The costs of the iPhone now equals a three year cycle for my needs. Nothing against any of the Apple iPhones features, three years works.
"44% - My iPhone works fine".
Apple: It'd be a shame if your "old" and "degrading" but under warranty battery justified a hidden throttle to 40%. Oh and this new emoji means skipping tracks in Music takes 5 seconds longer.
Vertically yes. Horizontally no.These people know the X screen is larger than a plus screen yeah?
Narrower in the width. Diagonally it is bigger but not area wise.
TouchID is not coming back. You need to let that go.
A survey of 1,500 people is a joke, and not what I consider a good sampling.
A sample size of 1,500 is more than sufficient.
It is absolutely a large enough sample.
Some people either need to take stats, or should have paid attention when it was taught to them.
I used to perform consumer testing at Procter & Gamble. You would be surprised to know how few people you need to have a statistically-representative sample, especially when you don’t intend to do specific breakouts
I've answered it 4 times.. Now you are just playing games. To the ignore list as you don't really have anything of value to add to a conversation.
The biggest reason is people are too lazy to upgrade. Even though iPhone X truly is a revolutionary device packed full of compelling features, gorgeous design, improved security, and the iPhone of the future, some people will never appreciate they are missing out on incredible new technologies.
If you read these forums you'd think 98% would have stated 'dat notch tho' as the reason they didn't upgrade..
Meh, why not ask 1500 iPhone 6s or 7 users why they didn't upgrade to the 8.. Same ole' same ole' garbage type polls..
The X is stellar and those who didn't upgrade to it are missing out!
I’ve done okay on the S8+ and will soon be getting the S9+ when I trade in my S7 Edge. I think it’s possible to have an OLED display that doesn’t bother people’s eyes or trigger migraines, and since Apple has been made aware that this happens, we can hope they will do what it takes to adjust the next batch. I think you’re wise to wait. I found that display difficult to bear after awhile. I’m going to hold onto my 8 Plus as long as it lasts because I like it very much. I liked my 7 Plus, too, and would have kept it but once it was out of warranty and showing signs of battery trouble I decided trading it in would be a good move. And I did want the option of wireless charging.I’m not sold on oled just yet. I decided to wait for the second iPhone X iteration to see if people are still reporting headaches and eye strain.
why to you is the X such a worthwhile upgrade?.
Admittedly I do not own a X yet, but my fingers are frequently damp enough or in gloves to where touch ID fails. I look forward to face ID.I didn’t find that to be the case, not when sleeping on my side or using it at such angles. Typing my passcode in or having to lift my head up for it to scan my face was a frustratingly common occurrence, whereas TouchID is just a touch away with none of the above issues.
As to my comment about sample size in and of itself, I will take my forum lumps and admit I was wrong, even though we don't know it was properly constructed. My comment also included my thoughts on how poorly the questions were constructed, even though I failed to state such in a clear manner. That was largely where my "is a joke" part of my comment came from.Hey Basic "Great" Guy: read those two posts that I quoted. They're right, and you're dead wrong. Actually, a great deal of polling is done with much less than 1500 people. And here's why:
Indeed! Here's a neat trick for the didn't-major-in-stats people out there. Assuming your sample is properly constructed*, a crude but reasonable approximation for the margin of error is: 1/square root(N). So here's what that approximation yields for a variety of sample sizes:
Notice how quickly you hit diminishing returns. This is why very often in polling, you'll see sample sizes of 600-1000. Now, if you want to think about how accurate your estimates are for particular sub-groups--say, men under 30--then that is an argument for sampling more people. But overall? 1500 is much more than sufficient.
- 100 10.00%
- 200 7.07%
- 300 5.77%
- 400 5.00%
- 600 4.08%
- 800 3.54%
- 1,000 3.16%
- 1,200 2.89%
- 1,500 2.58%
- 2,000 2.24%
- 3,000 1.83%
- 5,000 1.41%
- 10,000 1.00%
- 20,000 0.71%
- 50,000 0.45%
ALL THAT SAID: from what little we know, this research isn't particularly good for a couple reasons:
I can think of better ways to do what Olson wants and purports to do. As described, this question is kind of useless--but not at all because of sample size.
- It makes a common market research mistake of confusing stated beliefs with behavior. Asking people why they did what they did or did not do something can work in the right circumstances, but it can also be badly off base. There are better ways to approximate behavioral decisions. For anyone who's actually read what I've typed, one example worth Googling is conjoint analysis.
- The question—which I Googled to be "You currently own an iPhone yet you didn't upgrade to (what Apple believes is) the best Apple phone yet, the iPhone X. Why?"—is phrased poorly. That happens a lot unfortunately. It gives only 3 options and an "other" option. Given an explicit option and an "other" option, people tend to pick an explicit option unless they feel strongly about an "other" option. Moreover, this phrasing ignores the possibility that there may be multiple considerations at work, each with different levels of importance. [Of note: I haven't been able to find the original research note email. It's possible the question was open-ended and the response options you see are the coding from that open-ended response, which would be better...but doesn't fix the key problem in point #1).
* "properly constructed" = representative of the underlying population. Easier said than done. Could write a separate even longer post on this one, but I don't want to go on that tangent unless someone wants us to take it there.
I upgrade my phone every year. There has always been some increment in performance or change in function that has allowed me to justify this to myself, and last year was no exception. I bought an iPhone X. Overall, I have been disappointed. Don't get me wrong, the new interface is really great, and definitely the way to go forwards with iPhones and probably iPads in the future. Also my computer, probably my car and motorbike, etc etc. But, after coming to realise that the larger screen of the iPhone 6 Plus could be advantageous, I have been completely sold on the new larger format. The iPhone X represented a loss in screen real estate that I continue to begrudge. And overall, I feel let down and disappointed by a return to a smaller format (albeit in a taller screen, which simply does not compensate for the loss of width) I can't wait for a new iPhone X Plus to come out with say a 6.5" screen. Roll on September!
Just curious: what iPhone apps are you using that currently suffer from inadequate RAM?I think that’s more to do with the Face ID sensors. I’m waiting to see if the X 2nd gen is any improvement. I’m hoping with iOS 12 they are more smart with how they handle the notch, because right now it’s amateur-level sloppy. 4GB of RAM and improved Face ID might have me considering upgrading though.
I agree. But it also can lead to buyers remorse because looks ain't everything.You've responded to it 4 times, you have yet to answer it.
[doublepost=1520304341][/doublepost]
Without saying one way or the other whether it's modern looking this is a perfectly valid reason to buy the iPhone X if that's your criteria.
Eye bought the EyeFone10 and feel like the bottom barrel duchbag that I am"I haven't upgraded because I prefer a smaller form factor" notably absent...
Yeah, too big.It's almost the exact same size as the iPhone 7.
DUH!
iPhone users who haven't upgraded to the iPhone X were recently queried on why they've held out on purchasing a new phone, with the majority citing reasons like high price and a lack of compelling features.
A survey conducted by Piper Jaffray analyst Michael Olson and shared by Philip Elmer-DeWitt this morning asked 1,500 people who own an iPhone but didn't upgrade to the iPhone X to explain their reasoning.
![]()
44 percent of respondents said they hadn't upgraded because their iPhone works fine, suggesting there were no standout features compelling them to purchase a new device, while 31 percent said the iPhone X was too expensive at a starting price of $999.
Eight percent of respondents said the iPhone X's screen isn't large enough, while 17 percent had another reason entirely.
Piper Jaffray believes the iPhones coming in 2018 will address most of these issues, with Apple rumored to be planning to introduce three devices. One will be a followup to the iPhone X with a 5.8-inch OLED display, a second will have a larger 6.5-inch OLED display, and a third will feature a 6.1-inch LCD display with a lower price tag.
All upcoming 2018 iPhones are rumored to feature an edge-to-edge display with no bezels and a TrueDepth camera system for Face ID, along with other improvements like a faster A12 processor.
Piper Jaffray believes Apple will sell 233.8M iPhones in fiscal 2019, with the 2018 iPhones set to drive ongoing upgrades well into next year.
Article Link: Survey Explores Why iPhone Owners Haven't Upgraded to iPhone X
The biggest reason is people are too lazy to upgrade. Even though iPhone X truly is a revolutionary device packed full of compelling features, gorgeous design, improved security, and the iPhone of the future, some people will never appreciate they are missing out on incredible new technologies.