That’s a nice price point if true. If the oled screens are updated from last year, the iPhone x(s)+ could be my next phone.
The only way that's going to happen is if people don't buy it. Something that isn't in a huge portion of Apple user's vocabulary.Too bad. It's still expensive. It should be $649 for iPhone X (LCD model), $799 for iPhone X (if OLED) or $749 for iPhone X(if LCD), $899 for iPhone X plus (OLED).
A lot of people just look to buy their flagship device each year. But if that gets priced higher and higher, people will have to choose with spending even more money for their flagship or stick with their devices and not upgrade. $999 is a mental barrier that many simply won't go past.
I think Apple will drop out iPhone X (2017) model, but 6,1" LCD model will have A11 chip. It doesn't make sense to ship 5,8", 6,5" with A12 for almost $1000 and 6,1" also with A12, but $200 less.
The iPhone X is wide but narrow which makes photos and videos look smaller than on Plus devices.
I really don't see the point of a 5.8 AND 6.1 iPhone X even if they have different screens. Pick one Apple. You are just confusing consumers and then they don't make a decision to buy. Keep it simple if you really want to pay homage to Jobs philosophy. (And he was actually just borrowing it, but still good).
Also kill the iPhone 7. No need for a 7 and an 8 in next years line up. Again, just adds confusion.
Remember when we used to make fun of other OEMs for having way too many options? I cant imagine what its like working at an Apple store and trying to explain which iPhone does what LOL 90s Apple called, it wants it product line back
The only way that's going to happen is if people don't buy it. Something that isn't in a huge portion of Apple user's vocabulary.
They are going to slowly creep the price up until they see a drop in profits. So never. I guarantee we will see $2,000 phones in the next 10 to 15 years.
Yeah it's more like a slightly larger 4.7" iPhone in a similar sized body. Everyone makes the mistake of comparing the X to the Plus models when the 6.5" will be more like that, just in a slightly larger body with the bezels stripped away.
Yep, I was definitely duped with the 5.8" sizing. But stuck with it just cause I wanted to try the new all-screen layout. Will probably go to the plus variant of the X if it comes out. sucks that an all screen device has less screen real-estate then the 8+ that has large bezels.
Based on what? Fake news? Did you see Apple sold 83M iPhones on the 14 week basis and did 13% more revenue/profit y/y, over 20% more when you consider 13 week vs 14 week quarters.Apple must have realised that people are not willing to pay a four digit figure for a phone. Better later than never. Their arrogant strategy was punished by customers and the iPhone X basically flopped, which is good. I just feel sorry for all the iPhone X customers that basically paid an outrageous price just to be beta testers of an immature product.
Apple has turned a profit every quarters for the last 20 years, what are you on about?Finally, someone that gets it. Apple has failed to turn a profit in so long, you'd think they would realize these simple facts.
Apple must have realised that people are not willing to pay a four digit figure for a phone. Better later than never. Their arrogant strategy was punished by customers and the iPhone X basically flopped, which is good. I just feel sorry for all the iPhone X customers that basically paid an outrageous price just to be beta testers of an immature product.
I really don't see the point of a 5.8 AND 6.1 iPhone X even if they have different screens. Pick one Apple. You are just confusing consumers and then they don't make a decision to buy. Keep it simple if you really want to pay homage to Jobs philosophy. (And he was actually just borrowing it, but still good).
Also kill the iPhone 7. No need for a 7 and an 8 in next years line up. Again, just adds confusion.
Apple achieved its goal with the $1K iPhone X. Suddenly $899 for the same level device seems reasonable the following year. Prices are still about $100 - $150 higher than they should be. There is no reason the iPhone X could not competitively sell at $799 other than Apple's corporate greed.
I know corporations are theoretically supposed to prioritize shareholders over customers, and Apple is doing a wonderful job at that, but I tend to agree more when Steve Jobs said "As soon as we can lower prices, we do. It’s true that our computers are less expensive today than they were a few years ago, or even last year. But that’s also true of the IBM PC. Our goal is to get computers out to tens of millions of people, and the cheaper we can make them, the easier it’s going to be to do that."
It is a balancing act between what is best for customers and what is best for stockholders. Unfortunately Tim Cook's Apple has swung way too far toward the corporate finance side of things. I would like to think Steve Jobs would have priced the iPhone X in a way that it would have been the runaway best seller for the year in order to get his prized product out to as many fans as possible.