Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, according to this review, after a 20 minutes graphic intensive testing, the A19 Pro on the iPhone Air is worse than the A19, and that's after a couple of tests, one of them inside a fridge to keep the Air as cool as possible:


Sounds to me like the A19 Pro version used in the Air is powered down to assist with battery life or something?. Definitely gimmicky.
Under his review it sounds like it was downgraded for prevention of cooling issues.
 
Of course the speaker stinks. The earpiece speaker is tiny. And some of you were legit trying to tell me that Apple has the magic to make it sound good. 😆

If you don’t care, that’s fine. But most people take advantage of the stereo speakers on an iPhone. I have no idea why Apple couldn’t offer stereo speakers when the S25 Edge has them. It’s an enormous flaw for this device. Obviously they will remedy this with future Air editions.
Maybe because Apple wanted a thinner phone than Samsung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garethe86
I shouldn't be surprised at how many people are defending a tiny mono speaker in a $1,000 near flagship phone just because it's Apple releasing it. I use the speakers on my phone all the time. I don't do critical listening with it, but I watch plenty of videos and listen to podcasts using the speakers. This would be a massive downgrade for me.
It's not about defending Apple. It is about acknowledging that what the Air offers will work just fine for many, many people, just like you acknowledge that it wouldn't work fine for you.

What you are doing is dumping on Apple for selling a $1,000 phone with a speaker you wouldn't like. The Air isn't for everyone but, like I said, a difference in need is not the same thing as defending Apple no matter what.
 
It's not about defending Apple. It is about acknowledging that what the Air offers will work just fine for many, many people, just like you acknowledge that it wouldn't work fine for you.

What you are doing is dumping on Apple for selling a $1,000 phone with a speaker you wouldn't like. The Air isn;t for everyone but, like I said, a difference in need is not the same thing as defending Apple no matter what.
This. The Air is not for everyone. It's just odd how much attention it's getting from the people who aren't its target audience.

Just enjoy your Pro? I don't understand it.
 
So…

users who listen to a lot of content on their iPhone without headphones may not be satisfied with it, and they should consider another model.

Users who mainly listen to their content with headphones and almost never through the iPhone’s built-in speaker can ignore this compromise.
 
IMG_2063.jpeg


This is the $10 solution, of course if you can buy AirPods but that will put your total cost to iPhone Pro’s prices.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: decypher44
I’d question what anyone over the age of 17 is even doing playing music from their internal phone speaker quite frankly, especially when Bluetooth speakers and earbuds can be cheap as chips. I use a £30 set of CMF buds which sound brilliant.
 

  • The iPhone Air has a single speaker, located in the earpiece at the top of the device. There isn’t a speaker on the bottom like there is on other iPhone models. This was noticeable right away to me. If you regularly listen to podcasts or music using just your iPhone speakers (especially in the shower), you’ll want to invest in a Bluetooth speaker.

It's a no buy from me

You regularly listen to music using your iPhone speakers AND you care about sound quality?
Amazing!
 
Sort of hilariously predictable.

If Samsung released a garbage speaker it'd be a field day around here.

When Apple does it ... "I don't really mind a crap mono speaker in the earpiece!"

lmfao

Can't make this stuff up.
The double standard with deference to whatever Apple does is really rather hilarious.
How is it a garbage speaker? Im assuming its the same speaker as in the other phones, only there is one instead of two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
Maybe because Apple wanted a thinner phone than Samsung.
I think you are right. And they needed as much space as possible for the battery, which was probably their top priority. If this phone ever becomes a fold, you need tablet size battery power for that huge screen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
Yeah whatever matey.
He's the only one who found that. Possible he got a bum one, or was doing it when loading everything in the background, or probably more likely he's doing a specific test that is particularly poorly suited for the Air. But I watched and read a bunch of reviews today and he's the only one who came to that conclusion, and in fact I saw multiple others that directly contradict his findings. So I'm inclined to believe it's not representative.

But many people will have them in our hands in approximately 48 hours, and then it'll be plain for all to see. There's not really any point in arguing about it.
 
I ordered one. Probably will end up returning (because of cameras, not speaker) but I wanted to try it out for myself.

Things can be true at the same time: the speaker is a compromise that is unacceptable to a lot of people AND a lot of people rarely use the speakers on their phone.

Apple has more data on use of speakers, headphones etc., than we do, and it very well may be that for Apple's expected customer for the Air, given a trade off between "space for more battery" and "better speakers" more space for battery makes the most sense.

I for one, only ever use the speakers on my phone during FaceTime calls where my wife or my son join me on the call. Otherwise, my phone makes no noise. No ringing, no music, no videos. If I want to do that, my AirPods are in. I'd take a Pro Max with just one speaker if it meant I got more battery life, and so I'd definitely prefer an Air with an already smaller battery lose the extra speaker.

That doesn't mean those who think that one speaker is unacceptable are wrong, just that we care about different things.
 
Battery life is a none issue as previously said it would be by many. It’s level with the base iPhone 17 and within 10% of the 17 Pro after some 10 hour videos etc.

Also the base iPhone 17 got hotter than the Air after a while.

Battery & thermals not a big issue unless your playing heavy games for prolonged periods.

View attachment 2550604
View attachment 2550603
Just as a note, the case getting hotter doesn't necessarily mean that the chip gets hotter. It could be that the 17 is just better at conducting the heat to the exterior. It wouldn't surprise me given that they moved components into the camera bump in the Air (so they are more concentrated at the top of the phone), while the 17 probably has a more conventional layout. MKBHD had Geekbench results in his first look video, and the 17 had a higher multi-core CPU score than the Air (by about 5%), so that would support the theory that the Air may throttle a bit more.
 
Homepod has 6 speakers though
But so close together one can hardly call that stereo.

I admit that I would have gladly traded 1 mm of thickness for a second speaker. But Apple decided not to and I pretty sure I'm gonna buy the Air over the regular 17 anyway.

Much prefer the weight vs screensize ratio and the confidence I have using it without a case.
 
For me, (someone getting the air who had no intention of upgrading this year whatsoever), my biggest worry is the phone after if it isn’t just as light and thin.
If my next goes back to a pro after years of being used to a thin air, it will feel like a brick!
 
Well, according to this review, after a 20 minutes graphic intensive testing, the A19 Pro on the iPhone Air is worse than the A19, and that's after a couple of tests, one of them inside a fridge to keep the Air as cool as possible:


Sounds to me like the A19 Pro version used in the Air is powered down to assist with battery life or something?. Definitely gimmicky.
I am honestly impressed if it took 20 mins of graphic Intensive testing to throttle air. There are many laptops that throttle well below that mark.
 
Lot of iPhone air hate is for folks who want to talk themselves out of impulse FOMO buying. It’s pretty common on this site over the years after a new product launch. And 2-3 months later there will be few complaining about Air bought out of FOMO.
I will probably not buy an air anytime soon, unless it is close to Pro Max , but I don’t get the hate. There are many who would love air.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
Imagine if Samsung posters told others to use earbuds as a solution to everything.

We’re seeing classic psyc defensive mechanisms like “it doesn’t matter anyway” (minimization) to “you shouldn’t use speakers anyway” (justification and superiority). They’ve taken the whole Steve Jobs thing about holding it wrong to whole another level.

some of it is defensive and people being sick of being told what they should or shouldn’t be prioritising in a device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joseph C
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.