I did my part as secondary devices. They are great in the pocket and easy to navigate on screen
I would have gone for a mini if I was younger, (I.e. read better eyesight), but as the years accumulate I find myself struggling with smaller screens and so prefer the better resolution over convenienc.
The iPhone 14 lineup is the first iPhone series to not include a display size below six inches, despite sticking with the 6.1-inch and 6.7-inch form factors of previous generations that included a 5.4-inch model. So why did Apple eliminate the "mini" device that some iPhone customers had come to love?
Apple debuted the iPhone 12 mini in 2020 following years of calls from iPhone fans for the company to offer a small-screen device with the latest features. When Apple did so, it was assumed that the small form factor would persist for several years – but it appears that the device has come to a premature end upon the release of the iPhone 14 lineup.
Concerns first arose when the iPhone 12 mini appeared to not be selling as well as Apple had hoped, making up just six percent of iPhone 12 sales in the U.S. in October and November 2020, according to data gathered by Consumer Intelligence Research Partners (CIRP). Counterpoint Research reported that the iPhone 12 mini accounted for only five percent of all iPhone 12 sales in the U.S. in the first half of January 2021.
Morgan Stanley believed that Apple chose to cut production of the iPhone 12 mini by two million units to create more manufacturing capacity for the more popular iPhone 12 Pro. This was mirrored by a Taiwanese report, citing supply chain sources, which said that strong demand for iPhone 12 Pro models in China led Apple to increase its supply of the more expensive devices.
Most strikingly, JP Morgan Chase claimed that Apple outright halted iPhone 12 mini production in the second quarter of 2021. While the sales reports for the iPhone 12 mini did not bode well for the iPhone 13 mini, Apple plans its iPhone production and supply chain operations well in advance of launch, meaning that the iPhone 13 mini was already well on the way to production by the time the issues with the iPhone 12 mini's sales were clear.
In April 2022, CIRP released more data suggesting that the iPhone 13 mini accounted for just 3 percent of iPhone 13 sales – half that of the iPhone 12 mini. These continued poor sales were likely the main reason behind the demise of the "mini" form factor iPhone.
With the iPhone 14 lineup, Apple has opted to replace the "mini" device with an all-new "Plus" device. In some respects, the iPhone 14 Plus mirrors the iPhone 12 mini, offering the latest iPhone's features in a different display size. Instead of offering a lightweight small-screen option, customers can now choose an even bigger battery and 6.7-inch display – the same size that iPhone "Max" customers have been used to for four years now at a price of $1,099 – but at a lower, $899 price point.
Article Link: There Is No iPhone 14 Mini: Here's Why
If only reachability was easy and dependable to use without an awkward unbalancing of the phone to swipe down on the bottom lip, or do a unreliable double or triple tap on the back of the phone.That’s what reachability is for.
Good luck! Hope it goes well.I didn’t even take the X’s curved edges and larger bezel into mind - trim those down and you get a bigger screen in a smaller/same size device. I’ll try my partner’s out and maybe I’ll like it. The X was just a little bit bigger than I wanted my phone to be, but I used it for three years, so I didn’t completely hate it.
Great companies do not exist solely to make money. Embedded in a great company is a deeper mission, with sustainability and growth being a means to an end. That's the sort of company Apple used to be.I don't agree with "cater" nor "consider". It's simply not a MORAL issue, period. Business exist to make money. If a product is not giving them the return on investment they desire, then they will reduce or cease production of that product. Pretty simple. Now, a charity, on the other hand, would be a different story.
Great companies do not exist solely to make money. Embedded in a great company is a deeper mission, with sustainability and growth being a means to an end. That's the sort of company Apple used to be.
Apple used to take a principled stance on only offering phones that could reasonably be operated with one hand, until Steve Jobs died. Now their position seems to be "we have no interest in offering a phone that can even uncomfortably be operated with one hand", which is not a position I agree with, and not a position the old Apple would have taken.And Apple's main mission is to provide the world with excellent technological tools to accomplish many different valuable tasks in many industries as well as for entertainment, which they have done and still are doing. That doesn't mean they have to be all things to all people. Not sure what else you want them to do here 🤷🏼♂️
Your thumb's range is circular, so increasing the width would make the far corners harder to reach.The mini has perfect length but it's just too narrow. Apple should increase its width while maintaining the length.
Apple used to take a principled stance on only offering phones that could reasonably be operated with one hand, until Steve Jobs died. Now their position seems to be "we have no interest in offering a phone that can even uncomfortably be operated with one hand", which is not a position I agree with, and not a position the old Apple would have taken.
I suppose he misestimated the general public's tastes from time to time.Didn't Steve Jobs also mock the idea of larger phones saying no one was going to buy them? LOL! That comment didn't age well. So I wouldn't be looking to Steve Job's words or thoughts as the gospel, though I know many here unfortunately do.
Me, and plenty of other people.And, seriously, who cares if you need two hands to use the phone?
I suppose he misestimated the general public's tastes from time to time.
Me, and plenty of other people.
Yes. It's slow and counter-intuitive compared to moving your thumb to where you'd like to tap.Are you familiar with the Reachability accessibility feature that I mentioned? Like I said, I don't care about having to use two hands, but I just went through a bunch of apps using that feature on my 13PM and there was literally nothing I couldn't do with one hand. Seems like a great compromise (just one little extra swipe) to have the "best of both worlds" if you're keen on using your iPhone with one hand.
People who use their phones as mobile devices.And, seriously, who cares if you need two hands to use the phone?
Yes. It's slow and counter-intuitive compared to moving your thumb to where you'd like to tap.
People who use their phones as mobile devices.
Wow, so if I'm holding my phone in one hand, it's a mobile device, but if I touch it with my other hand, it's no longer a mobile device? Fascinating! Never knew people lost the function of one hand when they're going mobile. /s
And as I've been explaining to iRockMan1, you can indeed use the larger phones one-handed if you want to.