Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
i'm waiting.

i plan to future-proof my investment with a 17" i7 Badboy Pro.

I'm afraid you're going to be waiting a long time. Even if you buy a PC laptop right now, your choices are VERY limited. Apple will not release the i7 when they refresh the Macbook pro, they already have HEAT issues with the current Core 2 Duo processors due to the aluminum design of the case, and I highly doubt they will want to introduce additional heat and battery drain with the i7...
 
I paid 2099 $ (Canadian) for that thing. That includes free expedited shipping. So that's a pretty good price for something at least twice as more powerful as a top of the line MBP.

I paid $999 for mine, and it arrived within 24 hours (I live 20 miles from a UPS depot). So yes, you got twice as much power, but I paid half as much. Who's going to be more pissed when their laptop breaks/gets stolen/stops working?

(I forgot the USD/CAD exchange rate, but it's pretty much the same these days, isn't it?)
 
I'm afraid you're going to be waiting a long time. Even if you buy a PC laptop right now, your choices are VERY limited. Apple will not release the i7 when they refresh the Macbook pro, they already have HEAT issues with the current Core 2 Duo processors due to the aluminum design of the case, and I highly doubt they will want to introduce additional heat and battery drain with the i7...

I don't think its out of the realm of possibility for them to offer an i7 as an upgrade option. They're socket compatible with the i5 chips. I highly doubt the i7 will be the default option, but I don't see why they wouldn't offer it as an upgrade.

The i7 and the i5 chips are both 35W TDP.
 
I'm afraid you're going to be waiting a long time. Even if you buy a PC laptop right now, your choices are VERY limited. Apple will not release the i7 when they refresh the Macbook pro, they already have HEAT issues with the current Core 2 Duo processors due to the aluminum design of the case, and I highly doubt they will want to introduce additional heat and battery drain with the i7...

Heat would only be a problem if they used the i7 720QM(clarksdale) processor, which they almost certainly won't. It shouldn't be an issue if Apple uses the new "Arrandale" i7's and i5's. The downside is that the i7/i5's are only dual-core/four thread, not quad-core/eight thread like the i720QM.
They will still be fast as hell though.
 
This is the most ridiculous thought process behind not purchasing a more expensive/faster computer that I've ever heard.

Because its twice as much money? I think it could be more ridiculous. The guy who has the more powerful computer would be a lot more pissed off would he not? Who needs all that stress... haha
 
I don't think its out of the realm of possibility for them to offer an i7 as an upgrade option. They're socket compatible with the i5 chips. I highly doubt the i7 will be the default option, but I don't see why they wouldn't offer it as an upgrade.

The i7 and the i5 chips are both 35W TDP. The i7 chips are clocked lower and when Turbo Boost is activated they drop 2 cores, so theoretically their maximum power draw should be comparable with the i5s at max Turbo Boost.

Actually, of the Arrandale i7's, only the 620M is a 35w TDP. The other i7's are either 25w or 18w. Two of the three i5 models are 35w and the other is 18w. All of the i3 processors are 35w TDP.
 
hey
this druean (is that a name):confused: guy seems to have a good idea of what he's talking about here. If his BITE is as good as good as his talk, then im IN. what a dreamboat!!! :p
 
Actually, of the Arrandale i7's, only the 620M is a 35w TDP. The other i7's are either 25w or 18w. Two of the three i5 models are 35w and the other is 18w. All of the i3 processors are 35w TDP.

The lower TDP models are the low voltage / ULV models. Apple won't be using low voltage models and the ULV will only find its way into the Macbook Air.
 
Well the wait for ANY mac is killing me enough as is. There's a good chance I could get a MBP with my next check, and being my first Mac computer, you could just imagine the excitement. The current day specs will do me just fine in all honesty.
 
To put it simply, many of us, in-fact most of us do not need this significant upgrade in processor speed! The current model provides more than enough wack, even for top end software like logic pro which I can say runs smooth even on a 2GB RAM, 2.8Ghz core duo.
An update not only gives more performance for the same price, but the same performance for a lower price.
 
Something to fight the storm. For all those people who have enough of a life to go without the 20% cpu upgrade! But still have purchased one of the best laptops to date! The 'Current Macbook Pro' !

What does having a life have to do with anything?

Some people are waiting to upgrade because they don't want an 8 month old computer for an 8 month old price.

I think it is fine that you decided not to wait, but think it is unnecessary to claim those that made the choice to wait don't have a life just to justify the fact that you bought an 8 month old computer that is going to take a huge hit in value when Arrandale MBPs comes out soon.
 
The only reason I want to buy now is because I'm without a machine to watch pr0n on until it comes out.

I'm still holding out though. ;)
 
To put it simply, many of us, in-fact most of us do not need this significant upgrade in processor speed! The current model provides more than enough wack, even for top end software like logic pro which I can say runs smooth even on a 2GB RAM, 2.8Ghz core duo. Not only that, the new processor update may prove unstable and need perfecting, unlike the current. As for the money I benefit from student discount.

You might change your tune when GPU powered OpenCL/CUDA plug-ins become available. Then you will be begging for a better GPU with hundreds of cores! lol

Here are a couple of examples of what is available now...
http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_home.html#state=detailsOpen;aid=12d5c225-4df4-4315-b428-40025933ac3d

http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_home.html#state=detailsOpen;aid=d46f0040-0e15-11de-8c30-0800200c9a66
 
I paid $999 for mine, and it arrived within 24 hours (I live 20 miles from a UPS depot). So yes, you got twice as much power, but I paid half as much. Who's going to be more pissed when their laptop breaks/gets stolen/stops working?

(I forgot the USD/CAD exchange rate, but it's pretty much the same these days, isn't it?)

You paid 999 $ for a 13-inch Macbook. That's about 1100 $ CDN nowadays. You've got a good value (Mac wise). However, the 2000 $ Macbook Pro is not a good value at all. You don't get that much more power.
 
I paid 2099 $ (Canadian) for that thing. That includes free expedited shipping. So that's a pretty good price for something at least twice as more powerful as a top of the line MBP.

and by powerful you mean less battery life and more heat? I kind of doubt it has two times the performance of the 3.06GHz.. at least
 
I'm not waiting for arrendale or whatever else in pros at all)))
So I've got a great 13 inch macbook pro for my birthday which I had on the next day after the crappy iPad's introduction)
Arrandale or discret graphics or blueray or anything else does not bother me at all, maybe because I'm just a student who uses a laptop for internet, chats, office, music and all that stuff or because since I live not in US introduction of more powerful laptops would make them overpriced in my country, though I can't say that buying 13" Pro was a casual purchase for me)
I also like the name of the thread, I have to admit that since the 27th Jan keynote Macbook Pro's forums, as well as many others, became boring and full of only complaints about the damn update which didn't happened& The name of the thread sounds sarcastic and I like it)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.