Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I just don't get why there's so much negativity about this???

It's nothing super WOW but it's cool. Just because they didn't give a new technology piece of candy doesn't mean Apple is horrible. Only people on this site and other Apple rumor sites tried to read more into it than there was.

I don't get it.... seems some people are never happy unless they're getting the socks knocked off by something ultra-cool.
 
Personally, I don't like the Beatles, but that doesn't stop me seeing that this is huge news for Apple: This is the first time the Beatles' music has been (legally) available electronically and is a massive coup for the iTunes store.
People who say the Beatles are irrelevant are dead wrong (at least in the UK), and this "non-event" (as it has been tagged by people here) was about the only bit of news apart from the Royal Engagement that made it onto 5 Live tonight

It's also made it onto the BBC New front page - it is definitely newsworthy and I don't see how a 24 hour teaser was out of proportion
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2010-11-16 at 18.23.04.png
    Screen shot 2010-11-16 at 18.23.04.png
    318.2 KB · Views: 41
Last edited:
I made this point a few pages ago and it really needs reinforcing to people.

LOL, 650 is nothing. These negative morons here think they are gonna bring down Apple by posting negative stuff. Wait until the sales figures are put out about the Beatles. There will be millions of iTunes downloads for the Beatles collection vs. the lame 650 negative comments. Let them keep crying. :D

I have the sense that a lot of the commentators are younger or don't realize what went into this venture (or their imaginations ran wild of an amazing Mac that operates through telepathically or some revolutionary product lol). I'm 34, so I wasn't part of the Beatles generation, however I do like some of their albums and I can appreciate the historical impact The Beatles had on society. In the end, this is a big deal, not only for Beatles fans but also the business Apple will receive (as well as the surviving members of the group).
 
The prices seem pretty ridiculous as usual with iTunes content. Amazon has far better prices for the physical product. And in my state, iTunes charges sales tax whereas Amazon doesn't. Unless a person wants to buy individual songs, they're getting ripped off on the box set and albums if they buy them through iTunes.
 
The Beatles aren't my type of music. I would rather see AC/DC make the iTunes catalog. That's the kind of rock music I listen to!

It would be nice to see as much music available from as many artists as possible. It doesn't even matter if I like the artists or not, the more the merrier is what I say. :)
 
I would tend to disagree; I feel that my point was rather concise. That said, using an economic example like that with such variance present was probably not a good choice for comparison, in fact an economic model in general isn't good for the argument at hand. That said though, the mere presence of higher-grade consumer and professional hardware (albeit some is overhyped) should be indication enough that there is a difference between the two. We don't seem to disagree on this-- I think the point really comes down to what hardware it's used on, as you seem to blanket coat your assumptions towards any hardware and any person.

As per the ABX test... it's inherently flawed. Let's go for a simple hypothesis test. Your sample used for that is not random, and certainly isn't indicative of the overall population. Furthermore hardware differences and media choice skew the results entirely-- you could say they're confounding variables. There's too many variances present even in the source material (ex original quality differences, times re-encoded, encoded with what, etc)... how can you draw a conclusion about the population from that? Find me a definitive study from a random sample with all of the confounding variables controlled; then we'll talk. Doing a living-room test with friends has no statistical significance-- the results mean nothing.

For example, while re-encoding my library, I did an informal ABX test with my friends that wasn't double blind and guess what; they all said that the lossless sounded better, and I agree. This was on lower end audio equipment (DAC 707 + Klipsch Promedia 2.1). Does it mean anything statistically? No. Much like you I have no true statistical evidence to base my opinions on, only anecdotal and/or flawed studies. My evidence and experience suggests the opposite of yours, so who is right? Technically no one, however if we were to bank on anecdotal evidence alone then probably myself.

Unless you have concrete proof that applies to the population its he said she said, with me saying that I CAN hear the difference on non-audiophile grade equipment.

Wrong on all accounts

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=16295 <<<< What a proper ABX test is.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYTlN6wjcvQ <<< Audio Myths Workshop.

Have a read/watch conduct some tests yourself then see how wrong you are.
 
Oh I know why Apple did that. Becuase they have to have SOMETHING on their homepage, and the MBA splash screen was getting outdated... Now they will milk this goat until 22nd of February when the new 13" MBP comes out :p
 
Delighted

For all you naysayers out there, not everyone who likes the Beatles already has their music, myself included, and I am delighted with this announcement. Bought the box set and it is amazing 'Bout time.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)

Agreed...this whole thing is a let down. I already have the beatles music I like... I will forget this by the end of the day...now a subscription or cloud service I wouldn't forget...
 
:( Hmmmm ... dissapointed!!! What can I say?... stunts like this from Apple takes away the magic and the hype for me ... all that's left is a greedy Apple that want's to abuse our expectations. :(
 
The Beatles on iTunes??? WHO CARES????? Anyone who enjoys them, probably already ripped all their music onto their computer by now. Stop trying to deflect attention for the late release of IOS 4.2! WASTE OF TIME!
 
people don't understand; Steve loves them and he will never forget this day, and he doesn't care that you are not interested ;)
 
All I can say is that for all the sad people that are complaining, get a grip. Want iTunes streaming or whatever - have you not heard of Spotify?

Thinking about it I don't know what you were complaining about. The teaser was a play on words.

It's your own fault to get yourself hyped up so much. :D
 
We should preserve this entire thread as a perfect example of the way society has descended into a whiny, expectation-filled, me-first bunch of cry babies.
 
Let's just run the post count on this thread sky high since this is the silliest topic to be discussing and debating over. UGH

Oh wait... what the heck am I doing here then?
 
The prices seem pretty ridiculous as usual with iTunes content. Amazon has far better prices for the physical product. And in my state, iTunes charges sales tax whereas Amazon doesn't. Unless a person wants to buy individual songs, they're getting ripped off on the box set and albums if they buy them through iTunes.

Can you get the downloads from Amazon ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.