Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'd actually go on to say that they were the first rock group rather than first boy band. Boy bands don't tend to write their own songs and play instruments, they tend to just have good singing voices, have their songs penned for them and dance around on stage because they have to fill the void left by the instruments.
 
More importantly, Is Paul McCartney Real Or What? Has Paul McCartney been cloned, or replaced after an accident in the mid-60's? Perhaps his double was created on the Infinite Loop!
 
Oh please...

Apple's ability to turn the most mundane into "news" that's "exciting" never ends :eek:

This isn't just apple news.. streaming on other platforms as well.

Does anyone know if Paul Mcartney music will stream as well?
 
It all began with, Lisztomania
Liszt_18583-148x300.jpg


....
In the mid-19th century, Liszt was tearing up the polite salons and concert halls of Europe with his virtuoso performances. Women would literally attack him: tear bits of his clothing, fight over broken piano strings and locks of his shoulder-length hair. Europe had never seen anything like it. It was a phenomenon the great German poet Heinrich Heine dubbed "Lisztomania."

"We hear about women throwing their clothes onto the stage and taking his cigar butts and placing them in their cleavages," says Stephen Hough, a world-renowned concert pianist....
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/22/141617637/how-franz-liszt-became-the-worlds-first-rock-star
 
So many hot takes on the Beatles ITT.

I finally realized I have made a mistake enjoying their music for 20+ years now, but I will rectify it by listening to more influential and talented groups/artists such as Iron Maiden, Damon Albarn, and the RHCP. o_O
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirCheese
So many hot takes on the Beatles ITT.

I finally realized I have made a mistake enjoying their music for 20+ years now, but I will rectify it by listening to more influential and talented groups/artists such as Iron Maiden, Damon Albarn, and the RHCP. o_O

It's okay, once the ignorant people in this thread finally go back to what they think is more influential than the Beatles, perhaps they will finally realize virtually everything they listen to had somewhat of an influence from them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alvindarkness
The Beatles were talented, creative musicians but I don't see them as being super influential.

I think as artists the Beatles peaked with Revolver, tossing Mr Roberts, which sounded like an earlier session outtake and including For Know One from the Peppers album which was obviously recorded during the Revolver sessions. This was pop/rock realism with a happy tune, Yellow Submarine, tosses in for a little diversion and ending with probably one of rock's greatest accidental masterpieces, Tomorrow Never Knows. I also think Day In The Life was a subliminal hold over from Revolver. This album will always stand as their best work. One cannot talk about the Beatles without mentioning the huge contribution by George Martin. Without George Martin the Beatles floundered.

There were more influential musicians in pop/rock than the Beatles.

1. Don Van Vliet.
2. The Ramones
3. The Velvet Undergtround
4. Elvis Presley(Sun Records)
5. Buddy Holly
6. And many more.....

The Beatles had their moment and brought joy to many. They do deserve a certain amount of respect from all in music no matter one's tastes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stu.h and JDuggan
I love the Beatles.
I was over in Manhattan for my 40th last week and had to visit Central Park, Strawberry Fields on the anniversary of his death. What a sombre tone, yet people were paying their respects (as they do every day). People playing beatles music, even went to the location where JL was shot

3EF70A2B-89CA-404A-A4A9-86EC5FBC68EF_zpsyleujspp.jpg
 
Last edited:
I have always wondered.

Why should anyone give them 1 cent now to listen to this stuff?

Crazy world where someone can work 40. 50 years ago and still get paid 50+ years later for that bit of work.

How about we pay a tool maker for every time we use their tool over the next 100 years?
Oh dam, another nail I've had to bang in with this Hammer the Beatles made in their factory 50 years ago, better pay them 1 cent again.
so anything that was created a long time ago should be free?
 
Don't worry, majority of people who claim to be audiophiles will not know the difference. If you can afford reference grade headphones, and the right dac/amp, yeah bad recording come out....]

For most with apple buds.....HD music or a bad rip sounds about the same ;)
I'm hardly an audiophile but 128kbps still sounds like garbage. 256 AAC and better is good for me.
 
lol ok. why is that?

I believe that copyright is not a natural property right. You cannot own what someone else has in their head. Once you express music, it will be beyond your control and can be a source of inspiration and enjoyments for others. The only thing that prevents people from just making copies of the same work is the law itself. With digitalised music, it's literally just bits that make up a work. Compare this to a painting, you can make a copy of a painting, but it will never be the original work. You can hold on to a painting forever, just as you can hold on to a vinyl, but you can never control the music itself.

To some extent that is reasonable, to protect and nurture the artistry, but for works that were made in the 60s, there should be no one who owns the rights anymore, especially with something as culturally important as Beatles' songs. Copyright nowadays extends to 70 years after death of the artist. This is beyond ludicrous and does not promote the artistry as such. In fact, copyright is doing a disserve at this point when it prevents people from getting access to music that society at large benefitted from, especially considering that a lot of wealth has been generated for the artists already.

Did you know that you can download lots of ebooks at Apple iBooks that are now in the public domain? Important books of science and philosophy and lots of classic fiction. I really like the concept of public domain and it is so underused in digital media. Think of all the media that you will never see again, because copyright owners do not make it available. Should society not a have right to those works after a while?
 
This is gonna be a "stocking stuff-er" "all i want for xmas is a subscription to listen to The Beatles."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.