Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Interesting take. Asking a question is sexist? That‘s new. And obiously wrong

I don't know how "obviously wrong" the question is. It struck me the same way. Because you weren't simply asking a question. You asked a specific question related to how much her success is related to her appearance, which clearly sounds sexist.

You may not be a sexist person, and I'm not saying you are. But that question is pretty problematic.
 
Interesting take. Asking a question is sexist? That‘s new. And obiously wrong

Actually, your statement is sexist: coz it implies critizising a woman is prohibited ipso facto her being a woman
Would you have asked that question if she was a man?
 
You may not be a sexist person, and I'm not saying you are. But that question is pretty problematic.
I don‘t agree, apparently.

What I did was merely calling out the elephant in the room. I‘d find it problematic, though, if it were not allowed to discuss the matter
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menneisyys2
(her "interview" with Tim Cook comes readily to mind) and only pre-screened, softball questions are put forth is the very antithesis of integrity.
To interview those people there are per-screened questions. You don't get to do the interview unless you agree to it. He's not being subpoenaed in front of a court to be questioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
I respect what she does, but I do wish she would see the flaws and not think everything is amazing, even talking about the studio display she said I love that display and there isn't any issues, she just can't ever say one thing is bad, that's why she can't be trusted for reviews
Yeah it's not a channel for "reviews" per say, it's more of a lifestyle channel that looks at new apple gear. I don't think she presents herself as a serious or critical reviewer anyway. Hell I don't ever recall a video where she gives advice like "you should buy this" or "you should skip this."

Seems like there's hate towards her style of video, but a lot of it is trying to shoehorn her into something she doesn't seem to try to be.

Just enjoy it for what it is. Or not.
 
I don't know how "obviously wrong" the question is. It struck me the same way. Because you weren't simply asking a question. You asked a specific question related to how much her success is related to her appearance, which clearly sounds sexist.

You may not be a sexist person, and I'm not saying you are. But that question is pretty problematic.

Why is the question "problematic"?

Physical appearance is absolutely a part of success in visual fields, for both men and women.

If you're on video/film, your appearance is a component in your appeal.
It's not the only component, but it's a factor and acknowledging that or asking about it doesn't make anyone sexist, nor is it problematic to do so.

Society has got to relax on some of this.
If you can't even talk about things, we literally are permanently stuck on so many issues.
 
Last edited:
I like her reviews because she actually performs a complex task and shares the results. I can then have my own take aways. Her ability to do video editing on the M2 Air that she was not able to do on previous versions is quite revealing. There is no doubt this is a nice machine. Even though I am a basic user, I purchased the 14 inch MacBook Pro some months ago. I may have gotten one of these if it were available at that time given her demonstration.
 
I'll go to others for real reviews instead
That’s fine.

It has nothing to do with her positivity and everything to do with her integrity.
How does she lack integrity?

Based on the showcased video, as I have not seen/known of iJustine until now, she describes what she does, what she likes, and why. Are her conclusions entirely objective? Probably not. Nonetheless, it’s opinion (i.e. subjective). I didn’t hear/see her cluelessly spewing tech data, benchmarks, etc. In fact, she seemed to only address a few specs simply because she was asked. I also did not get any indication she was trying to compare/compete with the likes of GN, for example. In other words, I didn’t hear any outright lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ProfessionalFan
Long story short:
It’s better than the M1 and still targeted to the business commuter who needs a basic laptop. 🤦‍♂️
"It’s better than the M1" - the M2 CPU itelf may be, but the baseline config - well, not always :/
I think this is the key here. No one would say people are watching LTT because of his looks. I don't like it when people immediately say something is sexist or racist but some of the comments here really push the envelope.
Why would a 99% male (tech) audience look for something, say, a Schwarzenegger-like sixpack to watch? We males don't work that way... and as the tech audience is still predominantly male, sure they like watching/seeing pretty(ish) women/girls. That's pure biology. With the opposite case (tech audience would be predominantly female) sixpack Schwarzenegger-alikes would have a LOT more success than "ordinary" Average Joes. That's also pure biology. Both males and females are attracted by pretty females and strong, "sixpack" males.
 
  • Like
Reactions: russell_314
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.