They are missing a whole lot of pieces right now. But lately the Superbowl winner has been the team that's gotten their act together and been strong over the last three to four games of the season. Sometimes it's later than that.
As long as a team doesn't ruin its playoff chances in the first ten weeks, the first three months of the season is nearly irrelevant.
I can't tell anything about the Pats from the first two games other than they are lucky not to be 0-2.
Exactly.
There's so much turnover in the league every year now that the first half of the season is spent just getting in sync with all the new guys. Look no further than the Pats defense last year... horrendous for the first half of the year, then they trade for Talib at the deadline, move McCourty over to safety, and it's a whole different defense.
The silver lining is that the Pats played like **** and they're still 2-0. They will get better.. the majority of teams get better as the year progresses unless there's lots of key injuries.
People also underestimate how much of an impact a healthy Gronk will have on this offense. If he's healthy and playing, he commands double coverage on every play. That means one of Amendola or Edelman is going to be open... you can't double cover all three of them.
But you said it right.. it's not about who plays well at the beginning of the year, it's who plays well at the end of the year. As long as a team doesn't play so bad to fall completely out of contention in the first half of the year, if they have a strong second half, they'll be in great shape. That doesn't just go for the Pats.. that goes for every team in the league. Look at the 07 Giants after all that beat the Pats in the Super Bowl... pretty sure they didn't have a very good regular season, but got hot going into January and carried that momentum.
Also I saw this on Facebook earlier, though they might need to release an update for Geno Smith:
