So anyone seen it yet? Work was utterly dead today and a friend who lives in the burbs was in the same predicament (wanted to see it, no one to go with), so I left early, hopped on the Metra to the burbs and saw it with her at 5:20.
I always try to keep expectations low for movie adaptations of books due to the limitations and translation between genres. However, I really think The Hunger Games fails where the Harry Potter series imo did not - preserving the feeling of the books in the movie. You may argue that significant scenes were cut or condensed in any of the 8 HP movies, but I would argue that you felt like you were still in the place you were mentally when you read the corresponding book.
Some more detailed/potential spoilerish stuff, so highlight (don't want to ruin it for anyone): Like the stuff with the games itself. I know there's a need to keep the movie PG-13, but it's a major hit and major movies get insane leeway - especially when language or homosexual sex isn't involved. Not even looking for gore, but actual action and suspense. I mean any "battle scene" is just shaking camera spazzing to hide the fact that not much is going on. And those moments were incredibly brief. Add to the fact that the danger expressed in the games is really summed up in (a) beginning (b) fire (c) careers underneath the tree (d) retrieving medicine and (e) ending. Each scene just seconds really, besides the careers part.
I dunno. It just really didn't impress. The few negative reviews I read seemed to hit it - it's solid acting by Katniss that tries to hold up a lackluster screenplay.