Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
True, although they did get 42 shots on goal. Our next game is on Thursday vs Chicago. They have 9 straight losses. They are due for a win, and we are due for a loss, having won 4 straight. I hope the Rangers pull it off. I also have a feeling Biron will be starting, giving Hank some rest.

I saw the highlights, and it seemed like there were a bunch of sloppy plays by the B's. Someone I know was at the game, and he said they seemed effortless.

Ah yes, and it was Lundqvist's 42nd career shutout. The answer to life the universe and everything.:p
 
True, the Rangers did a great job on D not allowing many quality shots against. Lmao about the 42 shutouts. I saw most of the game, but it was on my iPhone via my SlingBox. I was working. AT&T better not throttle me (again)!!!
 
The Blackhawks have just plain sucked lately. I can't believe how they've fallen apart. It has to be a mental thing on the part of the team as whole.

I will say this though, Ray Emery scared the crap out of me in the pre-season. But damn, if he has not stepped up. I have been so impressed with him lately. He worked his butt off this whole season and should be proud. Now, if the rest of the team would just do the same...

Oh, and the Sens tonight? Hell, yes! :)

True, the Rangers did a great job on D not allowing many quality shots against. Lmao about the 42 shutouts. I saw most of the game, but it was on my iPhone via my SlingBox. I was working. AT&T better not throttle me (again)!!!

Maybe Thomas will stop flapping his gums now. NY did a great job.
 
How about those Red Wings and their record-breaking 21st* straight home win in a row? Amazing, considering they had such a rocky start to the season. I knew they'd pull it together.

* 3 of their home wins were shootout wins. The 1929-30 Boston Bruins and the 1975-76 Philadelphia Flyers, who both hold the record for 20 straight home wins, didn't have the shootout, so if their games went to overtime and no one scored during OT, they would have ended in a tie. Those records are more "pure" IMO.

It wasn't Boston rocky, but not the best. Let's hope the Wings make it 23+ to stuff all the purists up. The game is a completely different game today -- it's not even apples and oranges. Can't really compare the three.

The Blackhawks have just plain sucked lately. I can't believe how they've fallen apart. It has to be a mental thing on the part of the team as whole.

It's looking pretty bad in Chicago. They only have a 3-5 point cushion on teams #9-11 in the West and they're in the toughest division in the NHL. I really doubt they would fall that far, but you never know.
 
I saw the highlights, and it seemed like there were a bunch of sloppy plays by the B's. Someone I know was at the game, and he said they seemed effortless.

Ah yes, and it was Lundqvist's 42nd career shutout. The answer to life the universe and everything.:p

Effortless is an understatement. The All Star Game was effortless. This was the Rangers making the Bruins look like a bunch of rookie chumps. The Rangers out hustled, out worked, and out played the Bruins. The only thing that they didn't do is out shoot them. The Rangers deserve to be in first based on that performance.

The 4th line is +1, +5, and +6 respectively for the season. The +1 is Thornton and the other two guys play on the PK and some on the PP. Krejci, the supposed #1 center, is attempting to do his best Phil Kessel 2010-2011 impression with a -5 -- a minus ****ing 5. Maybe he's just dogging it because he's only making $4M this year and the big money doesn't start until next season ($5.25M).

It was so bad that I actually left the game early. I don't leave many games early.

And the Rangers keep on rolling. Lundqvist is simply amazing.

True, the Rangers did a great job on D not allowing many quality shots against. Lmao about the 42 shutouts.

Hank was great -- no two ways about it. And, perhaps the Rangers D was "great" not allowing quality shots but 42 shots is a lot on any goalie. The B's just seemed to slap it towards the net any time they could and quick message to the boys -- IF YOU DON'T HAVE SOMEONE IN FRONT OF THE DAMN GOAL YOU ARE NOT GOING TO GET THE REBOUND. IF YOU ARE TRYING TO SCORE FROM THE POINT, STOP DOING THAT.

Hopefully the 12 day road trip will get things back on track starting with the Habs tonight. Also, please keep Timmy off of Facebook and his soapbox. Stop the damn puck.

Ok, I'm done.
 
True, although they did get 42 shots on goal. Our next game is on Thursday vs Chicago. They have 9 straight losses. They are due for a win, and we are due for a loss, having won 4 straight. I hope the Rangers pull it off. I also have a feeling Biron will be starting, giving Hank some rest.

Lundqvist was great as usual. Bruins have been in a funk pretty much since the Vancouver game (minus a couple of games). Meanwhile the Rangers have been on a tear like the Bruins were on in November.

Bruins need to do something to turn it around. Without Horton there is a gaping hole in the lineup. Caron and Pouliot have both looked like dog ****.

I saw the highlights, and it seemed like there were a bunch of sloppy plays by the B's. Someone I know was at the game, and he said they seemed effortless.

They played quite well for the first 10 minutes. Then Chara was an idiot and went to the box on that stupid closing the hand on the puck penalty, and they fell apart from there. Rangers scored on that PP and the Bruins were playing catch up, and Lundqvist didn't let anything go by.

True, the Rangers did a great job on D not allowing many quality shots against. Lmao about the 42 shutouts. I saw most of the game, but it was on my iPhone via my SlingBox. I was working. AT&T better not throttle me (again)!!!

Maybe Thomas will stop flapping his gums now. NY did a great job.

Give it up dude. You are as bad as these hack writers who are just stirring up **** because they hate the Bruins. Nobody has talked about this for pages but you come in and have to throw this crap in for no reason. We are here to talk about hockey. Only you, Kevin Paul Dupont, Joe Haggerty, and the clowns at TMZ Sports.. err I mean ESPN give a **** about that. It has nothing to do with hockey, no effect on the play on the ice, and the only "distraction" is caused by the media not shutting the **** up about this ********. We don't care what Thomas writes on facebook, we care if he stops the damn puck or not.

Effortless is an understatement. The All Star Game was effortless. This was the Rangers making the Bruins look like a bunch of rookie chumps. The Rangers out hustled, out worked, and out played the Bruins. The only thing that they didn't do is out shoot them. The Rangers deserve to be in first based on that performance.

The Rangers out Bruin-ed the Bruins. Seriously. Let's see what happens tonight in Montreal. If the B's lay an egg again, CJ/PC might try some kind of shake-up. This upcoming 11-day road trip is going to be big for this team. However, it's too early to worry. Last year's team played under .500 in March and went on to win the cup, so we'll see what happens.

The 4th line is +1, +5, and +6 respectively for the season. The +1 is Thornton and the other two guys play on the PK and some on the PP. Krejci, the supposed #1 center, is attempting to do his best Phil Kessel 2010-2011 impression with a -5 -- a minus ****ing 5. Maybe he's just dogging it because he's only making $4M this year and the big money doesn't start until next season ($5.25M).

PK and PP time don't have any effect on +/- rating, it's even strength only. That said, Paille-Campbell-Thornton has been pretty good for us even during the slump. I thought they were the most consistent line last night as far as offensive pressure, etc. They have the last ES goal this team has scored (Paille from Thornton on Saturday).

The other lines are killing us. Marchand-Bergeron-Seguin has been good to as far as pressure and generating chances, but they can't get the puck in the net. Time to shake that up.

The other two lines with Lucic, Krejci, Peverley, Kelly, Caron, and Pouliot have just been plain awful. Lucic has been the only bright spot, and has actually looked damn good lately (Nashville on Saturday was one of the best games of his career). Krejci has looked like dog **** since the minute Horton got hurt. He is starting to get on my nerves and I feel like he is the main reason we are playing like crap.

Although I'd consider him the #2 center (Bergeron is clear cut #1, I don't care how they list the lines in the program or if LKH was considered #1 last year), he is playing the worst out of all four centers. PC needs to make a move or two before this deadline, and he needs to do it assuming that Horton is done for the year. If he comes back, that's bonus.


I know it's a dream, but if I was Pete Chiarelli I'd be on the phone daily with Anaheim trying my hardest to get make a deal involving Krejci and Bobby Ryan. Krejci, Ryan Spooner, and a 1st should get that done, and would give us a legitimate #1 line that would rival some of the best in the league. Lucic-Seguin-Ryan would be great, and you could put Peverley/Caron/Paille (or Horton if he comes back) with Marchand and Bergeron.

However, like I said, that's the dream scenario. Right now, CJ just needs to mix up the lines and try to get some results. You have four guys (Lucic, Bergeron, Marchand, Seguin) who are still playing decent. Put them in pairs and then go from there.

Marchand-Bergeron-Paille
Lucic-Kelly-Seguin
Pouliot*-Krejci-Peverley
Caron*-Campbell-Thornton

* could be replaced with a trade acquisition. If you can bring in a top 6 (or even a top 7 or 8) player, Paille slides down to one of the * spots and that acquisition goes in to Paille's slot. I like Paille's speed in that position with Marchand though. Bergeron and Marchand did well last year even with 42 year old Mark Recchi on their RW. I feel like Paille could fill that role well.

Don't even get me started on what they should do with Corvo.
 
Give it up dude. You are as bad as these hack writers who are just stirring up **** because they hate the Bruins. Nobody has talked about this for pages but you come in and have to throw this crap in for no reason. We are here to talk about hockey. Only you, Kevin Paul Dupont, Joe Haggerty, and the clowns at TMZ Sports.. err I mean ESPN give a **** about that. It has nothing to do with hockey, no effect on the play on the ice, and the only "distraction" is caused by the media not shutting the **** up about this ********. We don't care what Thomas writes on facebook, we care if he stops the damn puck or not.

Y'know, you would be taken a lot more seriously in here if you stopped with the asterisks and spoke with more respect to the other people participating in this thread. Do you see anyone else posting as aggressively as you do?

And Mooney mentioned it a few posts up- I don't see you yelling at him to shut up about it. Why is that?:rolleyes:

You don't actually know what his teammates think about what that clown has been doing. You don't, unless you're one of them. You don't know how it has affected him or how it has affected all of them as a team. You don't know if they're all annoyed for having to answer for Thomas, because he's decided he won't answer for himself.

I was going to post this link in the other thread, but I've decided to post it here instead:

http://articles.boston.com/2012-02-12/sports/31052827_1_tim-thomas-facebook-media

I think it's a very fair view on Thomas' behavior and the situation that he's selfishly created.
 
And Mooney mentioned it a few posts up- I don't see you yelling at him to shut up about it. Why is that?:rolleyes:

a) I live near him
b) We are both Bruins fans
c) I'm usually heavily armed :D

You don't actually know what his teammates think about what that clown has been doing. You don't, unless you're one of them. You don't know how it has affected him or how it has affected all of them as a team. You don't know if they're all annoyed for having to answer for Thomas, because he's decided he won't answer for himself.

I was going to post this link in the other thread, but I've decided to post it here instead:

http://articles.boston.com/2012-02-12/sports/31052827_1_tim-thomas-facebook-media

I think it's a very fair view on Thomas' behavior and the situation that he's selfishly created.

This was a very good article. I can tell you from several experiences that Timmy gets the biggest cheer BY FAR when announced at the games so maybe it isn't affecting how people see him. However, the article you posted articulates a lot of what I feel about the team. I wear a Thornton jersey to every home game because I think he's one of the hardest working guys on the team even though he's by far not the most talented. I have a Thomas jersey hanging in my office because I liked how he handled himself. My opinion of him is changing now though. Please do not use the fame that hockey has brought you for your political (or other) platform. And, if you decide to, then stand up for it. You are a public figure like it or not.

And, it's not just republicans. Don Henley, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, etc.. all sickening regardless of views.

I think that he meant to type "lifeless". ;)

Now I'm just exhausted. I'm not naive so I know that teams go through this in any given season. I can excuse lack of success but not lack of effort.
 
Give it up dude. You are as bad as these hack writers who are just stirring up **** because they hate the Bruins. Nobody has talked about this for pages but you come in and have to throw this crap in for no reason. We are here to talk about hockey. Only you, Kevin Paul Dupont, Joe Haggerty, and the clowns at TMZ Sports.. err I mean ESPN give a **** about that. It has nothing to do with hockey, no effect on the play on the ice, and the only "distraction" is caused by the media not shutting the **** up about this ********. We don't care what Thomas writes on facebook, we care if he stops the damn puck or not.

If Thomas would shut the hell up and do his job, people would stop talking/writing about it. He's shown himself to be a selfish, shameless attention whore.
 
Y'know, you would be taken a lot more seriously in here if you stopped with the asterisks and spoke with more respect to the other people participating in this thread. Do you see anyone else posting as aggressively as you do?

I don't put the asterisks in, the forum does. I'm not going to change the way I talk.. it is what it is. Why does this effect you so much?

You don't actually know what his teammates think about what that clown has been doing. You don't, unless you're one of them. You don't know how it has affected him or how it has affected all of them as a team. You don't know if they're all annoyed for having to answer for Thomas, because he's decided he won't answer for himself.

I was going to post this link in the other thread, but I've decided to post it here instead:

http://articles.boston.com/2012-02-12/sports/31052827_1_tim-thomas-facebook-media

Kevin Paul Dupont is absolutely the WORST "journalist" in Boston. All he does is stir the pot to generate clicks on his articles. They never have any substance and he never does anything but trash the Bruins.

a) I live near him
b) We are both Bruins fans
c) I'm usually heavily armed :D

This was a very good article. I can tell you from several experiences that Timmy gets the biggest cheer BY FAR when announced at the games so maybe it isn't affecting how people see him. However, the article you posted articulates a lot of what I feel about the team. I wear a Thornton jersey to every home game because I think he's one of the hardest working guys on the team even though he's by far not the most talented. I have a Thomas jersey hanging in my office because I liked how he handled himself. My opinion of him is changing now though. Please do not use the fame that hockey has brought you for your political (or other) platform. And, if you decide to, then stand up for it. You are a public figure like it or not.

If Thomas would shut the hell up and do his job, people would stop talking/writing about it. He's shown himself to be a selfish, shameless attention whore.

See this is what I do not understand. Tim Thomas can write whatever the hell he wants on Facebook, just like the thousands of other athletes who write things online on their personal time. It's a free country. He is free to have his personal beliefs, and he is free to post them online. It has NOTHING to do with him playing hockey. It has no bearing on his play on the ice. All of his teammates have their own political views too, and all of them, like Thomas, leave them outside of work because it does not matter.

It's not like Tim Thomas is coming in to his interviews with the media and using it as a forum to preach his political beliefs. He comes to the rink, plays hockey, talks about hockey, and then goes home. He IS doing his job.

This is entirely driven by the media. These reporters, who are supposed to be hockey reporters, feel the need to come in to the locker room and hound Thomas, his teammates, and coaches about somebody's personal views posted on Facebook. It's absolutely ridiculous. The reporters are the ones who aren't doing their jobs. Why can't they just talk about hockey like they are supposed to do? They aren't political reporters working for MSNBC or tabloid journalists for Entertainment Tonight.

The problem is when these so-called hockey reporters go in to the locker room and harass these players about these personal issues completely unrelated to their jobs of playing hockey. The players are there to play hockey, and they are supposed to talk to the media after playing about hockey, not about their personal lives.

Instead, these writers feel the need to incessantly hound the players about things unrelated to hockey. It's no different than tabloid journalism now. They write articles about these personal issues to generate buzz and advertising revenue. Then when the players won't discuss the issue, and instead try to focus on hockey, they write articles complaining about the player. They make a huge "controversy" over it and call the player a distraction. They hound all the players teammates about it to help their "distraction" argument. It happens all the time, and it's done solely to make these media guys more money. They know it will generate clicks, get people talking about it, and they will profit. There are no ethics in journalism anymore.

I saw an interview last week with Tim Thomas. He stated explicitly at the beginning of the video that he was there to talk about hockey. The first question? It was about his facebook. He told the reporters he was not there to talk about that, and that he was there to talk about hockey. Next question? Still not about hockey. He then politely told them that the next time anyone asked him a question that wasn't related to hockey, he was going to end the interview right there. The next question? Still not about hockey. At that point, Thomas calmly said "I'm out. Peace." and then he ended the interview.

That video greatly increased my respect for Thomas, and further reinforced my growing hatred of the media. I actually started college as a media studies major, but I have become so irritated with these ridiculous practices by the media that I don't see myself ever going to work in the industry. Regardless of how I feel about Thomas skipping the White House visit, it is a free country, and one of the great things of this country is that he can do whatever he wants to. I can respect that. It is his personal view, and ALL of his personal views have no effect on my life. I have my own views too. Why can't the media just understand this, leave it alone, and do their jobs of reporting on hockey?

I guess that is wishful thinking now with the money-driven media monster in this country, but I really wish more people would open their eyes to this and actually see what is really happening in these situations.
 
I don't put the asterisks in, the forum does. I'm not going to change the way I talk.. it is what it is. Why does this effect you so much?

I know you don't actually type the asterisks. There's a filter? Really?:rolleyes:

It bothers me because there are better ways to express oneself than by swearing constantly.


Kevin Paul Dupont is absolutely the WORST "journalist" in Boston. All he does is stir the pot to generate clicks on his articles. They never have any substance and he never does anything but trash the Bruins.

<snip>

In your opinion. Seems like Mooney, myself, and Bob MacKenzie (who tweeted the article this morning) think it was a very well-written piece that explains the reason Thomas doesn't get to have two different worlds. I'm sorry, but if you're a public figure, you can't say something controversial and then not expect to be questioned about it by the media or fans. He doesn't get a free pass. He's brought this on himself.

This isn't only about the White House thing. He's posted a couple of times since then, and you know it.

He wants it to end? He should stop posting this kind of stuff. The media are only doing their job- they're following a continuously developing story, which continues to develop because Thomas keeps posting.

If he wants his personal opinions to stay personal, then he shouldn't make them public. Once he makes them public, it is fair game to question him about them.
 
I know you don't actually type the asterisks. There's a filter? Really?:rolleyes:

It bothers me because there are better ways to express oneself than by swearing constantly.




In your opinion. Seems like Mooney, myself, and Bob MacKenzie (who tweeted the article this morning) think it was a very well-written piece that explains the reason Thomas doesn't get to have two different worlds. I'm sorry, but if you're a public figure, you can't say something controversial and then not expect to be questioned about it by the media or fans. He doesn't get a free pass. He's brought this on himself.

This isn't only about the White House thing. He's posted a couple of times since then, and you know it.

He wants it to end? He should stop posting this kind of stuff. The media are only doing their job- they're following a continuously developing story, which continues to develop because Thomas keeps posting.

If he wants his personal opinions to stay personal, then he shouldn't make them public. Once he makes them public, it is fair game to question him about them.

Exactly. If he doesn't like the attention, all he has to do is knock it off and focus on playing hockey. If he didn't want the attention from the WH thing, all he had to do was not say anything. Instead, he made a huge announcement, and made the whole event about himself, rather than the team.
 
Zioxide - I actually mostly agree with the lengthy post above. I think the media is making more out of this than it deserves. But, Surely and Lee just put it pretty well... public figures are, well, in the public. And in a perfect world the celebs can separate themselves but the world isn't perfect and they are celebs because the public made them that way (they are also wealthy and have a platform because of it).

I've run marketing for a over a decade and if I were the PR person I would have hit this head on and ended it - IF TIMMY WANTED TO. Timmy wants the public attention otherwise he wouldn't have put the reason for not going to the WH on FB and kept posting things.

In any case, he is within the NHL's social media rules...
 
It wasn't Boston rocky, but not the best. Let's hope the Wings make it 23+ to stuff all the purists up. The game is a completely different game today -- it's not even apples and oranges. Can't really compare the three.

That still wouldn't convince the purists. I'm not a purist, but I can see their point that an asterisk should be next to the Wings' record. Without the shootout, they would have had a tie at around the 13th game into the streak. That would have ended the win streak in either of those other eras.

I'm not trying to take away from their accomplishment, believe me, but you're right that the streaks shouldn't be compared.


It's looking pretty bad in Chicago. They only have a 3-5 point cushion on teams #9-11 in the West and they're in the toughest division in the NHL. I really doubt they would fall that far, but you never know.

It could happen. I believe that they've lost 9 in a row. Look at where Minnesota and even Edmonton were at the beginning of the season and where they are now. Anything could happen.
 
That still wouldn't convince the purists. I'm not a purist, but I can see their point that an asterisk should be next to the Wings' record. Without the shootout, they would have had a tie at around the 13th game into the streak. That would have ended the win streak in either of those other eras.

I'm not trying to take away from their accomplishment, believe me, but you're right that the streaks shouldn't be compared.

Admittedly, I'm a Wings fan, but this is an objective comment:

Yeah, the streak includes shootout wins - and the streak would have ended a while back if it didn't, but A LOT has changed since those two streaks. All the rule changes that have been made since then have contributed to the current streak, just as rule changes made after the first streak made the second possible.

Bottom line: a win is a win, as long as the rules are followed.
 
^^^^Good points as well. I really can see it both ways. Both sides have legit reasoning.

All I know is that they've got one hell of a team.
 
Oh look, Brad Marchand with another cheap low clipping penalty. How shocking.


Leafs and Edmonton are tied at 2-2 so far. It's nice to finally watch a Leaf game that starts at 7pm in my time zone. Luke Schenn is a healthy scratch. Yikes.
 
Woah.....that was a nerve-wracking game. Thankfully we pulled out of Edmonton with an OT win (it shouldn't have gone to OT in the first place).


The Oil are going to be scary good in a couple of years. Scary good.
 
Oh look, Brad Marchand with another cheap low clipping penalty. How shocking.


Leafs and Edmonton are tied at 2-2 so far. It's nice to finally watch a Leaf game that starts at 7pm in my time zone. Luke Schenn is a healthy scratch. Yikes.

Marchand reminds me of a player named Darcy Tucker, can't seem to recall what team Tucker played for though.
 
Oh look, Brad Marchand with another cheap low clipping penalty. How shocking.


Leafs and Edmonton are tied at 2-2 so far. It's nice to finally watch a Leaf game that starts at 7pm in my time zone. Luke Schenn is a healthy scratch. Yikes.

That was a stupid play. Not smart to get a penalty like that at 20:00 in the period.

He's going to get it for this. The bigger problem is Peverley getting hurt again.
 
He's going to get it for this.

From who? It wasn't the Salo hit. Marchand's ass hit Emelin in the hip. Isn't that a hip check? Clipping is a hit to the knees, and from the slow mo, it's clear its on the hip and not knees. It looks worse maybe because Marchand is short. Emelin isn't exactly a saint on skates anyways. He had some questionable antics last night too. League already said there is nothing to see here.


Worried about Peverley. Without Peverley and Horton, Chiarelli needs to bring in another top 6 winger. No excuses.

How about this goal:

 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.