There’s been Bluetooth trackers from various companies (knockoffs or not) for years. The only difference Tile has from them is brand recognition and subsequent installed user base.
And it’s not just the loss of sales/subscriptions, but that those previous customers will no longer have any need for the Tile app, which means the installed base used for crowdsource detection diminishes.
This partnership is an attempt to replace the lost detection devices, but still keep the Tile network as a ‘special’ feature. If they switched to a competitor, or an open one that ran on all Android devices (for example); why would anyone buy a Tile rather than the cheapest alternative that can also run on the same network?
Which essentially means; Amazon could easily have an ‘Amazon Basics’ tracker on sale probably within hours if they wanted. While if their network can already manage the detection; all that’s missing is the app…Because instead of buying them they can harvest all their IP and make their own tracker for less.
I think it’s more a deflection of blame; they’re fully expecting to lose a good chunk of their customers directly to Airtags.So Tile can still compete. All their earlier whining is for nothing.
And it’s not just the loss of sales/subscriptions, but that those previous customers will no longer have any need for the Tile app, which means the installed base used for crowdsource detection diminishes.
This partnership is an attempt to replace the lost detection devices, but still keep the Tile network as a ‘special’ feature. If they switched to a competitor, or an open one that ran on all Android devices (for example); why would anyone buy a Tile rather than the cheapest alternative that can also run on the same network?