Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Excellent post.

Ah, yes.

An excellent and important distinction and an important question, one that needs to be asked of the game, or that the game needs to ask of itself.

However, unfortunately, the bleak but gloomy answer that suggests itself is that it is considerably easier (for a club) to fire one person (a manager, a coach) than to fire the eleven - or fifteen - underperforming yet overpaid individuals who comprise the team or squad.
Or...the long contracts mean that if/when a new manager comes in and wants to clean house, they have players with enough time left on their contracts to make them valuable in the transfer market, rather than having to sell them on in a fire sale frenzy, to get at least something for them, rather than running out a short contract and going on a free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
You have seen Southgate's selections in the past, right? He doesn't often select on merit. It's mostly jobs for the boys and reputation speaks far more loudly than current form, for him.
With that said, it's a formula that has been (at least in part) working.
Well if ETH uses Maguire the same way he did the season gone that means Maguire is due to get less than 10 games comes the new season (played 8 season just gone) and with Euro 2024 just round the corner, Southgate is going to have a hard time justifying Maguires inclusion into the team. Using the excuse of international game experience is only going to get Southgate so far, especially if other players in the same position get more game time than Maguire.

It would be squeaky bum time for Southgate if he released the squad names for Euro 2024 and Maguires name is on it. A sports journalist is bound to ask the question 'Southgate, how can you justify giving a player a spot in the squad when they are not a first team regular and just used as a bit part player who comes off the bench'. If Southgate replies that there is no one better than Maguire in that position then it would prove what a dire situation the England team are in if a bit part player gets picked because the manager considers there is no one else better.
 
Well if ETH uses Maguire the same way he did the season gone that means Maguire is due to get less than 10 games comes the new season (played 8 season just gone) and with Euro 2024 just round the corner, Southgate is going to have a hard time justifying Maguires inclusion into the team. Using the excuse of international game experience is only going to get Southgate so far, especially if other players in the same position get more game time than Maguire.

It would be squeaky bum time for Southgate if he released the squad names for Euro 2024 and Maguires name is on it. A sports journalist is bound to ask the question 'Southgate, how can you justify giving a player a spot in the squad when they are not a first team regular and just used as a bit part player who comes off the bench'. If Southgate replies that there is no one better than Maguire in that position then it would prove what a dire situation the England team are in if a bit part player gets picked because the manager considers there is no one else better.
He gets asked that every time he selects a squad. There's always players in form who are not chosen while out of form non-regulars for club are constantly given squad or starting positions. It's worked for him thus far, but he'll hopefully quit that tactic, or lose his position as gaffer next time.
 
He gets asked that every time he selects a squad. There's always players in form who are not chosen while out of form non-regulars for club are constantly given squad or starting positions. It's worked for him thus far, but he'll hopefully quit that tactic, or lose his position as gaffer next time.
I have to be honest, I didn't bother with 2022 world cup so did not know who was picked but I just did some checking and noticed Maguire was picked!!!. He had only played I think 1 or 2 games I think before the world cup and Southgate still picked him!!!! no wonder Maguire is able to think like he is if Southgate considers a player who only had 2 league games prior to the World cup the best center back the country has!!!! Man oh man what a disgrace. So that changes a lot of things in what I've said. If Maguire knows having only a few league games under his belt is still enough to keep him in the England squad then he knows his position is not under threat and thus can just be a bench player, get a few games here and there. If Southgate is going to pick him with when he is rarely playing, there is no motivation for Maguire to put more effort into wanting to get more games because he knows the chances are he will still be picked for international duty. In his head it will be 'if Southgate picks me when only have 1/2 league games under my belt, he will will do the same again'. Therefore Maguire does not need to push himself into wanting to get more games at United or at any club for that matter because Southgate would probably still pick him. Therefore what I've said for the most part still stands, Maguire has no incentive to leave United to a club that will give him more game time because he does not need to. Therefore he can just see out his contract and watch the money role in from his wages whilst doing very little at United. Quids in as many would say.
 
Why the obsession with Harry Maguire, his current status, current wages (doubtless a function of having been a member of a team when they qualified for the Champion's League), his future?

Irrespective of his actual appearances on the pitch last season, he clearly brought other qualities to the game (and dressing room and team) as he had been selected as, and had served as, the actual club captain (until, that is, a few short days ago).

If we are discussing moral black holes, to be candid, there are far greater examples of egregious choices (anyone heading off to grace Saudi Arabia's football leagues with their presence comes to mind), not to mention the sportswashing of the state owned clubs, that we can call upon than that of Harry Maguire.

It is always a shock to a player (especially an established player, one who is on a strong contract) to discover - bluntly, (in other words, a discovery not finessed by diplomatic fibs and fictions, stuff such as "he has a groin injury, which is why he is not coming with us on this pre-season tour") even if the growing evidence had been pointing towards drawing such a conclusion - that they are completely surplus to the requirements of a manager and that manager's plans and ambitions.

Maguire (and his advisers and agents, and presumably his family) will need to sit down, take stock, and work out what they wish - and want - to do, and whether this is open to them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: HandsomeDanNZ
I have to be honest, I didn't bother with 2022 world cup so did not know who was picked but I just did some checking and noticed Maguire was picked!!!. He had only played I think 1 or 2 games I think before the world cup and Southgate still picked him!!!! no wonder Maguire is able to think like he is if Southgate considers a player who only had 2 league games prior to the World cup the best center back the country has!!!! Man oh man what a disgrace. So that changes a lot of things in what I've said. If Maguire knows having only a few league games under his belt is still enough to keep him in the England squad then he knows his position is not under threat and thus can just be a bench player, get a few games here and there. If Southgate is going to pick him with when he is rarely playing, there is no motivation for Maguire to put more effort into wanting to get more games because he knows the chances are he will still be picked for international duty. In his head it will be 'if Southgate picks me when only have 1/2 league games under my belt, he will will do the same again'. Therefore Maguire does not need to push himself into wanting to get more games at United or at any club for that matter because Southgate would probably still pick him. Therefore what I've said for the most part still stands, Maguire has no incentive to leave United to a club that will give him more game time because he does not need to. Therefore he can just see out his contract and watch the money role in from his wages whilst doing very little at United. Quids in as many would say.
Your ability to tell us all how Harry Maguire is thinking is fascinating. You must spend a lot of time with him to know him so well. Thank you for educating us all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Why the obsession with Harry Maguire, his current status, current wages (doubtless a function of having been a member of a team when they qualified for the Champion's League), his future?

Irrespective of his actual appearances on the pitch last season, he clearly brought other qualities to the game (and dressing room and team) as he had been selected as, and had served as, the actual club captain (until, that is, a few short days ago).

If we are discussing moral black holes, to be candid, there are far greater examples of egregious choices (anyone heading off to grace Saudi Arabia's football leagues with their presence comes to mind) that we can call upon than that of Harry Maguire.

It is always a shock to a player (especially an established player, one who is on a strong contract) to discover - bluntly, (in other words, a discovery not finessed by diplomatic fibs and fictions stuff such as "he has a groin njury, which is why he is not coming with us on this pre-season tour") even if the growing evidence had been pointing towards drawing a conclusion in that direction - that they are completely surplus to the requirements of a manager and that manager's plans and ambitions.

Maguire (and his advisers and agents, and presumably his family) will need to sit down, take stock, and work out what they wish - and want - to do, and whether this is open to them.
Agreed. Sometimes a player may choose to stay at a bigger club because they feel they will be able to force their way back into the managers plans. Or the manager may have given them some assurances that things are about to change.
Having the best 11 players in the world does not win championships. You need a bigger squad than that. You need to have players that are able to come in and do a job when others are injured, suspended or fatigued.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Why the obsession with Harry Maguire, his current status, current wages (doubtless a function of having been a member of a team when they qualified for the Champion's League), his future?

Irrespective of his actual appearances on the pitch last season, he clearly brought other qualities to the game (and dressing room and team) as he had been selected as, and had served as, the actual club captain (until, that is, a few short days ago).

If we are discussing moral black holes, to be candid, there are far greater examples of egregious choices (anyone heading off to grace Saudi Arabia's football leagues with their presence comes to mind) that we can call upon than that of Harry Maguire.

It is always a shock to a player (especially an established player, one who is on a strong contract) to discover - bluntly, (in other words, a discovery not finessed by diplomatic fibs and fictions, stuff such as "he has a groin injury, which is why he is not coming with us on this pre-season tour") even if the growing evidence had been pointing towards drawing such a conclusion - that they are completely surplus to the requirements of a manager and that manager's plans and ambitions.

Maguire (and his advisers and agents, and presumably his family) will need to sit down, take stock, and work out what they wish - and want - to do, and whether this is open to them.
It is not obsession, I am just generating topics of discussion that I feel are relevant in todays society when it comes to football players and the reason I have gone as far as I have is because of yours and others defense of him for the way he behaves. You are all very reluctant to pour scorn on players even when they deserve it in my opinion.
 
Your ability to tell us all how Harry Maguire is thinking is fascinating. You must spend a lot of time with him to know him so well. Thank you for educating us all.
Human nature can be very predictable at times. It does not take a genius to know how a human will behave when certain factors are put before them.
 
It is not obsession, I am just generating topics of discussion that I feel are relevant in todays society when it comes to football players and the reason I have gone as far as I have is because of yours and others defense of him for the way he behaves. You are all very reluctant to pour scorn on players even when they deserve it in my opinion.
Condemning someone you don’t know for something they haven’t even decided upon yet?
As @Scepticalscribe stated there are worse things being done by state owned clubs and players cashing in for a bit of sportswashing.

You do seem rather obsessed with Harry Maguire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Condemning someone you don’t know for something they haven’t even decided upon yet?
As @Scepticalscribe stated there are worse things being done by state owned clubs and players cashing in for a bit of sportswashing.

You do seem rather obsessed with Harry Maguire.
Why are you calling it an obsession? You guys reply to my post and then I reply back. You guys reply again and I again reply back. It's called 'debating'. If you do not want to keep a debate going about a certain topic then don't reply to the posts.

Oh and have to lol at your first line. Did you not read the press yesterday or the day before about Maguires 'demand'? He is demanding that if United want to transfer him he want's them to pay out the remaining of his contract. So yes, Maguire has made his decision. He does not want to be transferred, he want's to stay and see out his contract because if a player WANTS to leave, they do not ask to have their contract paid up first.. Like I said, human behavior is predictable when certain factors are put before them.
 
Why are you calling it an obsession? You guys reply to my post and then I reply back. You guys reply again and I again reply back. It's called 'debating'. If you do not want to keep a debate going about a certain topic then don't reply to the posts.

Oh and have to lol at your first line. Did you not read the press yesterday or the day before about Maguires 'demand'? He is demanding that if United want to transfer him he want's them to pay out the remaining of his contract. So yes, Maguire has made his decision. He does not want to be transferred, he want's to stay and see out his contract because if a player WANTS to leave, they do not ask to have their contract paid up first.. Like I said, human behavior is predictable when certain factors are put before them.
As I’m not obsessed by him I probably don’t read as much about him as you do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
As I’m not obsessed by him I probably don’t read as much about him as you do.
Well it's very difficult to miss when your reading the sports pages of a newspaper and there he is as the main sports headline. He's news and thus I am debating about him, nothing more.
 
In a way, Maguire is almost a footballing tragedy, (much in the way that Joe Hart was).

At the very top club level, the game has evolved beyond his abilities or what he can bring to a team from a tactical perspective. Moreover, once a manager with a reforming agenda decides that you are superfluous to their plans, in general, your time at that club will have come to a close, irrespective of the strength or length of your contract.

Now, for a team such as Leicester, he was a perfectly good player, and a fine leader on the pitch.

However, his shortcomings as a defender were exposed when he was transferred to Manchester United, yet, as long as he had the support of - and crucially, the confidence of - his then manager (Ole Gunnar Solskjaer) - his form was fine, if possibly not quite good enough for Manchester United, especially if they were seeking trophies and a Champion's League spot.

That changed dramatically once Solskjaer was replaced by ETH who clearly had little faith in Maguire, - which, in turn, must have had an effect on his form - and equally clearly, believes that he can bring little to the vision for the future of the club that ETH wishes to promote and pursue, or to the style of football that ETH prefers.

Nevertheless, as an international, in general, his form has been good, and, at times, very good.

Again, the fact that he clearly enjoyed the support and confidence of his manager (Gareth Southgate) had an impact on his form as an international, as did the fact that - nowadays - international football (because, firstly, the players do not play together for any length of time, and secondly, because nowadays, unlike in the past, the best club teams are far better than almost every international side and play a more evolved and sophisticated form of football than you will find at international level, where, paradoxically, a player with more straightforward virtues - such as Maguire - is more likely to find favour and form) is not as developed - tactically - as the very best football at club level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Silencio
In a way, Maguire is almost a footballing tragedy, (much in the way that Joe Hart was).

At the very top club level, the game has evolved beyond his abilities or what he can bring to a team from a tactical perspective. Moreover, once a manager with a reforming agenda decides that you are superfluous to their plans, in general, your time at that club will have come to a close, irrespective of the strength or length of your contract.

Now, for a team such as Leicester, he was a perfectly good player, and a fine leader on the pitch.

However, his shortcomings as a defender were exposed when he was transferred to Manchester United, yet, as long as he had the support of - and crucially, the confidence of - his then manager (Ole Gunnar Solskjaer) - his form was fine, if possibly not quite good enough for Manchester United, especially if they were seeking trophies and a Champion's League spot.

That changed dramatically once Solskjaer was replaced by ETH who clearly had little faith in Maguire, - which, in turn, must have had an effect on his form - and equally clearly, believes that he can bring little to the vision for the future of the club that ETH wishes to promote and pursue, or to the style of football that ETH prefers.

Nevertheless, as an international, in general, his form has been good, and, at times, very good.

Again, the fact that he clearly enjoyed the support and confidence of his manager (Gareth Southgate) had an impact on his form as an international, as did the fact that - nowadays - international football (because, firstly, the players do not play together for any length of time, and secondly, because nowadays, unlike in the past, the best club teams are far better than almost every international side and play a more evolved and sophisticated form of football than you will find at international level, where, paradoxically, a player with more straightforward virtues - such as Maguire - is more likely to find favour and form) is not as developed - tactically - as the very best football at club level.
Also because the international players are as you rightly point out rarely playing together, there is a very valid reason for trying to keep the core team the same as much as possible.
Defenders particularly play better when they have a long term partnership with others. Then you know what your teammates strengths and weaknesses are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Also because the international players are as you rightly point out rarely playing together, there is a very valid reason for trying to keep the core team the same as much as possible.
Defenders particularly play better when they have a long term partnership with others. Then you know what your teammates strengths and weaknesses are.
Exactly.

Precisely because they play together so seldom, it is important to try to keep the core of the team much the same as often as possible, and for players - especially defenders - to be able to develop partnerships with those alongside whom they play, and to get to know the strengths and weaknesses of their team mates.
 
In a way, Maguire is almost a footballing tragedy, (much in the way that Joe Hart was).

At the very top club level, the game has evolved beyond his abilities or what he can bring to a team from a tactical perspective. Moreover, once a manager with a reforming agenda decides that you are superfluous to their plans, in general, your time at that club will have come to a close, irrespective of the strength or length of your contract.

Now, for a team such as Leicester, he was a perfectly good player, and a fine leader on the pitch.

However, his shortcomings as a defender were exposed when he was transferred to Manchester United, yet, as long as he had the support of - and crucially, the confidence of - his then manager (Ole Gunnar Solskjaer) - his form was fine, if possibly not quite good enough for Manchester United, especially if they were seeking trophies and a Champion's League spot.

That changed dramatically once Solskjaer was replaced by ETH who clearly had little faith in Maguire, - which, in turn, must have had an effect on his form - and equally clearly, believes that he can bring little to the vision for the future of the club that ETH wishes to promote and pursue, or to the style of football that ETH prefers.

Nevertheless, as an international, in general, his form has been good, and, at times, very good.

Again, the fact that he clearly enjoyed the support and confidence of his manager (Gareth Southgate) had an impact on his form as an international, as did the fact that - nowadays - international football (because, firstly, the players do not play together for any length of time, and secondly, because nowadays, unlike in the past, the best club teams are far better than almost every international side and play a more evolved and sophisticated form of football than you will find at international level, where, paradoxically, a player with more straightforward virtues - such as Maguire - is more likely to find favour and form) is not as developed - tactically - as the very best football at club level.
But do you not find that based on what you've written, that it is a bit concerning that Southgate would chose a central defender that is not only out of favor with his club but out of form?. Maguires form and performance in the world cup was impressive and I am sure it got many United fans talking about why he was not able to produce the same form and performance for his club.

Surely there must be an English central defender out there who plays regularly, is on form and produces good game performances or does that not matter anymore as a benchmark for becoming an England player?
 
Exactly.

Precisely because they play together so seldom, it is important to try to keep the core of the team much the same as often as possible, and for players - especially defenders - to be able to develop partnerships with those alongside whom they play, and to get to know the strengths and weaknesses of their team mates.
So even if Maguire only played 1 league game, are you are saying that togetherness and cohesion are more important factors than club form and club performance to becoming an England player?
 
But do you not find that based on what you've written, that it is a bit concerning that Southgate would chose a central defender that is not only out of favor with his club but out of form?.
He is out of form with his club, not with the international team.

And that is because what the club requires, he is not able to supply.

However, he is still able to deliver at international level, not least because it is a less developed form of football.

Moreover, he may be able to play a key role at a club that does not come with the demands of Manchester United.
Maguires form and performance in the world cup was impressive and I am sure it got many United fans talking about why he was not able to produce the same form and performance for his club.
Because, firstly, at the very top level, club football is far more developed, more evolved, than international football.

These days, most of the top club teams are far better than almost all of the international teams.

And, secondly, even if an international manager was able to call upon some of the very best players in the world for international duty (as was the case with Brazil of old, or that legendary Dutch team from the 1970s), he will not have enough time to drill them, coach them, teach them the skills that the top club teams have a full season - plus several days of training per week - and - in the case of the state clubs, bottomless resources - to implement.

The time international managers have with players is simply too short (and the resources, too limited) for them to be able to develop something exceptionally advanced, or sophisticated, in a short space of time and expect the players (usually, already exhausted from a season of football, and possibly stressed by the impossible and occasionally insane demands of international supporters, whose lexicon is nationalism, and national identity, rather than regional or local identity) to have mastered this, no matter how emotionally motivated and committed they may be to wearing their country's jersey and performing on the international stage.

Worse, England's supporters have had a history of being unusually demanding of, and intolerant of, their team.
Surely there must be an English central defender out there who plays regularly, is on form and produces good game performances or does that not matter anymore as a benchmark for becoming an England player?

Such a player must also be able to work within - and work well within - the actual team that has been selected; Southgate does not have the player options of Manchester City, or Manchester United, or Chelsea, or Arsenal, to name four clubs - to call upon, when selecting a team.

He can only call upon English players, some of whom are excellent, but many of whom are merely very good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Silencio
So even if Maguire only played 1 league game,
As long as he is fit - and as long as Gareth Southgate rates him - I would go so far as to say no league game, though, obviously, that is not a situation that could continue very long.
are you are saying that togetherness and cohesion are more important factors than club form and club performance to becoming an England player?
You really are pushing this.

But, yes, I suppose I am.

The last thing an international team needs is an exceptionally talented misfit, who will unbalance the team, or an extremely gifted ego-maniac who insists that the team be built around him.

That worked - for a while - for Portugal with CR7, but would not work with England.

The best international teams work best as teams.
 
My eyes hurt, having inadvertently seen (silly me, I googled "Arsenal News") some images of the team (on their pre-season US tour) in that truly horrific psychedelic away strip; good grief, it is hideous.

Sigh.

I know it is a first world problem - but my aesthetic sense is, dare one say, offended; imagine the embarrassment of actually lifting a trophy - any trophy - attired in such an appalling strip.
 
Allen Saint Maximin may be the next name for Saudi and Newcastle are open to selling if they land Harvey Barnes.

Lukaku, Partey also still on Saudi radar

Telles gone to Saudi from Utd

They've basically assembled a league within 2 windows

Saudi League CEO sharing the state vision
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.