^ That photo should be titled "Kicking Brave John Terry up the Arse"
twietee said:
Spotted a heap of earnest looking Brits in Lederhosen 😱
They weren't even drunk: is this the beginning of a new uncanny era?!
That's amazing.
😀 If any of you have ever read Jerome K. Jerome's delightful
Three Men on the Bummel, you'll know that Englishmen have been hilariously mis-dressing for Germany since the Victorian Era.
Those leather shorts can be awfully chaffing. So I hear, like.
😱
Meanwhile, our favourite lionhearted defender will need to muster all of his legendary bravery and courage – John 'JT' Terry has been handed
a four match ban and £220,000 fine.
Now
here's a puzzle:
The FA said:
"Mr Suárez used insulting words towards Mr Evra during the match contrary to FA Rule E3(1);
"the insulting words used by Mr Suárez included a reference to Mr Evra's colour within the meaning of Rule E3(2);
"Mr Suárez shall be warned as to his future conduct, be suspended for eight matches covering all first-team competitive matches and fined the sum of £40,000;
The FA said:
The Football Association charged Mr Terry on Friday 27 July 2012 with using abusive and/or insulting words and/or behaviour towards Queens Park Rangers' Anton Ferdinand and which included a reference to colour and/or race contrary to FA Rule E3[2] in relation to the Queens Park Rangers FC versus Chelsea FC fixture at Loftus Road on 23 October 2011.
<snip>
The decision of the Independent Regulatory Commission is as follows:
::Mr Terry be suspended from all domestic club football until such time as Chelsea's First Team have completed four competitive matches
::Fined the sum of £220,000
This is just idiocy. Why the differential treatment? I think 8 games versus 4 is a much tougher punishment, never mind the money (the games hurt the team, the money hurts the player, but Terry makes much more than Suarez so the net effect is probably small in financial terms. But Liverpool lost their player for twice as long as Chelsea will?). Their transgressions were nearly identical (Suarez used the term "negro", Terry the term "black"), and their manner of defense was almost identical "Yes I said it, but it's not what you think!".
Why would the FA set a precedent with the Suarez case and then promptly deviate from it in an almost identical case? 4 games is a huge difference.
By the way, I am not contesting Suarez's punishment, he behaved stupidly and paid the price for that. But given that the charges and nature of the offense are nearly identical, why is the punishment so different? Or rather, what is their reasoning for the difference? The FA have now opened themselves to a charge of xenophobia and you can bet that many foreign players and fans may interperet it as such. Brave John Terry gets a 4 game ban for racism, while Hated Buck-Toothed Johnny Foreigner gets an 8 game ban for essentially the same offense. Hmmm.
🙄