The iPhone X screen is also narrower so it is in fact smaller than the Plus.
I always liked the message integration among Apple products, but with the availability of encrypted applications like Signal Private Messenger I can get pretty good integration between PCs, Android phones, and the Apple products I continue to buy (iMacs and iPads as of the last two years). The removal of the phone jack the last straw for my future purchasing of iPhones. My main objection - other than accompanying price - to infrared authentication is that I'm not totally convinced longtime use won't be damaging to the eyes. Only time will tell for that.I have a iPhone 6s +. Other than battery life, it's just as great as when I first got it. However, I've played a fair amount in store with an X. I like the slimmer bezels, and the hand feel way more. Will I upgrade to a new phone in the next year? Yes. I'll be picking up whatever the x 2 is, and upgrading the battery on my iPhone 6s + to be my new music only player. Do I think that I would need to upgrade, versus just replacing the battery and going another year with my three year old phone? No, I do not. If I was being super thrifty, I'd honestly either just get the next SE, or a smaller 7. Phones have truly matured, and I don't think having the latest and greatest is as "cool" as it was a couple of years ago. Honestly, if it wasn't for iMessage, I'd probably wait six months and just grab a Galaxy s9.
Then you shift over to a non-Apple phone with touch id; of course, a lot of folks did that with the loss of the phone jack. I'll run my 6S+ until it dies, and meanwhile invest in newer Android phones with the features I want. Apple has basically decided to shun folks who don't want wireless headphones or dongle adapters for wired, and are in the process of making all iThing users go to infrared authentication. I'm guessing that the iPad Pro I bought four months ago will be my last iPad, as the next generation is going infrared. You can dismiss me as an Apple hater, but that isn't exactly true. I just took delivery of a new iMac today, as it has the features I want, and though rather expensive, is still a durable worthwhile desktop with useful ports and a headphone jack. Can't say the same for the Apple laptops of the last few years, so I no longer buy MacBook whatevers. Apple apparently decided that diehard Apple enthusiasts will make up for the loss of customers like me. Perhaps they will. The company has mostly migrated from being a high end general computer company to a producer of high dollar, thin, non-upgradeable, rather portless mobile devices, and that's appealing to most their current customer base.
That's because sales didn't meet expectations regardless of what Tim Cook says! He's said a lot of things that turned out to be totally untrue. He doesn't wow people like Steve Jobs. People find out much sooner!
Pretty much, just like with the Apple Watch, now it’s selling lots yes and is a fantastic little device, I have one, but the fact Apple buried any notion of its sales figures in with a load of other Apple devices speaks volumes I think and it has under performed for Apples sales figures. It can sell millions and millions and still fall far short of how many Apple proclaimed to the market it would sell, but you’ll never know..
The size of the population is not relevant. It's just the size of the sample, which appears to be fine - providing the sample was chosen appropriately with corrections for differences between the sample and overall population if necessary.not really. for 50mil population with confidence level of 95% and confidence interval of 2.5 the sample size comes to be about 1500. This makes a decent survey i guess. I have used basic sample size calculator online.
I dont agree with your complaint list, but by using the price as an estimate for the length of a warranty an s-class amg should be bumper to bumper for 10 years.Camera Bump, Slow Camera Lens, Small Camera Sensor, Poor Battery Life, Not Waterproof, Stale Form Factor, Finish Does Not Hold Up, Limited Colors, Over Emojied IOS, No Sapphire Front, Poor Cellular Antenna, Poor Cellular Modem. How's that for a complaint list. For a $1000+ dollar phone it should be warrantied for five years period.
A good sample size would have been 44100 people. A much better sample size would have been 48000 people.A survey of 1,500 people is a joke, and not what I consider a good sampling.
No Problem, The Warranty does need a serious upgrade considering the price for a new phone.I dont agree with your complaint list, but by using the price as an estimate for the length of a warranty an s-class amg should be bumper to bumper for 10 years.
Material Design, the basis for Android design, came out in 2014. I don’t suppose you’re getting tired of that, right?
Material design is due for a change too. Rumors are Android P can revise it.
"I haven't upgraded because I prefer a smaller form factor" notably absent...
Then you shift over to a non-Apple phone with touch id; of course, a lot of folks did that with the loss of the phone jack. I'll run my 6S+ until it dies, and meanwhile invest in newer Android phones with the features I want. Apple has basically decided to shun folks who don't want wireless headphones or dongle adapters for wired, and are in the process of making all iThing users go to infrared authentication. I'm guessing that the iPad Pro I bought four months ago will be my last iPad, as the next generation is going infrared. You can dismiss me as an Apple hater, but that isn't exactly true. I just took delivery of a new iMac today, as it has the features I want, and though rather expensive, is still a durable worthwhile desktop with useful ports and a headphone jack. Can't say the same for the Apple laptops of the last few years, so I no longer buy MacBook whatevers. Apple apparently decided that diehard Apple enthusiasts will make up for the loss of customers like me. Perhaps they will. The company has mostly migrated from being a high end general computer company to a producer of high dollar, thin, non-upgradeable, rather portless mobile devices, and that's appealing to most their current customer base.
Ok, that had absolutely nothing to do with the subject at hand and whether the survey in question is accurate but I'm glad you got it out of your system.While true, it is also true that statistics are misused routinely in an effort to mislead the public. In order to know if this was enough you would need to know a lot more about how the survey was constructed than published in MR.
Repeating studies like this without checking their accuracy is exactly how bad statistics (not judging this article, because I have not researched it) make their round, nobody pays attention to the base study, they just mechanically reproduce what was in the press release.
Anyone interested, and everyone should be, should read the 142 page book, small format, titled, "How to Lie with Statistics", by Darrell Huff, published 1954. It is freely available on the web, and is also on Amazon.
Also check out the article "Trouble at the lab", published by The Economist.
Anyone that does a little research will find a number of professors at well respected universities that believe between 50 and 80% of medical studies conducted by Ph.D.'s utilize flawed statistics to prove what the study's financiers favored.
More than likely if you are taking a modern medical drugs its efficacy is based on flawed statistics. Now I am not saying medical drugs are bad, I'm just saying, and there is research out their that confirms, that we are, in a significant number of cases, being fed a bunch of lies about cause, effect, efficacy and side effects.
This day and age, it would not be unreasonable to ignore any statistics published by the general media.
A good sample size would have been 44100 people. A much better sample size would have been 48000 people.
Please. My car is a '99 Plymouth Neon. I still have it because it still works fine. People make purchases based on perceived need and financial resources. Many people like buying a new car every couple of years. I think that's silly and wasteful. But I basically do the same thing with phones, although I used to do every other model. There's no pain for me to get the latest phone because iPhones have such a great trade-in value and now that I'm on Apple's plan, I never actually pay full price so it is especially easy and actually the smart thing to do.This is exactly what popped into my cynical mind. If Apple sees the reason for waning upgrades is "my current phone is fine" that puts a high incentive on making those devices "not fine"
Agree with all of that. When I use Touch ID on my 6 is feels so archaic compared to FaceID. And I like that that mechanical piece vulnerable to liquids, finger goo and wear is GONE.Funny how everyone who says that Face ID sucks or that it isn’t good enough yet are people who don’t even own a X and haven’t even tried it in regular, daily use. It’s all skeptics. I have a X and I think it’s great, and everyone else who actually owns a X likes it as well. Nobody who owns a X complains about the notch either. Just those who see a picture of it and decide that they don’t like it because of what they see. The only complaint I hear from people who actually own a X is from those who went from a Plus model complaining about less screen area. And whether you like it or not, I think Apple has made it pretty clear that they’re ditching Touch ID.
[doublepost=1520312656][/doublepost]
I especially agree with the gesture controls being way quicker than a home button. Especially when it comes to switching apps. Just one flick of the finger and you’re in a different app. You can run circles around someone who’s using the home button trying to do all of that. Using a home button really does feel so much more slow and clunky after getting use to all the quick gestures on the X.
It’s not the same damn thing. I don’t understand this argument at all. A notch is a part of the screen that cuts into content and is unevenely shaped. A bezel is just a bezel, isn’t a a part of the screen and does not cut into content. Why are you assuming that’s the same thing? How is it? It doesn’t make any sense at all.
This applies to all smartphones, not just the X. Smartphones are just not worth that much money. They're commodity items now. I don't really see a reason why we should be paying more than say $300 or $400 for a smartphone... doesn't matter if it's running iOS or Android, doesn't matter what fancy gimmicks they include, doesn't matter what the screen size is, etc.
.....which is too large for those wanting a compact iPhone.It's almost the exact same size as the iPhone 7.