'The Beat Goes On' Rumor Roundup

[milo]

Oh and I wouldn't be surprised if they upgraded to Leopard underpinnings tomorrow.

Absolutely, iPhone is running on a version of Leopard already. Not that the user can even tell though.

 

[penter]

is this really it?!?!?!?

i can't believe it, i think im gonna cry. after having waited SO LONG since my black and white 3G ipod broke, its finally here!!!!

is anyone here as happy as i am??

I have NO complaints, on my end ill be happy with whatever features it has. for those of you that are wondering abut the price, well..... DONT. this will be bigger and better than any ipod before, and i dont think there should even be argument on any matter whatsoever.

 

[pcorajr]

Wonder is these new iPods will be available the same day as with the iMacs?

If these new iPods are iPhonr - phone capability and under 400 I will be all over them. Currently i carry a PSP with a 2gb memory stick in it so I dont have much space but it would be nice to have a iPhone like iPod with at least 60 GB of space and wireless so I can replace my PSP.

 

[destroyboredom]

My take

Here's my opinion on the iPod touch tomm. I agree that it will have wi-fi but with limited capability. But I don't think it will be limited to just ITMS. I see Apple going the direction of widgets to add additional features and at the same time not including a full featured browser. Think about it, youtube, stock quotes, quicktime trailers, etc..

I would think there also has to be more since they are having it at Moscone...what? I have no idea. Seems odd to book Moscone for an iPod update...granted its a huge update but still.

 

[wolfpackfan]

You know I don't seem to be reading much about the new Nanos. Am I the only one excited about them? At first, I wasn't real excited with the early renderings, but the latest photos looked really neat IMO. Right now I have a 30GB 5.5G but am thinking about "downgrading" to the new Nano. I used to have a Nano and really miss the smaller size. I got the 5.5G thinking I'd watch a lot of videos on it, but find I really don't watch many on it at all. I find I use my laptop to watch videos more than the iPod. I can't see myself getting the new iPod Touch. It will be just too expensive.

 

[shrimpdesign]

Blurrier? No. The pixels are just bigger. But so is the picture. And isn't video a major part of these units?

As I said before, what about TV? Do you consider a bigger screen at the same resolution *not* to be better? This seems like fanboy spin to me, it just seems bizarre to try and spin a smaller screen as an advantage.

While all true, slightly bigger is still an advantage. And somewhat moot points since I don't believe anyone here ever claimed that the zune was higher resolution or widescreen.

I just posted the article because "zedsdead" was making a big deal out of the "worse" iPod screen. The Zune's screen, at best, is slightly better than the iPod's. There's a lot of common misconception about the Zune's screen, I was just trying to clear it up for anyone, not just you or Padraig.

 

[Project]

I just asked the dude at the Genius Bar if they had taken delivery of the new iPods into the store yet. He said "I have no idea what you are talking about..", with a wry smile on his face - seems even the retail staff keep their mouths shut when it comes to keeping secrets. Steve got them well trained, lol.

 

[GregA]

Actually.. all I WANT is an iPod Nano 8GB with Video, plus a TV dock so I can dock it to the TV and use it like an AppleTV (including wireless syncing to my Mac).

Too much to ask?
Probably.

AppleTV (software update? price drop? new media server?)

I just realised they could also release an AppleTV which works on older TVs. That'd be useful.
(Or a version without a hard disk - though I find that unlikely)

 

[nicksan]

My guesses...

iPod Touch - Same style as iPhone, but with size of 5G. Touch screen, Coverflow etc. 60GB/120GB, with some flash memory used as a buffer to reduce HDD usage. No wi-fi (bar maybe iTunes Store access).

iPod Nano - The stumpy one from the leaked photos. 8GB/16GB. Sort of a cross between 5G iPod, and the last Nano. Music and video for the person with style in mind.

Shuffle - Upgraded capacities.

 

[slabwax]

Quote:

you are so freaking wrong,
i know many people that are pissed at the idea that the new ipod may have very similar functions as the iphone. why spend 600 on a phone with an ipod, when you can spend 300 on an ipod and get a phone for free on whatever carrier you want. Personally i think a new jacked up ipod will be a slap in the face to all current iphone owners, THANKS IN ADVANCE CRAPPLE!!!!!!

Why does one product cancels out the other? If Apple sells the new high end Ipod for very close to the same price as the Iphone It will not eat into the sales of the iphone. AT&T exclusive for five years cuts in to the sales of the Iphone. Even if they put safari in the new ipod with wifi only features in it . It's not at all like a cell phone. No microphone,no ear piece. (I guess you could use your headphones). no sim, no esn = no Iphone. I would never buy a ipod with less than 80gig hdd in it today. Some of us want lots of space. You might not agree. But it is true. Some people will never fill 4 gigs of I phone. Why would they buy a 100 gig Ipod. Does anyone else get it It is two completely different products for two completely different consumers. But most people email and go online so everyone wants that. Now none of us have any idea what apple will do in the morning.
People will spend stupid money on anything if they feel it is what they need/want.

I'm done now
Dean

 

[milo]

I just posted the article because "zedsdead" was making a big deal out of the "worse" iPod screen. The Zune's screen, at best, is slightly better than the iPod's. There's a lot of common misconception about the Zune's screen, I was just trying to clear it up for anyone, not just you or Padraig.

This was all I saw, did I miss something?

"they CANNOT keep the a screen that is worse than the Zune on their best iPod"

I wouldn't call that making a big deal, it's just stating the situation. And yes, the screen on the zune is better. Nobody here said it's a higher resolution, nobody here said it's widescreen. But it is bigger, and that's an advantage. I still don't see any "misconception" in what zed said.

 

[zedsdead]

I just posted the article because "zedsdead" was making a big deal out of the "worse" iPod screen. The Zune's screen, at best, is slightly better than the iPod's. There's a lot of common misconception about the Zune's screen, I was just trying to clear it up for anyone, not just you or Padraig.

I was not making a big deal out of it....but the fact is that the screen is slightly better...now...the 5g iPod screen cannot hold a candle to the iPhone(i know, b/c I have both...I have no doubt we will see a widescreen iPod tomorrow.

 

[Rhosfelt]

The thing about the wifi/safari/you tube debate is, would it really be called an iPod if it has access to the internet via any means?

Not throwing stones or anything, (and as we all heard probably a million times) but the iPhone says three devices (phone, iPod, revolutionary internet device).

All i know is I have a 60GB video that is pretty beat up, and if they have a touch screen iPod tomorrow I will pull out the credit card and spend away. (I have about 440 saved up )

 

[newguineafan]

you are so freaking wrong,
i know many people that are pissed at the idea that the new ipod may have very similar functions as the iphone. why spend 600 on a phone with an ipod, when you can spend 300 on an ipod and get a phone for free on whatever carrier you want. Personally i think a new jacked up ipod will be a slap in the face to all current iphone owners, THANKS IN ADVANCE CRAPPLE!!!!!!

I've said this before on the other thread, and I'll happily say it again:


Wow buddy, calm down. I hope your mom dosen't put the wrong lunch meat on your sandwich; you would kill her!!

First off, this is an Apple Rumors Site, not a soundingboard for your warped and malicious opinions. Second of all, no, I wasn't wrong, I tried to create a thoughtful analysis of what might happen on Wednesday. You, on the other hand, spewed hate. Just because you are jealous of the soon-to-be new iPod doesn't mean you have to take it all out on us.

I may be wrong, but at least I tried to use my best judgement. Do us all a favor, and please refrain from unruly conduct next time you post. The forum rules might help you a bit. Hey, it may even become your Bible.

Update:
By the way, I read your previous edits, and they're all attacks on other users. You better stop or someone can and will report you for abuse.

 

[izzle22]

The thing about the wifi/safari/you tube debate is, would it really be called an iPod if it has access to the internet via any means?

Not throwing stones or anything, (and as we all heard probably a million times) but the iPhone says three devices (phone, iPod, revolutionary internet device).

I'm with you. As much as I want this new iPod to have wifi/safari I really don't think it will. Maybe the next version but not this one. I've still got my fingers crossed.

 

[unclewinkie]

the new ipods will not be very good. At&t pays $200 for every iphone that apple makes. so if apple would of made their own network they would have charged $800, but at&t is not helping pay for the ipod it will cost more or the same as the iphone. plus the iphone has only 8 gigs of memory. So the new ipods will not be touch screen or any thing like the iphone.

 

[Loge]

May have been mentioned in one of the countless posts on this event, but the Guardian is reporting that the whole thing is being streamed live to BBC Television Centre in the UK - suggesting an expansion in BBC content on iTunes to go with the new widescreen iPod? Would be amazing to have 7 day catch up syncing straight to the new one....

Then again, could be nothing! Link

Another article falling for the all-flash nonsense.

Though they've been patchy lately, I'm with Thinksecret on this one.

 

[bluedevil14]

im just hoping for custom ringtones for the iphone.

maybe will see some other iPhone-related announcements such as a IM client?

 

[cammo427]

If they add wifi lets hope they allow it to be used for downloading music etc. The inability to use the Zune's wifi except to communicate with another Zune has proven to me Microsoft is clueless as far as user needs and wants are concerned.

Are you kidding me? I don't see much use for a wireless iTMS.

Does anyone think it'll have a camera? Or is that too far out there?

That would be nice. I can see it now... Apple and Canon join forces and release a iPod Powershot. Wouldn't that be nice... I don't see it happening though.

Anyone else think that - after seeing the announcement that this is being held at Moscone - this might turn out to be *just* a "Beatles Available on iTunes!!!" announcement and nothing more...?

I can see it now: Paul and Ringo there, a live performance, tons of media, a whole section of the iTMS devoted to the band, a slew of new print and television ads, etc.

Of course, I'm not expecting this... but I think it's a lot more likely than I did, say, last night...

That would be so depressing. I love The Beatles but seriously, I already have their cd's ripped to my iTunes.

YouTube will be put on the iPod, just like the iPhone.

I really do see this happening. Good call.

I just asked the dude at the Genius Bar if they had taken delivery of the new iPods into the store yet. He said "I have no idea what you are talking about..", with a wry smile on his face - seems even the retail staff keep their mouths shut when it comes to keeping secrets. Steve got them well trained, lol.

LOL! I do this all the time on the live chat. I am a terrible person.

As the day comes to an end, I am going to put in my final predictions...

iPod nano offered in 4 gigs for $149, 8 gigs for $199, and 16 gigs for $249. video capabilities and offered in Silver, Red, Blue, Green, Pink, and Orange.

Shuffle 1 gig for $79 and 2 gigs for $99 offered in same colors plus product red only in 2 gig version.

iPod touch 60 gig for $399 and 120 gig for $499. Features will include wifi with iTMS and YouTube apps with a Safari and Mail app in a later update. There will not be a digital radio feature. It's not like Apple.

AppleTV probably won't have an update.

iPodHifi will have an update that includes airtunes. Apple won't give up on iPodHifi... At least not yet. They should have a long time ago. It would be cool if this were in the 6 said colors. And was only 149. It would sell then. Oh, and it needs some kind of a cool clock and s-video. I might get one for my dorm room then.

Until then, I am not even going to get on this website. I have already exceeded my bandwidth for the week (curse you Bit Torrent) so my internet is slower than ever. I think I will just go to bed now and sleep for 13 hours. Go to class, and sit down and gawk at the new toys.

 

[nemaslov]

is this really it?!?!?!?

i can't believe it, i think im gonna cry. after having waited SO LONG since my black and white 3G ipod broke, its finally here!!!!

is anyone here as happy as i am??

I have NO complaints, on my end ill be happy with whatever features it has. for those of you that are wondering abut the price, well..... DONT. this will be bigger and better than any ipod before, and i dont think there should even be argument on any matter whatsoever.

I will only argue if at least ONE version is smaller than 120GB (160 would be even better). I NEED ALL MY MUSIC WITH ME!!!

 

[madmaxmedia]

The thing about the wifi/safari/you tube debate is, would it really be called an iPod if it has access to the internet via any means?

Not throwing stones or anything, (and as we all heard probably a million times) but the iPhone says three devices (phone, iPod, revolutionary internet device).

All i know is I have a 60GB video that is pretty beat up, and if they have a touch screen iPod tomorrow I will pull out the credit card and spend away. (I have about 440 saved up )

1. The name 'iPod' was chosen partly because it does not specifically refer to music, so other functions could be added. Unfortunately they didn't do the same for iTunes, which you use for purchasing movies. (not a big deal of course.)

2. The iPod already does stuff other than play music. It's inevitable that functionality will expand with new versions.

I'm not saying wifi/safari/iChat/etc. is coming tomorrow, but it will eventually come.

 

[madmaxmedia]

Do you have a source on that? Most analysts think Apple is getting a kickback on suscriber fee, but not on the hardware sale.

the new ipods will not be very good. At&t pays $200 for every iphone that apple makes. so if apple would of made their own network they would have charged $800, but at&t is not helping pay for the ipod it will cost more or the same as the iphone. plus the iphone has only 8 gigs of memory. So the new ipods will not be touch screen or any thing like the iphone.

 

[nemaslov]

Originally Posted by Unspeaked
Anyone else think that - after seeing the announcement that this is being held at Moscone - this might turn out to be *just* a "Beatles Available on iTunes!!!" announcement and nothing more...?

I can see it now: Paul and Ringo there, a live performance, tons of media, a whole section of the iTMS devoted to the band, a slew of new print and television ads, etc.



Of course, I'm not expecting this... but I think it's a lot more likely than I did, say, last night...

Well the Beatles did play their last ever official concert In San Francisco (aside from the Let it Be Apple rooftop filming on Saville Row). That would be a nice...encore...41 years later...

 

[ABM]

Only a bit more than 17.5 hours to wait...

 

[madmaxmedia]

LOL, the Beatles appear, and then get booed off stage when it's apparent no wifi phoneless iPod is coming!! WTF!!!!


No, it's not going to just be a Beatles announcement. Why would Apple have totally cleared distribution channels of existing iPods?

Originally Posted by Unspeaked
Anyone else think that - after seeing the announcement that this is being held at Moscone - this might turn out to be *just* a "Beatles Available on iTunes!!!" announcement and nothing more...?

I can see it now: Paul and Ringo there, a live performance, tons of media, a whole section of the iTMS devoted to the band, a slew of new print and television ads, etc.



Of course, I'm not expecting this... but I think it's a lot more likely than I did, say, last night...

Well the Beatles did play their last ever official concert In San Francisco (aside from the Let it Be Apple rooftop filming on Saville Row). That would be a nice...encore...41 years later...