Yes what I was saying from the beginning. Not speaking formally. You thought you were correcting me the first time, but you didn’t understand what I was saying. That’s on you.America is used COLLOQUIALLY in English to refer to the USA.
Yes what I was saying from the beginning. Not speaking formally. You thought you were correcting me the first time, but you didn’t understand what I was saying. That’s on you.America is used COLLOQUIALLY in English to refer to the USA.
No, you said more people called the USA America than the continent.Yes what I was saying from the beginning. Not speaking formally. You thought you were correcting me the first time, but you didn’t understand what I was saying. That’s on you.
There are more than 500 million native Spanish speakers. They call the USA "Norteamérica" or "Estados Unidos".
No, you said more people called the USA America than the continent.
There are more than 500 million native Spanish speakers. They call the USA "Norteamérica" or "Estados Unidos".
I guess you will agree that the USA is not North America. Brazil were also technically "United States" before.
Not arguing with anyone but when referring to Asians; those from Israel, Jorden, Pakistan, Iraq, Lebanon, and India aren’t the first to come to mind.
I think in some countries the would call people from the USA just "Americano" and in others "Norteamericano".When they call someone Americano, they just mean someone from the continent?
I know what you were saying.That’s not what I was talking about. You said there were no countries south of America. I was referring the the USA as America. Again on you for not knowing what I was saying. Most people know what I mean.
Maybe they don't call them Americans, but in certain contexts they call them Americanos.I don’t understand. It’s a universal term for the USA to be called America and citizens are called Americans. No one calls people from Argentina, Brazil, or Mexico Americans.
I think in some countries the would call people from the USA just "Americano"...
That would be Mexican influence.I’m usually called gringo by my Hispanic friends.
I’m usually called gringo by my Hispanic friends.
Certain Asian friends call me gweilo and one particular friend calls me da biza. I refer to her as xiao biza. Haha.
Fun match between Poland and Colombia.
They are def more aggressive.I think Colombia are the better team. They just aren’t finishing.
They are def more aggressive.
No I just prefer teams that matter not Argentina that chokes on the world stage. I have been watching football for well over 20 years. I am not talking about historically. I am talking about current football. There is no central or South American teams that are worth watching other than Brazil. They are the only one that can hang with European teams.
Colombia comprehensively hammer Poland by three goals to nil.
And Poland can have no complaint for they fully deserve this result.
first of all, there is a bunch of South american players in europe. with that comment i can tell you DONT know squat about football, stick to playing fifa on your old xbox. south american teams are better nowadays. brazil USED to be good but not anymore .....7-1 remember?
[doublepost=1529879977][/doublepost]did anyone see that assist from James to Cuadrado, holy moly!
I felt like every time i looked at the telly someone from the COL team was on a break all by themselves.![]()
Look: This is not what I hope (or would like) to see....I am a European, after all.
However: Nothing about Poland suggested the remotest possibility of victory - they did not deserve to win, and, one cannot applaud such uselessness on the pitch, even if one hails from - and would like to see - European teams do well.
Look: This is not what I hope (or would like) to see....I am a European, after all.
However: Nothing about Poland suggested the remotest possibility of victory - they did not deserve to win, and, one cannot applaud such uselessness on the pitch, even if one hails from - and would like to see - European teams do well.
Haha this is a joke. Because South American players play in Europe that means their national teams are good? Please. Go get some football knowledge. Argentina is a joke, but have some great individual players.
Columbia looked like they wanted that game more. They played harder, and just looked like they were hungry.
I said the national teams were not as good as the European teams this year. Your argument was that some South American players play in Europe for club teams. That doesn’t mean anything since I am not talking about club football. There is not a national team in South America right now other than maybe Brazil that has a chance of winning the WC.youre the one who said south amercians cant "hang in europe" i dont care about argentina
whats columbia? its spelled Colombia. thats like if i spelled England like this: Ingland
I said the national teams were not as good as the European teams this year. Your argument was that some South American players play in Europe for club teams. That doesn’t mean anything since I am not talking about club football. There is not a national team in South America right now other than maybe Brazil that has a chance of winning the WC.
Pardon my typo. Someone gets real bent out of shape when South American teams get talked about poorly. Sorry I am just stating the obvious. The clear favorites right now after two group stage games are European teams. Please tell me a none European team that has a shot right now?