No you didn't. I checked your posts. Nobody said:
'that if Apple implements these wishes the device will cease to be an iPad'
'basic functionality like attaching a file to an e-mail is unApple'
Nobody said anything comparable to this, not even paraphrased.
Actually, that's pretty much EXACTLY what they said.
How else do you interpret the statement...
The device you're laying out in your list is FUNDAMENTALLY different from what an iPad is.
Basic reading comprehension tells you that if a person repeatedly claims that the iPad does every single thing most people want it to do, they're claiming that the device is perfect.
It's hilarious reading all the contortions you've made in the past several posts. First you claim that someone posting...
"The iPad should have . . . X"
is somehow completely different from someone posting...
'I would like (an iPad) that does... X'
That somehow, the first statement is a demand of apple and only the latter statement qualifies as a wish.
Then this strawman...
People who are satisfied with the iPad shouldn't have bought it, they should have bought a basic cell phone (wtf)? The only people who should have bought the iPad are those who see it as lacking basic functionality? Or maybe nobody should have bought the first version, I dunno. This is even more lmao in light of your current post.
Read what the person I quoted actually wrote, or atleast quote me in context. My statement was a response to a poster claiming that most people don't do anything on their iPad beyond "get calls, send texts, and show off photos to the neighbors, that's it"
That's a ridiculous claim on it's face, (and not just the part about getting calls on it),
How could anyone honestly believe that iPad owners wouldn't ever like to do something like be able to upload a photo to facebook, or download a facebook photo and attach it to an email.