Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Tim Cook: Well we launched a pencil, not a stylus, first of all, and there's a big difference
Well, I don't feel there's that much of a difference per se. I think the bigger difference is the software the pencil/stylus operates with than the device itself. The old stylus was used more for a point and tap way of doing things while the new pencil does not only that but a lot more and its more of a software enhancement I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mhuggett
The comments that Steve Jobs wouldn't approve make me laugh. Go back and watch the iPhone keynote, he is talking about phones back then REQUIRING a stylus (plastic stick) to use basic functions like dialing a number.

Remember when, after years of claiming a clean minimalist interface was the best, Jobs announced 'beautiful desktop wallpapers' and the crowd laughed because they thought he was joking? Remember how at first he was opposed to the iOS App Store (preferring Web 2.0/Ajax)? He wasn't infallible and often went back on words he said just a keynote before.

Steve Jobs LOVED accessories. Want VGA on your PowerBook, he's got a $39 dongle for that. Is your iPod cold? 6 Apple Socks for $29!

There is nothing on my iPad Pro that requires the Pencil. I can draw with my finger if I want. But unless you are three years old, you don't stick your finger in paint and draw on paper. The pencil is an ACCESSORY that allows people to draw like they would on paper on an iPad.

Jobs would spin it the same way as Cook, it's a pencil not a stylus.
 
Have people forgotten that Steve Jobs is dead, what Steve would or wouldn't do is irrelevant. Also Steve was notorious for changing his mind, he wasn't perfect and often backtracked, especially when people confronted him with better options.
 
Love my iPad Pro with pencil but unless the iPhone comes with a mini-pencil tucked away inside the phone, it's probably not going to work. And Ive will never allow the phone to get thicker to facilitate that..
 
Yeah, the context where UI-navigation and nobody disagrees with him on that these days..

I´m quite sure he did not meant it like:
"All great artists only do finger painting, if you se a brush or a pencil, they blew it.."
I was actually saying the same thing........
 
I'm sure this has all been said before, but did any of you ever use a device that came with a stylus 10 years ago? They required a stylus. They would not work without one. The screens didn't work with fingers. Finger input (and especially multitouch) changed the game in this market. Styluses then became a simple marker of primitive and limited hardware.

Yes, I did use one of those devices that "required" a stylus. A Treo 650. It came with a stylus and when I lost mine it was fingertip navigation for a while until I got another. It wasn't pretty as the targets were small but it would register with a fingertip or fingernail press.

It would work without a stylus.

This is from someone who actually used one of these devices, not repeating wrong "facts" they read on the Internet.
 
The pencil goes against everything Steve believed in, anyone who thinks different has no clue
Yesterday, I signed for my daughter's treatment with my finger on a computer.

Now I know how Ugg, the first indigenous spelunking dweller (cave person) signed his/her name.

Digital Pen/cils make sense. For those in this thread that want them smaller and thinner, I've used those on my Windows Phone and no, thank you. The best one I've used is the one on the Newton 2000. It had heft, and felt like I was using something of quality. My :apple: Pencil is waiting in the box, for when I save enough to get the iPad Pro I want, but if the iPhone 7 Pro + uses it first, I'll be good with that.
 
Well, I don't feel there's that much of a difference per se. I think the bigger difference is the software the pencil/stylus operates with than the device itself. The old stylus was used more for a point and tap way of doing things while the new pencil does not only that but a lot more and its more of a software enhancement I think.
It's marketing, plain and simple. Surface Pen? Yup, a stylus. Samsung's S Pen? Ditto. Apple Pencil? Still a stylus.
Jony Ive said as much. He said he didn't want to call it a stylus. He wanted to call it something else because {insert marketing speak here}. It's a stylus... they all are. You are right in that they all have more capability than the older models. That doesn't make them pencils and pens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
The comments that Steve Jobs wouldn't approve make me laugh. Go back and watch the iPhone keynote, he is talking about phones back then REQUIRING a stylus (plastic stick) to use basic functions like dialing a number.

Steve Jobs has been conveniently repackaged in a myriad of out-of-context quotes ready to be bent and adapted to any narratives.
 
Last edited:
Yep but Apple needs to find a way to stow the pencil when not used. Because that thing floating in a bag or a pocket is a loss waiting to happen.
They still haven't with the iPad Pro.

Logitech has, however.
backlit-keyboard-case-with-smart-connector.png
 
The pencil is almost 3/4" longer than the iPhone Plus is high... this means case solutions to carry Phone and Pencil will make your Phone footprint even larger. So... just carry an iPad Mini at that point. It's only an additional inch taller.
 
Ahaha, logged in for the first time in ages to reply to this. This is brilliant - you did this on purpose, yes?

Yeah, I didn't notice it at first! So, to recap:

1) Steve Jobs said no stylus
2) whoever "Thinks Different" has no clue
3) Steve jobs famously thinks different
3) Steve Jobs has no clue
4) stylus is good
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wondercow
The problem I see Steve having would be he may want seamless user experience, not carrying a pencil around . With iPad MAYBE I can but what your saying. But 1000% not with iPhone.
I wouldn't be so sure on the basis that the Apple Pencil is 100% optional. One needs to keep in mind what the devices he was comparing the iPhone at the time consisted of. They were devices where the primary input method was a stylus, regardless of what you were doing. The devices used resistive displays which are a relic and didn't support multi touch.

Would Stve Jobs have been against an accessory that was optional? I'm not so sure. He's the same person who dropped in on calligraphy classes because he found the art of writing inspiring. Clearly he wouldn't want the Apple Pencil to replace touch input on an iPhone, but he may have seen use cases for it. At the time stylus input vastly inferior to what it is today, and if we are honest the OS using it were rubbing too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Return Zero
Apple Pencil is a completely optional full-sized digital artists' drawing tool, and with the iPad Pro it's damn near as good as (or better than) the best digital drawing methods you can find. It fills a niche need and provides functionality that your fingers will never be able to. That is decidedly not what Steve Jobs was talking about when he railed against styli, which were an essential modus operandi for mobile devices early last decade.

I really can't believe people are still upset about this.
 
Definition of Stylus: "an ancient writing implement, consisting of a small rod with a pointed end for scratching letters on wax-covered tablets, and a blunt end for obliterating them."

Therefore, Apple's pencil is not a stylus, till their blunt end actually erases what the pointy end creates. Otherwise, in this narrow definition, the pencil is a stylus. The context of it's creation is "creativity" not a device to interact with a UI for the purpose of functionality access. Having said this, just because it can ALSO do that, doesn't correlate to it's "reason for being".

I don't need a stylus to interact with a mobile device, I do need a stylus to draw and write on that device.

At least that's my view... as irrelevant or irreverent as it may be.
 
This would:

a) Be a blatant copy of Samsung
b) Truly go against Steve Jobs' original view of the iPhone. I'm sure he said something to the effect of the stylus being unnecessary and the finger being the ideal input device.
[doublepost=1473253671][/doublepost]
Yep but Apple needs to find a way to stow the pencil when not used. Because that thing floating in a bag or a pocket is a loss waiting to happen.

Removing the headphone jack would allow for a lovely little pencil-shaped hole. Like the Note 7. Although that managed to keep the headphone jack. And it's waterproof. (and it explodes, but what's some fire between friends?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohio.emt
Definition of Stylus: "an ancient writing implement, consisting of a small rod with a pointed end for scratching letters on wax-covered tablets, and a blunt end for obliterating them."

Therefore, Apple's pencil is not a stylus, till their blunt end actually erases what the pointy end creates.
And if you keep reading the definition: A pen-like device used to input handwritten text or drawings directly into a computer

The Apple Pencil is a stylus, but Cook is trying to differentiate it from what the populous thinks of when they hear "stylus", i.e. the method that used to be the standard for using our portable devices, where one had a little stick, finger, etc. to put pressure on the screen in order to do anything
 
I firmly disagree.

When Steve was talking about the stylus, he was talking about the user interface to control the device. He found that touch was the most intuitive and efficient interface to control a mobile OS, over carrying a stylus and tapping the screen with that. I would agree.

When Tim Cook talks about the Apple Pencil, he's talking about the user interface to draw and add functionality that the finger can't really do. He's not talking about replacing the finger. Most people find that a pencil is the most intuitive and efficient interface to sketch photographs. I would agree.
[doublepost=1473245857][/doublepost]

Respectfully, the Apple Pencil isn't quite marketed for 'normal people'; it's more of a niche product, specifically for graphic design. Unless every Tom, Dick, and Harry work at Pixar!

I'm sorry , it's a stylus, irrespective of the trademark name.

Steves point is that your should design a device that can achieve all your needs without a stylus / pencil . If your need a pencil to perform certain functions you have failed. Simple as that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 69Mustang
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.