Expect most people don’t pay full retail when they buy phones, usually EIP.A phone that costs more than the average American's mortgage payment....RIGHT.
Pretty sure I won't be buying. So sad what Apple has become.
Expect most people don’t pay full retail when they buy phones, usually EIP.A phone that costs more than the average American's mortgage payment....RIGHT.
Pretty sure I won't be buying. So sad what Apple has become.
What do you mean, "RIGHT?" Apple just sold 83M iPhones in 14 weeks at an ASP of almost $800 (mortgage payment).A phone that costs more than the average American's mortgage payment....RIGHT.
Pretty sure I won't be buying. So sad what Apple has become.
Apple must have realised that people are not willing to pay a four digit figure for a phone. Better later than never. Their arrogant strategy was punished by customers and the iPhone X basically flopped, which is good. I just feel sorry for all the iPhone X customers that basically paid an outrageous price just to be beta testers of an immature product.
Based on what? Musings from a Wall Street sell side analyst? Since Apple doesn’t disclose sales by model and fiscal Q2 results won’t be announced until early May nobody knows how well (or not) the X is selling besides Apple. And on the last earnings call Tim Cook said the X was Apple’s best seller every week since it had gone on sale. I think I’ll trust Tim Cook over a Wall Street analyst. What qualifies as news and rumors these days is complete garbage. Also just because some people think the X is too expensive or not a good product and want it to be a failure doesn’t mean it is.
Why would someone pay $569 USD for a 2 year old phone at the point when the cheap X/X/X+ come out? I am not even considering a 2018 iPhone at all either.
The lineup will be basically 4 models.Remember when we used to make fun of other OEMs for having way too many options? I cant imagine what its like working at an Apple store and trying to explain which iPhone does what LOL 90s Apple called, it wants it product line back
Based on what? Musings from a Wall Street sell side analyst? Since Apple doesn’t disclose sales by model and fiscal Q2 results won’t be announced until early May nobody knows how well (or not) the X is selling besides Apple. And on the last earnings call Tim Cook said the X was Apple’s best seller every week since it had gone on sale. I think I’ll trust Tim Cook over a Wall Street analyst. What qualifies as news and rumors these days is complete garbage. Also just because some people think the X is too expensive or not a good product and want it to be a failure doesn’t mean it is.
That’s still very expensive, especially when you compare it to the Galaxy s9
Remember when we used to make fun of other OEMs for having way too many options? I cant imagine what its like working at an Apple store and trying to explain which iPhone does what LOL 90s Apple called, it wants it product line back
The only way that's going to happen is if people don't buy it. Something that isn't in a huge portion of Apple user's vocabulary.
They are going to slowly creep the price up until they see a drop in profits. So never. I guarantee we will see $2,000 phones in the next 10 to 15 years.
A phone that costs more than the average American's mortgage payment....RIGHT.
Pretty sure I won't be buying. So sad what Apple has become.
A phone that costs more than the average American's mortgage payment....RIGHT.
Pretty sure I won't be buying. So sad what Apple has become.
That's the game many of us play. While Apple does NOT have something, that something is stupid, useless that "99% don't want or need", etc. But then, when Apple rolls that very same something out, it's "shut up and take my money" and "how did we ever get by without <something>", etc.
It was not so long ago the Apple proclaimed 3.5" screens as the "perfect" screen size. When others rolled out bigger screens, Apple ridiculed them and we right with them in lockstep. Then, Apple when to a 4" screen as the new "perfect" and we right with them, ridiculing everything larger than 4": "fragmentation", "poor developers", "pants with bigger pockets" and "one-handed use."
Then Apple adopts bigger screen phones and we roll right with them. I'm still to see pants with bigger pockets and there was apparently a huge leap in hand-size evolution because it's fairly rare to see anyone arguing for one-handed use anymore. Where did all that consumer opinion passion go?
NFC (pay with a phone) was a stupid, gimmick, that "nobody needed" when it was in non-Apple phones. But then Apple rolls out Apple Pay and we want to boycott stores that won't allow us to pay that way.
We thoroughly ridiculed the notch as "no way Apple would do that" when it was an early rumor. Now it's "I like the notch" and "I don't even notice it" is spun at every lingering doubt about it.
Basically, Apple can just do anything. A big chunk of us will readily accept that anything and then work double-time to try to convince everyone else that that anything is "must have." Lingering nay sayers about the anything will just be relentlessly shouted down because clearly "$2XX Billion in the bank can't be wrong."
Maybe the next phone will roll out with dual notches or notches on every side? Rumor that now and we'll probably collectively hate & ridicule the idea. Apple rolls it out? We'll love it: "the aesthetic balance of dual or quad notches is beautiful"... "I absolutely love the bezel-less phone with quad notches. Apple innovates a terrific solution for getting rid of those ugly bezels while still giving places for our thumbs or fingers to hold the front- genius!!!" Etc.
Maybe Apple will eject the camera or battery out to an add-on case to they can roll out a "thinnest ever" phone for at least the same price and then increase revenue-per-unit-sold when pretty much everyone must BUY the case to power the new phone and/or take a picture with it. We'll just gush about Apple's genius as we find ourselves paying about $1000 for a phone and then adding about $300 for a case we have to have to be able to do what used to be baked INSIDE iPhones.
Maybe Apple will make the next ones out of rusted razor blades, causing users to bleed profusely every time they use them. We'll then spin that into how turning over our blood supply more frequently is good for our health.
Welcome to the fandom... where a corporation can make just any old decision and we'll passionately love it exactly as they choose to serve it up... and then work really hard- for free- to try to make everyone else love it too.
Honestly, I don't know why people who actually buy their phone -- not rent -- upgrade every year. The year-to-year changes are not that significant. I did have to do some mental gymnastics to justify spending $1200 on a phone but now that that is done I'm good for a couple years at least. If I sold my X this Oct maybe I'd get $600 for it. I can't think of any major add on feature in the 2018 model worth spending $400+ on.
It's Apple 101, price it as high as people are willing to pay. I don't know why you think it was different when Steve Jobs was around. The original iPods were some of the most expensive MP3 players on the market. The original iPhones (during Steve Jobs time) were priced higher then competitors as well. It's the way of Apple. The sooner people bail on them, the sooner they'll start to move away from that philosophy. Anyone in the senior management position at Apple that doesn't follow that line, won't be in that position for long.
I think it's more so that people choose the Apple/iOS platform and are happy with any changes/features that are added over time. OLED, wireless charging, etc. would never make me switch platforms. I just wait until Apple implements as their execution is always solid and you know you're getting a good product. I don't think it's as complicated as you make it out to be. For many of us, Android offerings aren't even on our radar.
I think you probably mean "tall and narrow" not "wide and narrow". But I see your take (after a second reading).The iPhone X is wide but narrow which makes photos and videos look smaller than on Plus devices.
I respect that, but I was poking more toward how we will relentlessly HATE on such features that Apple doesn't have until Apple adds them. Then we love those features.
In other words, when the other guys have a great feature(s) that Apple does not, most of us will ridicule that feature(s) to no end... but then "shut up and take my money" love it when Apple adopts it. And there's the poke. Were we writing down what we really thought of such features before Apple had them... or just towing the company line?