Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We all know that Apple Fanboy who will pay that price with a smile, not bat an eye, because it is justified, because they have to have THAT monitor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
I loved how the audience collectively gasped when it was revealed not only that the stand was sold separately — but that it cost $999.

I don’t think that ever happened. It’s pretty sad when your own applause-machine starts to go nuclear on you. Someone definitely overplayed his hand here. I also wonder if Apple will adjust the volume a bit for that part of the video they just released.
 
Hey Apple, if you wanted $6k for the monitor then you should've just priced it at $6k rather than charging $5k and insulting our intelligence by charging an additional $1k for the stand nearly everyone will need anyway.

So true. The price is the price. I think we all knew it would be way up there. But just charge extra and include the stand.

Adding a stand to your cart for $1k, hahaha. I’d feel so stupid.
 
$299 or $399 even.

But not K. No, sir.

I’m sure it has an immense amount of industrial design and might even be a piece of modern art.

In any other context it might even be appropriate.

But a thousand dollars for a monitor stand sense such a terrible message.
 
Have you people never shopped for a counter-balanced display mount before? They're not cheap. We use Humanscale ones at work, and they're something like $400 each, and meh quality to be honest. The price of the Apple one is certainly high, but assuming it's actually very good and figuring in the Apple-tax, I don't actually think it's unreasonable.

Or, do people really plan on putting a $5000 display on a crappy plastic stand?
 
Have you people never shopped for a counter-balanced display mount before? They're not cheap. We use Humanscale ones at work, and they're something like $400 each, and meh quality to be honest. The price of the Apple one is certainly high, but assuming it's actually very good and figuring in the Apple-tax, I don't actually think it's unreasonable.

Or, do people really plan on putting a $5000 display on a crappy plastic stand?

Even so, to announce it as they did... man, that screenshot is going to make the rounds in the media. Such a terrible idea.
 
Have you people never shopped for a counter-balanced display mount before? They're not cheap. We use Humanscale ones at work, and they're something like $400 each, and meh quality to be honest. The price of the Apple one is certainly high, but assuming it's actually very good and figuring in the Apple-tax, I don't actually think it's unreasonable.

Or, do people really plan on putting a $5000 display on a crappy plastic stand?
No most people who purchased a 5k lcd display in 2019 expect the stand to come with it........but you are right its our fault......We are not spending enough.........
 
No most people who purchased a 5k lcd display in 2019 expect the stand to come with it........but you are right its our fault......We are not spending enough.........
Most people who purchased a 5k display in 2019 spent a lot less than $5,000. This 6k display here will be purchased by companies who won't use any cheap included stand anyway.

Would you have prefered they say the monitor costs $6000, but for $1000 less you can get it without the stand? Actually, from a marketing standpoint, that probably would have been smarter to do it that way.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.