duet exceed what Sidecar does.
As I've said before, 3072x1920 gets a pass from me. A $3,000 laptop and Apple is too cheap to put in a true 4K display, which would be the Retina equivalent to the old 17" MacBook Pro from a decade ago. It's getting to be laughable at this point.
they should release this with the new scissor keyboard, or it will let down some people.
My money is ready to be given to them, but not until an entirely new keyboard design is introduced.
One word : MagSafe 3
need that magsafe!!!
I am semi-retired, when I walk into a client, this little laptop can join any topology.
A shame because MacBook Pros used to offer both portability and power. That was kind of the point of them. Now Tim just considers it a label to differentiate prices.
This is simply not true.Because there is no point in having 4K on such a small display, with the working distance between your eyes and the display?
4K on a laptop is just extremely taxing on the GPU and battery. Apple has found a good middle ground to offer better performance (battery and GPU performance).
While I also object to the radiator design, I believe that Apple doesn't need to just build ultrabooks.No, Hell no and absolutely ****ing not...if I wanted to buy some fat-assed 2” thick ASUS ROG, MSI, Gigabyte janky-ass looking POS, I would have already done it.
The current chassis does just fine with the 8-core 9th Gen CPUs and anything thicker than the old 2012-2015 MacBook Pros is just too thick. Go lug around an old Late 2011 MacBook Pro all day long and tell me with a straight face you really want Apple to do that again.
like mainstream news or in tech blogs not anecdotal experiencesYou’re kidding right?
Can we ask your wife or gf ?An extra inch can make a big difference.![]()
I know it'll never happen, but I so very much want the 16" model to have a numeric pad (instead of just a tiny keyboard with massive wasted space to the left and right).
cheaper screen tech
I think that it’s likely that Apple will introduce a completely redesigned MacBook Pro line-up where the current 13” and 15” models are replaced by 14” and 16” models. A complete redesign could be required for e.g. a different keyboard-approach (and perhaps discrete graphic cards for all models), which could require the machines to be slightly thicker than their current counterparts.
Given the problems with the current butterfly-mechanism keyboards, I find it unlikely that Apple will introduce a new model which employs a new keyboard-technology and keep the current models as cheaper alternatives. Better to update the whole line-up, fixing the known problems while introducing (even) better and bigger displays and other features.
I agree.
I do feel, that it will make its transition to the14 and 16 inch models next year. Since we just had a refresh on both the 13 and 15 this year already, I don't think apple is in a rush to get any new Macs out by the end of the year. the only one they will be releasing, is just the Mac Pro since they officinally announced it. Oh and the display. 2020 seems to be a reasonable release time for a new MacBook Pro with new design.
I also think that they are going with the 4 year long design for their laptops. 2008 introduced the unibody, 2012 they started the retina, and then 2016 they did the touch bar. So 2020 seems to fall in line with that idea.
You can. What you can’t do is get a continuous turbo boost.