I had the iPhone 7 and upgrading to the 13 mini was a great decision, now as they have reduced the price, you should really get the 13 mini, it is a great phone!I still have my iPhone 7. I may upgrade to the SE or 13 mini (I want dual-SIM while keeping a physical SIM). I use my phone to make phone calls. I don't have a data plan, I use my iPad for that.
Percentages are a narrow way to look at things. If you only care about percentages, that means that you're going to negatively impact large numbers, but small percentages, of people. If you're posting here, then presumably you're a power user who benefits from, at the very least, software features that are used only by small percentages of users. It would be a real shame if Apple started removing features like Services, Spaces, batch file renaming and the ability to disable Gatekeeper and SIP.Yes, the raw number it represents is large, but that raw number is very small in comparison to the raw number of total sales, thus why we use percentages (not raw numbers) to get the proper perspective.
Probably 10 times as much as the Watch "Editions" (so, around 1000?).Heh - those talking about numbers - how many of the Apple Watch Ultra's do you think they'll sell?![]()
I mean, I ran iOS 6 for ten years on an iPhone 5 until T-Mo cut off UMTS. If I have to stick with the 13 mini until 5G dies, I will.Keep up the good fight man! You and the 5 or 6 other people that love that miniature screen….
If the 3% figure was close, then there's no market for the Mini. "But if it was a PRO Mini!!!" - it probably wouldn't make much difference, even if it was technically feasible. People who truly want those features aren't going to prioritize the size. By definition, the most important thing to a person who really wants the features in the Pro is... the features. For the Mini customer, the most important thing is... the size.Screw all this cr*p about there being no market. We’ll never actually know if that’s the case or not, because Apple never gave the Pro crowd the option of buying a smaller device. The assumption that mini owners wouldn’t want better cameras or other premium features included in the Pro lineup means that Apple only tested the non-Pro crowd, who are more likely to be business users / slow upgraders.
There should have been a mini variant of the Pro. It’s that simple.
It’s high time Apple used their wizardry to go back to a dual-camera form factor to only include the ultra-wide and a telephoto lenses. They could definitely find ample middle ground between lenses using software at this point.
There is nothing contradictory. I am clearly stating that the iPhone Mini failed at those price points. I am of the belief that the iPhone Mini in 2022 is a niche device. At its current price point there was little demand. I believe it will sell much better at a cheaper price. The appeal of the device is its size. Make it less feature filled and it will sell well.All of this is contradictory. Do you want a full featured phone in a smaller package, or a budget phone made even more affordable because it's small?
One thing already failed. It no longer matters. You need to adapt to what needs to be done to make the iPhone Mini a viable option for consumers. And that is to offer it at a much cheaper price point.But then you'd lose sales from people disappointed that they "dumbed down" the phone to get it to that price point. Many people out there want to have their cake and to eat it too.
It’s actually a missed opportunity to not redesign the watch for us non health freaks…. Make it nerdy with great FaceTime , improved browsing, even a 4 megapixel side cam…. They must be terrified such a device might make many people abandon carrying a phone. I don’t see any technical hurdles and yeah I would pay big bucks for it if it meant giving up my phoneHeh - those talking about numbers - how many of the Apple Watch Ultra's do you think they'll sell?![]()
But what's most important to you - size or features? And even if you say "... a half inch thick, I would have bought it..." - Apple isn't making devices for you. They know that most people will not buy that, so they're not doing it.If they had made a Mini Pro and made it thicker for battery life, or heck - a half inch thick, I would have bought it in an INSTANT. I want the cameras, I want the battery life, and I want a small phone.
I agree I wish it was a Pro model but Portability is a feature too. It’s an objectively superior phone than the Pro because the Pro is a tablet. It’s like carrying a brick phone from the 90’sGive me an iPhone Pro Mini with the same camera in the 14 pro and I'll be THE FIRST pre-ordering.
Make it small and premium and people will buy it. I'm not intersted in a small budget phone. I know more than a handful of people that are waiting for a truly great small phone. Not a budget device.
I don't think the price is an issue. Further, lowering the price removes sales margin and thus an incentive to create it in the first place.One thing already failed. It no longer matters. You need to adapt to what needs to be done to make the iPhone Mini a viable option for consumers. And that is to offer it at a much cheaper price point.
Absolutely not. The appeal of the Mini is the size. It didn’t fail because it lacked anything. It failed because it’s a niche device and it was too close in price to the iPhone 12/13. A Pro Mini is an even more niche device.
One thing already failed. It no longer matters. You need to adapt to what needs to be done to make the iPhone Mini a viable option for consumers. And that is to offer it at a much cheaper price point.
ROTFL. That is sure, it's full of wannabe rich that would appears elite with a 799$ watch. It's a little less full of someone who could spent 1500$ on Ceramic Apple Watch or 17.000$ on gold Apple Watch. Trust me, it's more honest someone with a ceramic or a gold, at least the recognize of premium watch its more subtle than SouthPark Kenny's Watch. XDProbably 10 times as much as the Watch "Editions" (so, around 1000?).
Otoh, it's just €100 more than the stainless steel version and offers more functionality.